The Ant and the Aardvark: Why This 1969 Deep Cut Still Slaps

The Ant and the Aardvark: Why This 1969 Deep Cut Still Slaps

If you spent any time watching Saturday morning cartoons in the late 20th century, you probably have a specific, nasal voice burned into your brain. It sounds like a world-weary guy from the Bronx who just wants a sandwich. That voice belongs to a nameless blue aardvark. He spent seventeen shorts trying—and failing spectacularly—to eat a very chill, very red ant named Charlie.

The Ant and the Aardvark wasn't just another Tom and Jerry knockoff. Honestly, it was weirder than that. Released by DePatie-Freleng Enterprises between 1969 and 1971, it hit screens during a transitional era for animation. The backgrounds were minimalist, almost like a jazz album cover, and the humor relied more on fast-talking wit than the bone-crunching violence of its predecessors.

The whole thing feels like a 1960s stand-up routine disguised as a kids' show.

Who Actually Made These Characters?

People often mistake these shorts for Looney Tunes or Hanna-Barbera. They aren't. They came from the same house that gave us the Pink Panther. David H. DePatie and Friz Freleng (the guy who basically built Yosemite Sam and Porky Pig) were the architects. When Warner Bros. shut down its original animation studio in 1963, Freleng didn't just retire. He teamed up with DePatie and started churning out some of the most stylistically bold animation of the decade.

The aesthetic of The Ant and the Aardvark is "limited animation" at its finest. You’ll notice the backgrounds are often just washes of color with skeletal drawings of grass or trees. It was cheap to produce, sure, but it also looked incredibly cool. It felt modern. It didn't try to look like a watercolor painting from the 1940s.

John W. Dunn wrote most of the episodes. If you look at his credits, he worked on The Pink Panther and later The Inspector. You can see the DNA. There is this rhythmic, almost musical timing to the jokes. The Aardvark doesn't just fall off a cliff; he explains why he’s about to fall off the cliff while he’s doing it.

The Jackie Mason and Dean Martin Connection

We have to talk about John Byner.

✨ Don't miss: Why October London Make Me Wanna Is the Soul Revival We Actually Needed

The show lives or dies on Byner's vocal performances. He voiced both lead characters. For the Aardvark, he did a pitch-perfect impersonation of comedian Jackie Mason. It’s a kvetching, neurotic, perpetually annoyed voice. He’s a predator who acts like a victim of his own hunger.

For Charlie the Ant, Byner pivoted to a laid-back, "cool cat" persona modeled after Dean Martin. Charlie is never stressed. He could be halfway down the Aardvark’s throat and he’d still find a way to make a quip. That dynamic—the high-strung loser versus the ultra-chill winner—is what makes the show hold up better than most of its contemporaries.

  • The Aardvark: Neurotic, blue, obsessed with "Aardvark etiquette."
  • Charlie: Red, wears a hat, survives by being smarter (and luckier).
  • The Backgrounds: Often solid neon colors that changed based on the mood.

It’s actually kinda funny how much the Jackie Mason estate reportedly disliked the impersonation. Mason supposedly wasn't thrilled about being associated with a cartoon bug-eater, but for a whole generation of kids, that was Jackie Mason. They didn't know the comedian; they just knew the blue guy with the vacuum nose.

Why the Animation Style Matters for SEO and History

If you look at the technical side, these shorts used a technique called "ink-line" and "hand-painted cels," but with a twist. The characters often had a colored outline instead of a standard black one. This gave them a softer, more integrated look against those psychedelic 1960s backgrounds.

Why does this matter? Because The Ant and the Aardvark represents the peak of the "theatrical short" before television completely took over the medium. These were originally shown in movie theaters before features. Think about that. You'd go see a gritty 70s drama, and first, you'd watch a blue aardvark try to suck an ant out of a knothole with a vacuum cleaner.

The music also set it apart. Doug Goodwin composed the score, and he used a jazz quintet. Most cartoons of the era were using stock music or orchestral swells. This show had a literal jazz band. It gave the chase scenes a swing that made the violence feel more like a dance.

🔗 Read more: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild

Misconceptions About the "Blue Aardvark"

One big thing people get wrong: they think he's a tapir or some weird blue elephant. He's specifically an aardvark. In fact, the show leans into this. He often references his "natural instincts" or how hard it is to be an aardvark in a world that doesn't respect the hustle.

Another common mix-up is the timeline. Because these aired so much on Cartoon Network and Boomerang in the 90s and 2000s, people think they were made then. Nope. These are older than The Flintstones' final seasons. They are artifacts of a very specific cultural moment where Borscht Belt humor met the burgeoning counter-culture aesthetic.

The Most Iconic Episodes You Probably Forgot

There are 17 of these. That’s it. It feels like hundreds because we saw them on loop, but it was a very limited run.

The Ant and the Aardvark (1969) was the pilot. It established the vacuum-snout mechanic immediately.
Hasty But Tasty (1969) is a classic because it involves the Aardvark trying to use logic against an ant that basically ignores the laws of physics.
Don't Hustle an Ant with Muscle (1970) introduced the idea of Charlie getting a "protector," which became a recurring trope in the series.

The series ended in 1971 with From Bed to Worse. By then, the studio was moving toward more television-centric production. The shorts were later edited into The Pink Panther Show, which is how most of us discovered them.

The Legacy of the Snout

So, what’s the actionable takeaway for a fan or a collector today? Honestly, go back and watch them with the sound up. Don’t just look at the slapstick. Listen to the wordplay. The Aardvark’s internal monologues are genuinely well-written comedy.

💡 You might also like: Is Lincoln Lawyer Coming Back? Mickey Haller's Next Move Explained

If you’re a creator, study the minimalism. You don’t need a $200 million budget and 4K textures to make something iconic. You need a distinct silhouette, a strong color palette, and a voice that people can recognize in a dark room.

The Aardvark never caught Charlie. He was never going to. But the charm wasn't in the meal; it was in the complaining he did while he was hungry.

How to Revisit the Series

  1. Check the Blu-ray sets: Kino Lorber released a high-definition restoration of all 17 shorts. It’s the only way to see the actual grain of the original film.
  2. Soundtrack hunt: Look for Doug Goodwin's jazz scores. They are some of the best examples of mid-century commercial jazz.
  3. Voice comparison: Watch an old Jackie Mason set on YouTube, then watch the Aardvark. The mimicry is actually terrifyingly accurate.

The show remains a masterclass in how to do "cheap" animation with "expensive" style. It’s a relic of a time when cartoons were trying to be a little bit more sophisticated than they had any right to be.


Next Steps for Enthusiasts

To truly appreciate the era, your next move should be comparing The Ant and the Aardvark to The Inspector (another DePatie-Freleng gem). Both shows use the same "frustrated professional" archetype, but where the Aardvark is a predator, the Inspector is a bumbling detective. Seeing how the same studio used the same limited animation style for two completely different genres—slapstick animal chase and mystery parody—will give you a much deeper understanding of why this studio was the king of the 1960s television aesthetic. If you're looking for the shorts today, they are most commonly found as segments within the Pink Panther collection on major streaming platforms or specialty physical media distributors like Kino Lorber.