John Updike was usually the guy writing about suburban affairs and the quiet desperation of middle-class Pennsylvania. Then he wrote The Centaur. It’s a weird book. It’s dense, it’s mythic, and honestly, it’s probably the most heartbreaking thing he ever put on paper. If you only know Updike from the Rabbit series or his short stories in The New Yorker, you’re missing the moment where he actually took a massive technical risk and stuck the landing.
Published in 1963, The Centaur isn't just a coming-of-age story. It’s a dual-layered narrative where a high school teacher is also Chiron, the noble centaur from Greek mythology. His son, Peter, is Prometheus. It sounds like a gimmick. It sounds like the kind of thing a creative writing student tries when they’ve read too much Joyce. But for Updike, this was deeply personal. He was writing about his own father, Wesley Updike, and the grueling, self-sacrificing life of a public school teacher in the 1940s.
Why The Centaur Won the National Book Award
Critics in the early sixties didn't quite know what to do with it at first. Some found the mythological "gloss"—the way characters flickered between being humans in Olinger, Pennsylvania, and gods on Olympus—distracting. But the National Book Award committee saw through the artifice. They recognized that the mythology wasn't a mask; it was an amplifier.
When George Caldwell (the father) is being yelled at by his principal, he’s also Chiron dealing with Cronus. This isn't just Updike being fancy. He’s trying to say that the mundane struggles of a "nobody" are actually titanic. A man trying to fix his car in a snowstorm is as heroic as a god battling titans. That’s the core of the book. It’s about the nobility of suffering for your children.
Updike’s prose here is at its absolute peak. He hasn't yet settled into some of the late-career habits that turned some readers off. The sentences are electric. One moment you’re reading a gritty description of a locker room, and the next, the prose expands into a cosmic meditation on time and death. It’s jarring. It’s supposed to be.
The Father-Son Dynamic That Actually Feels Real
Let’s talk about Peter. He’s fifteen. He has psoriasis (just like Updike did). He’s embarrassed by his father but also terrified of losing him. Most literature about fathers and sons focuses on conflict—the rebellion. The Centaur is different. It’s about the weight of empathy.
✨ Don't miss: Temuera Morrison as Boba Fett: Why Fans Are Still Divided Over the Daimyo of Tatooine
Peter watches his father, George, get humiliated by students. He watches him fret over money. He watches him literally give his life away in small increments of time and energy. It’s painful to read because it’s so recognizable. We’ve all had that moment where we realize our parents are just people, and usually, they're people who are tired and struggling.
Updike captures that specific 1940s Pennsylvania atmosphere so well you can almost smell the coal dust and the stale gym air. He doesn't romanticize it. The town of Olinger is small and claustrophobic. But through the mythic lens, he turns that claustrophobia into something grand.
The Trick of the Double Narrative
How does the mythology actually work in The Centaur? It’s not a 1:1 translation. It’s more like a double exposure in photography.
Take the character of Vera Hummel. In the "real" world, she’s the gym teacher. In the mythic world, she’s Venus. When she’s in the shower at the school, Updike describes her in a way that feels both erotic and divine. It’s not just a horny author trope (though Updike certainly had those tendencies). It’s about the hidden divinity in everyday people.
- The mythology provides the "why" behind the characters' pain.
- The realism provides the "how" of their daily survival.
- The overlap creates a sense of "cosmic tragedy" in a mundane setting.
Some readers find the "Chiron" chapters—the ones set purely in the mythic realm—to be the hardest to get through. They’re dense with Greek names and archaic concepts. But if you skip them, you lose the stakes. Chiron is the "wounded healer." He can’t heal himself, but he can teach others. That is George Caldwell's entire identity. He is a teacher who is effectively dying so his son can live a better life.
🔗 Read more: Why Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy Actors Still Define the Modern Spy Thriller
The Legend of the Wounded Healer
The myth of Chiron is that he was accidentally struck by a poisoned arrow. Being immortal, he couldn't die, but the pain was eternal. He eventually gave up his immortality so that Prometheus (humanity) could have fire and be free.
In the novel, George Caldwell thinks he has cancer. He spends the whole book undergoing tests, waiting for the results, and dreading the "arrow" in his side. Whether or not he actually has the disease almost doesn't matter. The fear is the poison. The job is the poison. His willingness to keep going despite the pain is his sacrifice. It’s a brutal look at the American middle class.
Is Updike Still Relevant?
There’s been a lot of talk lately about whether Updike’s "Great White Male" perspective has aged well. In many cases, it hasn't. His treatment of female characters can be frustratingly narrow. But The Centaur usually escapes the harshest critiques because it’s so focused on the universal experience of the parent-child bond.
It’s less about the "male ego" and more about the "male burden."
Honestly, if you read The Centaur alongside modern "autofiction" like Knausgaard or Lerner, you can see the DNA. Updike was doing high-level autobiographical fiction long before it was a trendy genre. He was mining his own life for every scrap of detail, but he had the courage to wrap it in a bizarre, experimental structure.
💡 You might also like: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
Why You Should Read It Now
We live in an era of "quiet quitting" and discussions about burnout. George Caldwell is the patron saint of burnout. He’s a man who hates his job but does it because he loves his son.
- The prose is a masterclass. Even if you hate the plot, the way Updike describes a car engine or a winter sky is unmatched.
- The structure is a puzzle. Trying to figure out which Greek god corresponds to which townsperson is actually pretty fun.
- The emotional payoff is massive. The ending of this book is one of the most powerful "final notes" in 20th-century literature.
Practical Takeaways for the Modern Reader
If you're going to dive into The Centaur, don't try to "solve" the mythology on the first read. You don't need a degree in Classics to feel the weight of the story.
First, focus on the relationship between George and Peter. Notice the way they talk to each other in the car. It’s awkward, it’s strained, and it’s deeply loving. That is the heart of the book. The Greek stuff is just the environment.
Second, pay attention to the setting. Updike’s Pennsylvania is a character in itself. The cold, the mud, and the decaying infrastructure of the post-war era provide the perfect backdrop for a story about a man who feels like he’s running out of time.
How to approach the "difficult" parts:
- Read the Chiron chapters slowly. Don't rush to get back to the "real" story.
- Look for the small details. Updike is a "micro" writer. A single sentence about a pencil sharpener can tell you more than five pages of dialogue.
- Accept the ambiguity. Sometimes the lines between the two worlds blur so much you won't know where you are. That's the point. It's supposed to feel like a fever dream.
Ultimately, The Centaur is a book about the fact that we are all, in some way, carrying a poison arrow. We are all struggling with things that feel mythic in scale, even if the world sees us as just another person standing in line at the grocery store. John Updike took his father's life and turned it into a constellation. That’s a pretty incredible feat for a "suburban" novelist.
Next Steps for the Interested Reader:
Pick up the 1963 edition if you can find it—the cover art usually captures the vibe perfectly. If you find the mythology too heavy, try his short story "The Alligators," which covers similar childhood ground but in a more straightforward way. Then, come back to the novel. It’s worth the struggle.