Walk through a museum today and the weapons First World War soldiers used look like relics. They’re rusty. They’re heavy. They look almost primitive compared to the drone-heavy warfare we see on the news in 2026. But if you were standing in a wet trench in 1916, these things weren't relics. They were terrifying, high-tech monsters that changed how humans kill each other forever. Honestly, the shift was overnight. One day you’re riding a horse with a sword, and the next, you’re being hunted by a machine that can fire 600 rounds a minute. It was a mess.
It wasn’t just about the guns, though. It was about the chemistry. The industrialization of death. People often forget that before 1914, "war" was still largely viewed through a Victorian lens of glory and bright uniforms. The weapons First World War introduced stripped all that away. It turned the battlefield into a factory.
The Machine Gun: The Great Stalemate Maker
Everyone talks about the Maxim gun. Hiram Maxim, an American-born British inventor, basically changed the world because he didn't want to deal with the recoil of a rifle. He figured out how to use that kickback energy to load the next bullet. It’s genius, really. And deadly.
During the Battle of the Somme, the British lost nearly 20,000 men on the first day alone. A huge chunk of those casualties came from German MG 08s. These weren't the lightweight guns you see in video games. They were heavy. They needed water-cooling jackets so the barrels wouldn't melt. If the water ran out? Legend has it soldiers would sometimes urinate in the jackets just to keep the gun firing. It sounds gross, but when the alternative is a bayonet charge, you do what you have to do.
The psychological impact was just as bad as the physical. Imagine the sound. Tack-tack-tack-tack. It never stopped. It forced everyone underground. That’s why we got trenches. You couldn't stand up. If you stood up, you died. Simple as that. It created a weird kind of "dead zone" where nothing could move, which is why the war lasted four years instead of four months.
Chemical Warfare and the Fear of the Invisible
If the machine gun was the physical wall, gas was the invisible nightmare. Chlorine gas first showed up in a big way at the Second Battle of Ypres in April 1915. The Germans waited for the wind to blow toward the French and Algerian lines. They opened the valves on 5,700 cylinders.
A "yellow-green cloud" drifted across.
👉 See also: What Is Hack Meaning? Why the Internet Keeps Changing the Definition
The soldiers thought it was a smoke screen. They stayed in their trenches. Big mistake. Chlorine gas reacts with water in your lungs to create hydrochloric acid. You basically drown on dry land. It’s a horrific way to go. Later, they moved on to Phosgene—which was harder to detect—and the infamous Mustard Gas.
Mustard gas didn't even need you to breathe it in. It was a blistering agent. If it touched your skin, you got massive, agonizing blisters. It stayed in the soil for weeks. You’d sit down in a shell hole to rest, and three hours later, your skin would start peeling off. It didn’t kill as many people as the artillery did, but it broke people's spirits. The British chemist J.B.S. Haldane actually argued that gas was more "humane" because it had a lower fatality rate than high explosives, but tell that to a guy who spent the rest of his life coughing up his own lung tissue.
The Artillery Kings
Artillery was the real killer. Roughly 60% of all casualties in the weapons First World War era came from big guns. We’re talking about massive howitzers like the "Big Bertha" or the French 75mm.
The French 75 was a masterpiece of engineering. It had a hydro-pneumatic recoil system. Before this, when a cannon fired, the whole carriage jumped backward. The crew had to manhandle it back into position and re-aim. With the French 75, the barrel moved, but the carriage stayed still. You could fire 15 rounds a minute. It was like a giant, long-range machine gun.
- Shrapnel Shells: These were designed to explode in the air and shower lead balls downward.
- High Explosives: These were meant to shatter concrete bunkers and turn the ground into a moonscape.
- Creeping Barrages: A tactic where the artillery fired just ahead of their own advancing infantry.
If the timing was off by even ten seconds, you ended up blowing up your own friends. It happened more than anyone likes to admit. The "Drumfire" (the sound of so many guns firing at once that it sounded like a continuous drum roll) drove men insane. We call it PTSD now. Back then, they called it "Shell Shock." Their brains were literally being rattled inside their skulls by the pressure waves.
