Let’s be real for a second. The "possession" subgenre of horror is crowded. Like, really crowded. You’ve seen one spinning head or heard one gravelly voice shouting in Latin, and you’ve basically seen them all, right? Well, sort of. Then you stumble across something like The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist, a 2023 release that feels like it’s trying to claw its way out of the low-budget indie basement by leaning into pure, unadulterated grit.
It’s messy. It’s loud. It’s definitely not The Exorcist (1973), but honestly, it isn't trying to be. Directed by Johnny Cohen, this film is a fascinating case study in what happens when you take the traditional tropes of the Catholic Church and douse them in the aesthetic of a modern-day grindhouse flick. You’ve got Father Peter, a man whose faith is hanging by a thread, and a plot that involves a whole lot more than just a bed-shaking teenager.
What The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist Actually Gets Right
Most people go into these types of movies expecting a snooze-fest of predictable jumpscares. While the film has those—let's not kid ourselves—the actual "vibe" is what sticks. It’s grim. The cinematography doesn't try to look like a polished Marvel movie; it’s dark, shadowed, and feels a bit claustrophobic. That works in its favor. When you’re dealing with a title like The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist, you aren't looking for high-brow philosophical debates on the nature of the soul. You want the visceral stuff. You want the blood.
The story follows a seasoned exorcist who has seen too much. Standard? Yes. But the way the film integrates the physical toll of the ritual is what stands out. It’s not just about prayers. It’s about the "blood" mentioned in that title. There’s a physical cost to the spirituality here that feels heavy.
Independent horror often survives on its ability to do what big studios won't. Big studios want a PG-13 rating so they can get the teenager demographic on a Friday night. Cohen doesn't seem to care about that. He goes for the throat with practical effects that, while clearly working on a budget, have more soul than the CGI sludge we usually see in mainstream horror.
The Problem With Modern Possession Tropes
We have a bit of a problem in the horror community. We’re addicted to the formula.
✨ Don't miss: Who was the voice of Yoda? The real story behind the Jedi Master
- A family moves into a house.
- The kid starts acting weird.
- The skeptical dad ignores it.
- The mom calls a priest.
- Chaos.
The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist tries to skip some of the fluff. It treats the world as if the demonic is already a known, albeit terrifying, quantity. It’s gritty. It feels lived-in. However, the film does struggle with the "indie curse"—the pacing can be a bit frantic at times, jumping from one intense confrontation to another without letting the atmosphere breathe.
But maybe that’s the point.
Life isn't a slow burn. Sometimes it's just one disaster after another.
Breaking Down the Visual Language of Johnny Cohen
If you look at Johnny Cohen’s filmography, you see a pattern of high-concept horror delivered through a low-fi lens. In The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist, the camera work is restless. It moves. It shakes. It makes you feel like an uninvited guest in the room. This isn't just about a lack of tripods; it’s a stylistic choice meant to mirror the instability of the characters' minds.
There’s a specific scene—no spoilers—where the lighting shifts from a sickly yellow to a deep, bruising red. It’s unsubtle. It’s loud. But in the context of an exorcism movie, it’s exactly what the doctor ordered. We’ve moved past the era where a simple cross on the wall is enough to scare an audience. We need the sensory overload.
🔗 Read more: Not the Nine O'Clock News: Why the Satirical Giant Still Matters
Why the "Exorcist" Brand Still Dominates
It’s kind of wild that fifty years after William Peter Blatty’s story hit the screen, we’re still obsessed with the rite of exorcism. Why? Probably because it’s the ultimate "good vs. evil" showdown. There’s no ambiguity. In The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist, that line is drawn in the sand (or blood, technically).
- The Priest: Usually a broken man looking for redemption.
- The Demon: A loudmouthed entity that knows everyone's secrets.
- The Victim: A vessel for trauma.
This movie leans into these archetypes but adds a layer of "street-level" grit. This isn't the Vatican. This is the trenches. And that’s where the film finds its identity. It’s not about the gold-plated halls of the papacy; it’s about a man, a cross, and a very bad night.
How to Watch It Without Expecting a Blockbuster
If you go into The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist expecting the production value of The Conjuring, you’re going to have a bad time. Honestly. You have to appreciate it for what it is: a piece of "B-movie" art that wears its influences on its sleeve. It’s for the people who spend their Saturday nights scrolling through the "Newly Added" section of Tubi or Shudder.
It’s for the fans of Italian horror from the 70s—the Lucio Fulci crowd. The ones who don't mind if the dubbing is a little off or if the blood looks a bit like corn syrup, as long as the feeling is right.
The acting is surprisingly earnest. You can tell the cast is giving it their all. Sometimes in low-budget horror, the actors phone it in because they think the genre is beneath them. Not here. There is a palpable sense of desperation in the performances that carries the thinner parts of the script.
💡 You might also like: New Movies in Theatre: What Most People Get Wrong About This Month's Picks
Fact-Checking the Rite
While the movie takes huge liberties for the sake of entertainment, the concept of the "Blood of the Exorcist" touches on an interesting theological idea—the notion that the exorcist takes on the suffering of the possessed. Real-world exorcists, like the late Father Gabriele Amorth (who claimed to have performed tens of thousands of exorcisms), often spoke about the physical and mental exhaustion that follows a "bout."
The movie turns this exhaustion into a literal bloodbath. It’s an exaggeration, sure, but it’s rooted in that very real idea of spiritual transference.
The Practical Takeaway for Horror Fans
If you're looking for something new to add to your spooky-season rotation, or if you just want to see how independent filmmakers are handling the possession genre in the 2020s, The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist is worth a look. It serves as a reminder that horror doesn't always need a $50 million budget to be effective. Sometimes it just needs a clear vision and a willingness to get messy.
To get the most out of this film, watch it in the dark. Ignore your phone. Let the low-budget grime wash over you. It’s a specific flavor of cinema—salty, bitter, and a little bit metallic.
Next Steps for the Genre Obsessed:
- Seek out "The Crucifix: Blood of the Exorcist" on streaming platforms like Amazon Prime or specialized horror sites to see the practical effects in action.
- Compare it to Cohen's other work to see how his style has evolved regarding lighting and pacing.
- Research the "New Wave of British/Indie Horror" to see how small-scale productions are currently outshining major studio releases in terms of raw creativity.
- Look into the history of the "Mockbuster" and how titles like this often cleverly use keywords to find an audience that the big studios ignore.
The film is a testament to the fact that as long as there are people with cameras and a fascination with the dark, the exorcism movie will never truly die. It just keeps evolving, getting bloodier and more desperate with every iteration.