Most people remember where they were when they first read The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas. It was a gut-punch. So, when John Boyne released The Boy at the Top of the Mountain in 2015, the expectations were sky-high, but the vibe was totally different. It wasn't just another Holocaust story. It was a look at how a regular kid becomes a monster.
Pierrot Fischer starts out as a sweet, flute-playing boy in Paris. By the end, he's a dedicated Nazi. That transformation is honestly terrifying because it happens so slowly you almost miss the moment he crosses the line. We like to think we’d all be heroes in 1930s Europe. Boyne suggests otherwise.
What Actually Happens at the Berghof
The story kicks off with Pierrot losing his parents. He's orphaned and eventually sent to live with his Aunt Beatrix. The catch? She’s the housekeeper for Adolf Hitler at the Berghof, his mountain retreat in the Obersalzberg.
This isn't a history textbook. It's a character study of corruption. Pierrot is renamed Pieter. He's given a uniform. He’s given attention by the most powerful man in the world. Imagine being a lonely, bullied kid and suddenly the "Führer" takes an interest in you. It’s predatory grooming on a geopolitical scale.
Hitler is portrayed not as a cartoon villain, but as a manipulative father figure. He feeds Pieter's ego. He teaches him that power is the only currency that matters. The transition from a French boy who loves his Jewish friend Anshel to a German youth who betrays his own family is devastating.
The Turning Point Most Readers Miss
There is a specific moment where the "Boy at the Top of the Mountain" stops being a victim. It’s not when he puts on the uniform. It’s when he chooses to report a conversation he overheard.
📖 Related: The A Wrinkle in Time Cast: Why This Massive Star Power Didn't Save the Movie
His Aunt Beatrix and the chauffeur, Ernst, are involved in a plot to poison Hitler. Pieter finds out. Instead of staying loyal to the woman who saved him from an orphanage, he chooses the "Great Man." He tells. They are executed.
That’s the pivot.
Boyne doesn't give Pieter an easy out. There’s no "I was just following orders" defense that holds water here because he actively destroyed the people who loved him for a scrap of validation from a tyrant.
Why the Critics Were Split
The book didn't get a universal pass. Some historians and critics argue that by focusing on the "corrupted youth," Boyne risks making the Nazis look like victims of their own ideology. It’s a valid concern. If you make the protagonist a child, the reader naturally wants to empathize.
However, the ending of The Boy at the Top of the Mountain is anything but empathetic.
👉 See also: Cuba Gooding Jr OJ: Why the Performance Everyone Hated Was Actually Genius
Unlike Bruno in Striped Pyjamas, who dies in innocence, Pieter lives in guilt. The final chapters skip ahead to the end of the war and Pieter's long, slow realization of what he helped facilitate. It’s a story about complicity.
- The setting: The Obersalzberg was a real place, and Hitler really did spend a huge amount of time there.
- The tone: It feels like a fable. Boyne uses a very specific, almost detached prose style that makes the horror feel more clinical.
- The connection: Yes, there is a cameo. No spoilers, but if you've read Boyne's other work, keep your eyes peeled for a familiar name toward the end.
The Problem with Historical Fiction for Kids
Writing about the Holocaust for a Young Adult (YA) audience is a minefield. You have to balance the truth with what a younger mind can process. Some say Boyne simplifies things too much.
But honestly?
If you look at the rise of extremism today, the book feels more relevant than ever. It shows how easy it is to radicalize someone by making them feel "special" or "part of an elite." Pieter isn't evil at the start. He’s just small. And he wants to be big. The mountain gives him height, but it robs him of his soul.
The psychological depth here is what sets it apart from typical school library fare. It asks: Can you ever be forgiven for something you did when you didn't know better? Or did you actually know better all along?
✨ Don't miss: Greatest Rock and Roll Singers of All Time: Why the Legends Still Own the Mic
Comparing the Two "Boy" Books
People always ask which one is better.
The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas is about the tragedy of the victim.
The Boy at the Top of the Mountain is about the tragedy of the perpetrator.
The latter is much harder to read in many ways. It's uncomfortable to sit inside the head of a boy who is becoming a bigot. You want to reach into the pages and shake him. You want him to see what we, the readers, see. But he’s blinded by the view from the top.
Actionable Takeaways for Readers and Educators
If you’re picking this up for the first time or teaching it, don't just focus on the plot.
- Track the name change: Look at how the shift from Pierrot to Pieter mirrors his loss of empathy. It's a linguistic "othering" of his former self.
- Research the real Berghof: Use the book as a jumping-off point to look at the historical Obersalzberg. Seeing the real photos of Hitler with children makes the book feel significantly more grounded in a dark reality.
- Discuss the ending: The confrontation with Anshel at the end of the book is the most important scene. It’s the moment the fable hits the brick wall of reality.
The real power of The Boy at the Top of the Mountain isn't in the history—it's in the warning. It reminds us that the loudest voices and the highest peaks often hide the deepest valleys of moral failure.
To get the most out of this story, read it alongside memoirs from the Hitler Youth, such as A Child of Hitler by Alfons Heck. This provides the factual scaffolding that helps the fictional Pieter feel even more like a warning sign from the past. Analyze the moments of "choice" in the narrative; every time Pieter has a chance to be kind, he chooses to be powerful. Mapping those choices is the best way to understand the book's core message about personal responsibility.