The Battle of El Alamein: Why It Was Actually the Turning Point of WWII

The Battle of El Alamein: Why It Was Actually the Turning Point of WWII

Sand. It gets everywhere. It ruins engines, jams rifles, and blinds soldiers. In 1942, a small railway halt in the Egyptian desert became the most important patch of sand on the planet. Most people think of Stalingrad when they imagine the moment Hitler started losing, but Winston Churchill had a different take. He famously remarked that before Alamein, they never had a victory, and after it, they never had a defeat. That’s a bit of an exaggeration—typical Churchill—but the Battle of El Alamein fundamentally broke the back of the Axis powers in North Africa.

It wasn't just one fight.

Historians usually split it into two. The first happened in July 1942, and it was basically a desperate scramble to stop "The Desert Fox," Erwin Rommel, from seizing the Suez Canal. If Rommel had taken the canal, the British Empire would have been effectively sliced in half. The Second Battle of El Alamein, which kicked off in October 1942, was a different beast entirely. It was a massive, grinding operation of attrition. General Bernard Montgomery—"Monty" to his troops—didn't want a "fair" fight. He wanted to crush the Panzer Army Africa with overwhelming math.

The Myth of the "Clean" Desert War

There’s this weird romanticism about the desert war. People call it a "war without hate." They imagine tanks dueling like knights on a chessboard. Honestly? It was brutal. The heat during the day would cook you inside a Crusader tank, and the cold at night would settle into your bones. There was almost no water. Soldiers on both sides were frequently sick with dysentery.

The Battle of El Alamein happened because of a geographic fluke. Usually, desert warfare is all about outflanking the enemy. You just drive around them. But at El Alamein, the Mediterranean Sea was to the north, and the Qattara Depression—a massive, impassable sea of salt marshes and soft sand—was to the south. You couldn't go around. You had to go through.

Rommel knew this. He built what he called the "Devil's Gardens." We're talking about half a million landmines. They weren't just scattered; they were layered with anti-personnel mines, anti-tank mines, and tripwires connected to high explosives. Moving through that was a nightmare. British engineers had to crawl on their bellies in the dark, prodding the sand with bayonets. One wrong move and you were gone.

Montgomery vs. Rommel: A Clash of Egos

You've probably heard that Montgomery and Rommel were these tactical geniuses. They were, but they were also incredibly different humans. Rommel was a "front-line" guy. He liked to be in the middle of the chaos, making split-second decisions. This made him brilliant in a fluid battle but terrible at managing logistics. And logistics win wars.

📖 Related: Fire in Idyllwild California: What Most People Get Wrong

Montgomery was the opposite. He was cautious. Prickly. Some of his peers couldn't stand him. But he understood that the Battle of El Alamein wouldn't be won by clever maneuvers. It would be won by having more shells, more fuel, and more grit than the Germans. He spent months stockpiling. By the time the second battle started, the British Eighth Army had a 2-to-1 advantage in tanks and a massive edge in air support.

Operation Lightfoot—the opening phase—started with a bang. Literally. Over 800 guns opened fire at once on October 23, 1942. It was the largest artillery barrage since World War I. The noise was so loud that gunners' ears bled. They wanted to punch a hole through those minefields so the tanks could pour through.

The Turning Point: Operation Supercharge

It didn't work at first.

The minefields were deeper than expected. The tanks got bogged down. For a few days, it looked like a stalemate. This is the part of the Battle of El Alamein that people forget—the sheer uncertainty. Montgomery was under immense pressure from London. If he failed, he was done.

He pivoted. He launched "Operation Supercharge" on November 2. This was a concentrated thrust aimed at the Italian sectors and the thinning German lines. It was a meat grinder. The 9th Australian Division fought some of the most intense close-quarters combat of the entire campaign in a spot called "The Kidney." They took horrific casualties, but they drew in Rommel's last reserves.

Rommel was running out of everything. Fuel was the big one. Because the Royal Navy and the RAF were sinking Axis supply ships in the Mediterranean, Rommel’s tanks were literally running dry. He told Hitler he needed to retreat. Hitler, being Hitler, sent back a "Victory or Death" order. Rommel ignored it. He knew that if he stayed, his entire army would be captured. He retreated, leaving the Italians—who didn't have enough trucks to escape—to be taken prisoner by the thousands.

