The Clinton Blue Dress Painting: What Really Happened

You’ve probably seen the photo. It’s grainy, looks like it was taken on a flip phone from 2012, and shows a painting that makes you double-take so hard you might get whiplash. It is a portrait of Bill Clinton. He's lounging in a chair in the Oval Office, wearing a pair of bright red heels and a flowing, silky blue dress.

The image feels like a fever dream.

For years, the clinton blue dress painting—officially titled Parsing Bill—existed as a fringe internet mystery. It blew up in 2019 when news broke that the original oil painting was hanging in Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. People lost their minds. Was it a secret signal? Was it Epstein "trolling" the former president? Honestly, the truth is way more mundane than the conspiracy theories suggest, but the story of how it got there is still pretty wild.

Who Actually Painted "Parsing Bill"?

The artist isn't some deep-state operative or a political strategist. Her name is Petrina Ryan-Kleid.

At the time she created it, she was just a grad student at the New York Academy of Art. She wasn't even American; she’s Australian. Back in 2012, she was working on her Master’s thesis and decided to paint satirical portraits of the two most recent presidents: Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

👉 See also: Charlie Kirk's Kids: How Old They Are and What Really Happened

The Clinton one, of course, features the dress. The Bush one, titled War Games, shows the younger Bush sitting on the floor of the Oval Office playing with paper airplanes and building blocks. It’s a "silly school artwork," as she later described it. She was basically just riffing on how the media and opposing parties caricature these guys.

The painting sold at a fundraiser called the Tribeca Ball in 2012. Ryan-Kleid says she had no idea who bought it. She walked away with about $1,300, and the painting vanished into a private collection. She didn't think about it again for seven years until her phone started exploding with notifications after Epstein's death.

Why the Blue Dress and Red Heels?

The symbolism isn't exactly subtle.

• The Blue Dress: This is a direct shot at the Monica Lewinsky scandal. That Gap dress basically became a character of its own in the 90s.
• The Red Heels: Some art critics think they reference the American flag colors (red, white, and blue), while others see it as a nod to "The Red Shoes" fairytale about sin and redemption.
• The Pose: Clinton is lounging, pointing at the viewer in a way that mimics the famous "Uncle Sam" poster.

Interesting side note: some people pointed out that the dress in the painting looks suspiciously like one Hillary Clinton wore to the 2009 Kennedy Center Honors. Whether that was intentional or just a coincidence of Ryan-Kleid’s reference material is still debated.

✨ Don't miss: Celebrities Born on September 24: Why This Specific Birthday Breeds Creative Giants

The Epstein Connection

The real reason this painting is famous isn't the art itself. It’s the location.

In August 2019, law enforcement sources confirmed to the New York Post that the painting was prominently displayed in Epstein’s $56 million Upper East Side home. It wasn't tucked away in a basement. It was in a room to the right of the entrance.

Imagine walking into a billionaire’s mansion and the first thing you see is the 42nd President in drag. It’s bizarre. It fits the pattern of Epstein’s other "decor," which included a human chessboard and a wall of prosthetic eyeballs.

For the conspiracy crowd, the clinton blue dress painting was "proof" of something dark. But for Petrina Ryan-Kleid, it was a nightmare. She told Artnet News that she was "absolutely stunned" to find out where it ended up. She’s since lived a quiet life, largely distancing herself from the political firestorm her thesis project accidentally sparked.

🔗 Read more: Brooks Nader Naked: What Really Happened with That Sheer Dress Controversy

What Most People Get Wrong

People love to think Bill Clinton sat for this. He didn't.

Ryan-Kleid used a model named Christophe Nayel. He’s the one who actually posed in the dress (or at least provided the body for the composition). Nayel was just as shocked as everyone else when the painting went viral. He actually recognized his own legs in the news photos.

Also, it’s worth noting that this isn't the only "blue dress" painting of Clinton. There's an official portrait by Nelson Shanks that hangs in the National Portrait Gallery. Shanks admitted in 2015 that he secretly painted a shadow in the background that represents the blue dress.

Clearly, that specific garment is haunted.

Actionable Insights

If you’re looking into the history of this piece for research or art collecting, keep these facts in mind:

1. Check the Artist’s Statement: Ryan-Kleid has been very vocal about her lack of partisan intent. Reading her actual interviews on Artnet provides the best context.
2. Beware of Reprints: You can actually buy prints of Parsing Bill on sites like Saatchi Art. If you see one in the wild, it’s likely a reproduction, not the original that was in the mansion.
3. Context Matters: View the painting alongside its companion piece, War Games. When you see them together, the satirical "school project" vibe becomes much clearer than when the Clinton piece is viewed in isolation.

The original painting's current whereabouts are technically tied up in the legal mess of the Epstein estate, but its digital ghost will probably live on Reddit and Twitter forever.