Tanks: The Clunky Saviors?
The British "Landships" were a desperate attempt to break the trench deadlock. The first tanks, the Mark I, were shaped like rhomboids to climb over trenches. They were hot. They were loud. The fumes inside were so toxic the crews would often pass out or vomit.
✨ Don't miss: Why a 9 digit zip lookup actually saves you money (and headaches)
They weren't "invincible." A direct hit from a field gun would pop them like a tin can. But on September 15, 1916, at Flers-Courcelette, they terrified the Germans. Imagine seeing a moving metal house crawling toward you through the mud, spitting fire. You'd run too.
By 1918, the French had developed the Renault FT. This is basically the grandfather of every modern tank. It had a rotating turret on top. It was small, relatively fast, and manned by only two people. It showed that the future of the weapons First World War had produced wasn't just about size, but about mobility.
Rifles, Bayonets, and the "Trench Sweepers"
Don't ignore the standard-issue gear. Most guys carried a bolt-action rifle. The British had the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield (SMLE). It held ten rounds—double what the German Mauser held. A well-trained British regular could fire 15 aimed shots a minute. They called it the "Mad Minute."
But a long rifle is useless in a cramped trench.
When things got close, it got medieval. Soldiers made "trench clubs"—wooden bats with nails or heavy metal gear parts attached to the end. They used brass knuckles. They used sharpened shovels. A shovel was actually better than a bayonet in a tight space because you could swing it like an axe. It’s a grim thought, but the weapons First World War soldiers relied on were often just as much about 13th-century brutality as 20th-century tech.
And then there was the "Trench Broom"—the Winchester Model 1897 shotgun. The Americans brought these in 1917. The Germans actually protested, saying shotguns were "unnecessarily cruel." This is coming from the guys who used flamethrowers and poison gas. Irony wasn't dead in the 1910s, apparently.
🔗 Read more: Why the time on Fitbit is wrong and how to actually fix it
The Rise of the Warbird
Airplanes started the war as scouting tools. Pilots would wave at each other as they flew over enemy lines. Then they started throwing bricks at each other. Then they started carrying pistols.
Eventually, Anthony Fokker (a Dutchman working for the Germans) perfected the interrupter gear. This let a machine gun fire through the spinning propeller blades without hitting them. Suddenly, the sky was a graveyard. The Red Baron, Manfred von Richthofen, became a superstar because he knew how to use this tech better than anyone else. He had 80 confirmed kills before he was finally brought down.
Why This Still Matters in 2026
The weapons First World War introduced didn't go away; they just evolved. The drone strikes we see today are the direct descendants of the reconnaissance planes of 1914. The ballistic missiles are just bigger versions of the Paris Gun.
If you want to understand modern conflict, you have to look at the mess of 1914–1918. It was the moment humanity realized we could build machines faster than we could build people. It was a hard lesson.
Take Action: Exploring the Legacy
If you're looking to dive deeper into how these weapons functioned or want to see them in person, here are a few specific steps you can take:
- Visit the Imperial War Museum (London) or the National WWI Museum (Kansas City): These are the gold standards. Seeing a Mark V tank in person gives you a scale of the "metal monster" fear that photos just can't convey.
- Read "Storm of Steel" by Ernst Jünger: Unlike many war memoirs, Jünger focuses intensely on the "material" aspect of the war—the way the weapons felt, sounded, and changed the landscape. It’s a raw, non-romanticized look at the tech.
- Research the "Zone Rouge" in France: There are still parts of France today where the soil is so contaminated by lead, arsenic, and unexploded shells from 1916 that humans aren't allowed to live there. It’s a haunting reminder that these weapons have a "half-life" much longer than the war itself.
- Check out "C&Rsenal" on YouTube: If you’re a gearhead, this channel does incredibly deep dives into the mechanics of WWI firearms, including slow-motion footage of how they actually cycle rounds. It’s the best way to see the engineering without the "history textbook" fluff.
The tech was fascinating. The results were tragic. But understanding the weapons First World War created is the only way to really understand the world we live in now.