👉 See also: Who Is More Likely to Win the Election 2024: What Most People Get Wrong

Why It Matters Today

You might wonder why we still talk about a tank battle in the Egyptian sand from over eighty years ago. It’s because the Battle of El Alamein changed the psychology of the war. Before this, the German Wehrmacht seemed invincible. After this, the Allies knew they could win.

  • The End of the Beginning: This victory allowed the Allies to land in Morocco and Algeria (Operation Torch) just days later.
  • Logistical Mastery: It proved that winning a war isn't just about "bravery"; it's about supply chains and industrial output.
  • The "Desert Fox" Aura: It broke the myth of Rommel’s invincibility.

It's also a lesson in international cooperation. The "British" Eighth Army wasn't just British. It was an incredible mix. You had Australians, New Zealanders, South Africans, Indians, Free French, and Greeks. Without that coalition, the line at Alamein would have snapped.

The Reality of the Casualties

Let's talk numbers, but not the boring kind. The Eighth Army suffered about 13,500 casualties. The Axis lost about 30,000 to 50,000 (many were captured). But think about the debris. After the Battle of El Alamein, the desert was littered with thousands of burnt-out tanks and downed aircraft. Even today, people living in that region occasionally stumble upon unexploded ordnance from 1942. The "Devil's Gardens" still haunt parts of Egypt.

The common soldier's experience was one of flies. Millions of flies. They would swarm your food the second you opened a tin of "bully beef." If you’ve ever seen photos of soldiers from this era, they look skinny and weathered. They weren't just fighting Germans; they were fighting the environment itself.

Misconceptions About the Battle

One big mistake people make is thinking the Italians were "bad" soldiers. That’s a lazy stereotype. While their equipment was often outdated—their tanks were basically "mobile coffins"—units like the Folgore Paratroopers fought with incredible bravery at Alamein. They held their ground against British tanks until they literally ran out of ammunition. The defeat was a failure of leadership and industrial capacity, not a lack of courage on the front lines.

Another misconception is that it was a quick victory. It took twelve days of nonstop, high-intensity combat. It was a "dogfight," as Montgomery called it. It was exhausting.

✨ Don't miss: Air Pollution Index Delhi: What Most People Get Wrong

Practical Insights: Visiting the Site Today

If you're a history buff, you can actually visit El Alamein. It’s about a two-hour drive from Alexandria. It’s not a dusty ruin; it’s a place of immense somberness.

  1. The Commonwealth Cemetery: It’s hauntingly beautiful. Thousands of white headstones in the middle of the desert. You see names from every corner of the globe.
  2. The German Ossuary: A massive, fortress-like structure that holds the remains of thousands of German soldiers. It’s a very different vibe from the Commonwealth site—much more stark and brooding.
  3. The Italian Memorial: A tall, white marble tower that looks out over the sea. It’s incredibly elegant and serves as a reminder of the massive Italian presence in the campaign.

If you go, do it in the winter. The summer heat is still as punishing as it was in '42. Seeing the terrain helps you realize how impossible the task was. There is no cover. No trees. No hills. Just flat, open ground where you are a target for miles.


The Battle of El Alamein wasn't the end of the war, but as Churchill said, it was the "end of the beginning." It secured the Mediterranean, saved the Middle Eastern oil fields, and gave the Western Allies their first major land victory against the Nazis.

To really understand WWII, you have to look beyond the hedgerows of Normandy. You have to look at the sand.

Next steps for history enthusiasts:

  • Read "Alamein" by Stephen Bungay. It’s arguably the best modern account of the battle, focusing on the "friction" of war and how things actually felt on the ground.
  • Check out the Australian War Memorial’s digital archives. They have incredible first-hand accounts and photos specifically from the 9th Division's perspective.
  • Explore Google Earth around the coordinates 30.8333° N, 28.9500° E. You can still see the traces of old trench lines and vehicle tracks in some of the remote desert areas if you look closely enough.