Most love stories end at the altar. You know the drill: the music swells, the "difficult" parent finally gives their blessing, and the credits roll while the couple stares into each other's eyes. It’s a beautiful lie. We’ve been fed a diet of Romanticism that suggests finding "The One" is the finish line.
Honestly, that’s where the real trouble starts.
In The Course of Love, Alain de Botton basically argues that our obsession with the "happily ever after" has made us incredibly bad at actually being married. He doesn’t care about the cinematic first kiss. He cares about why you’re screaming at each other in the middle of an IKEA because you can't agree on which drinking glasses to buy.
It’s not a romance novel. It’s a survival guide disguised as fiction.
Why The Course of Love is the Reality Check We All Need
De Botton returns to the novel format two decades after his debut, Essays in Love, to follow a couple named Rabih and Kirsten. They meet in Edinburgh. They fall in love. They marry. And then, they spend the next thirteen years trying not to ruin everything.
The book is structured weirdly, but in a good way. You get the narrative of their lives—the kids, the career stresses, the occasional temptation to stray—interspersed with italicized philosophical "interruptions." It’s like having a very wise, slightly cynical therapist whispering in your ear while you watch a marriage unfold.
💡 You might also like: Cooper City FL Zip Codes: What Moving Here Is Actually Like
The Romanticism Trap
We live in a culture that treats love as an instinct. We think if it’s "right," it should be easy. De Botton calls foul on this. He suggests that the Romantic movement—the one that tells us our partner should be our soulmate, best friend, co-parent, and sexual firebrand all at once—is actually a recipe for misery.
When Rabih and Kirsten argue over who should do the dishes or how to handle a toddler’s tantrum, they aren't failing at love. They are experiencing The Course of Love. The book argues that we should replace Romanticism with "Classical" love—a version that accepts that we are all, to some degree, "crazy" and that the person we marry will inevitably be quite frustrating.
The IKEA Argument and Other "Small" Disasters
There’s a famous scene in the book where the couple fights over those IKEA glasses. It sounds trivial. To an outsider, it is trivial. But de Botton zooms in on the subtext. It’s not about the glasses; it’s about the fear that our partner doesn't respect our taste, or worse, doesn't see us for who we really are.
Rabih is Lebanese-born, an urban planner who is "anxious to the core." Kirsten is a Scottish surveyor who is fiercely independent and avoidant. Their attachment styles clash constantly.
- Rabih's Anxious Style: He needs constant reassurance. When Kirsten is cold, he panics.
- Kirsten's Avoidant Style: When things get heavy, she retreats. She values self-sufficiency above all.
This isn't a "toxic" relationship. It’s just a normal one. The genius of the book is how it validates the "petty" stuff. It tells you that being annoyed by how your partner eats cereal doesn't mean you're with the wrong person. It just means you're alive and in close quarters with another flawed human.
📖 Related: Why People That Died on Their Birthday Are More Common Than You Think
The Scandalous Truth About Infidelity
Eventually, the book touches on something most "sweet" romances avoid: Rabih has an affair.
It’s not a grand, soul-searching romance. It’s a brief, somewhat pathetic encounter at a conference. What’s interesting—and what makes some readers really angry—is how de Botton handles the aftermath. Rabih doesn't confess.
The author argues that sometimes, silence is a form of love. If the affair was a mistake that won't happen again, confessing might just be a way to offload your own guilt at the expense of your partner’s peace of mind. It’s a controversial take. Many people think honesty is the only way. But de Botton suggests that the "Course of Love" requires a level of pragmatism that makes us uncomfortable. He views marriage as a long-term institution that can, and sometimes must, survive moments of profound failure.
Lessons from the "School of Life"
So, what are we supposed to do with all this?
The book leans heavily on the idea that love is a skill, not just a feeling. You aren't born knowing how to handle a "sulk." Speaking of sulking, de Botton’s analysis of it is legendary. He defines a sulk as a complex mixture of intense anger and a desperate desire not to communicate. We sulk because we want our partner to read our minds—because if they truly loved us, they wouldn't need us to explain why we're hurt.
👉 See also: Marie Kondo The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up: What Most People Get Wrong
It's a childish impulse, but de Botton asks us to be kind to that "inner child" in our partners.
Actionable Insights for Your Own Relationship
If you want to apply the wisdom of The Course of Love to your life, start here:
- Stop looking for "The One." Accept that anyone you marry will be wrong for you in significant ways. The goal is to find the person whose "brand of crazy" you can negotiate with most effectively.
- Learn the Art of the "Teaching" Moment. We often try to "fix" our partners through criticism. De Botton suggests we should view ourselves as both teachers and students. But you can't teach someone when you're screaming at them. You can only teach when there is "incredible sweetness and patience."
- Normalize Therapy. Rabih and Kirsten eventually go to a marriage counselor. The book treats this not as a sign of a dying marriage, but as a necessary maintenance tool, like taking a car in for a tune-up.
- Practice Romantic Realism. Lower your expectations for daily life. If you expect your partner to be your everything, you'll always be disappointed. If you expect them to be a flawed, occasionally annoying, but fundamentally decent companion, you might actually be happy.
The Course of Love isn't an easy read if you're looking for an escape. It’s a mirror. It forces you to look at your own tendencies toward pettiness, silence, and projection. But it’s also incredibly hopeful. It suggests that while love is hard, it’s also a "quietly audacious" journey that is worth the effort, provided you're willing to trade your fairy tales for something much more real.
To dive deeper, you might want to look into attachment theory, specifically how "anxious" and "avoidant" styles interact in long-term partnerships. Understanding your own blueprint is usually the first step toward not blowing up your next trip to IKEA.