Franz Werfel’s massive novel, The 40 Days of Musa Dagh, is a beast. Honestly, it’s one of those books that people claim to have read but usually just keep on their shelves to look smart. But if you actually crack it open, you realize it’s not just some dusty historical artifact. It’s a terrifyingly accurate blueprint of how ethnic cleansing works. It’s a thriller. It’s a psychological study of leadership under fire. Most importantly, it is a piece of fiction that quite literally changed the course of history, even influencing how people fought back during the Holocaust.
The book tells the story of a small group of Armenians who refused to be marched into the desert to die during the 1915 genocide. They climbed a mountain—Musa Dagh, or the "Mountain of Moses"—and held off the Ottoman army for over a month.
What Really Happened on the Mountain
Most people think the book is 100% history. It isn’t. Werfel was a novelist, not a journalist, but he did his homework. In 1930, while traveling in Damascus, he saw emaciated Armenian children working in carpet factories. It messed him up. He spent years researching the 1915 resistance at Musa Dagh, where about 4,000–5,000 villagers actually did retreat to the heights.
They weren't soldiers. They were farmers, teachers, and priests.
The leader in the book, Gabriel Bagradian, is a fictionalized version of real-life leaders like Moses Der Kalousdian. Bagradian is a Paris-educated intellectual who feels out of place among the peasants he’s leading. This tension drives the whole book. You’ve got people who are starving and outgunned, yet they’re arguing about social class while Turkish shells are raining down on them. It feels incredibly human. It’s messy. It’s not a polished hero story.
The actual siege lasted 53 days, not 40. Werfel chose 40 because of its biblical significance—the 40 days of the flood, 40 years in the wilderness. It gave the struggle a mythic weight.
📖 Related: Why American Beauty by the Grateful Dead is Still the Gold Standard of Americana
Why the Nazis Hated This Book So Much
If you want to know how powerful a book is, look at who tries to burn it. The 40 Days of Musa Dagh was published in Germany in 1933, just as Hitler was solidifying power. At first, it was a massive hit. But the Nazi party quickly realized that a story about a minority group resisting a murderous state was "dangerous" to their ideology.
The book was banned in 1934.
The Turkish government put immense pressure on Germany to suppress the book. Even back then, geopolitics played a role in what people were allowed to read. But the ban backfired. Copies were smuggled into Jewish ghettos across Europe. In the Warsaw Ghetto, young resistance fighters passed the book around like a manual. They saw themselves in the Armenians. They asked: If the Armenians could hold off an empire from a mountain, can we hold off the SS from these tenements?
It’s rare that a novel provides the literal inspiration for an armed uprising, but that’s exactly what happened.
The Movie That Almost Was (And Then Wasn't)
Hollywood has a weird, dark history with this book. In the 1930s, MGM bought the rights. They wanted to cast Clark Gable. Imagine that—the biggest star in the world playing Gabriel Bagradian.
👉 See also: Why October London Make Me Wanna Is the Soul Revival We Actually Needed
It never happened.
The Turkish government threatened to boycott all American films if MGM made the movie. The U.S. State Department actually stepped in and told the studio to shut it down. They didn't want to lose a strategic ally. This cycle repeated for decades. Every time a major studio tried to adapt The 40 Days of Musa Dagh, the project was killed by political pressure. It wasn't until the 1980s that a low-budget version was finally made, but it lacked the scale the story deserved.
This is why the book remains the primary way people experience this story. The "Musa Dagh" curse in Hollywood is a real thing that film historians like Edward Minasian have documented extensively.
Sorting Fact from Fiction
Werfel gets a lot right, but he leans into the "clash of civilizations" trope a bit hard. He portrays the Ottoman commanders as almost cartoonishly villainous at times, whereas modern historians like Taner Akçam or Ronald Grigor Suny provide a more complex (though no less horrific) look at the political machinery behind the genocide.
- The Resistance: Real. The villagers used old hunting rifles and rocks to defend the narrow passes.
- The Rescue: Real. A French cruiser, the Guichen, spotted their red cross flags and rescued the survivors.
- The Ending: Bittersweet. In the book, Bagradian stays behind. In real life, the leaders were evacuated with the rest of the people to Port Said in Egypt.
Werfel also captures the psychological exhaustion of the siege. People weren't just dying from bullets; they were dying from the stress of watching their children starve. He writes about the "hallucination of the mountain," where the survivors start to lose their grip on reality.
✨ Don't miss: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild
Why You Should Care in 2026
We live in an era of "disappearing" histories. The 40 Days of Musa Dagh is a reminder that survival isn't just about physical defense; it's about the refusal to be forgotten. The book is dense. It’s long. It has 50-page philosophical tangents. But it also has some of the most heart-pounding combat scenes in 20th-century literature.
It’s basically a masterclass in how to write about trauma without being exploitative.
The book teaches us that resistance is rarely a clean, heroic choice. It's usually a desperate, last-minute decision made by people who have run out of options. The characters in the novel aren't all saints. Some are cowards. Some are opportunistic. That’s what makes it feel real. Honestly, if you can get through the first 100 pages, you won't be able to put it down.
How to Approach the Text
If you’re going to read it, don't look for a modern beach read. This is a commitment.
- Get the Unabridged Version: Many older English translations are heavily edited. You want the full experience to understand the atmospheric dread Werfel was building.
- Look for the Historical Context: Keep a tab open for the actual timeline of the Armenian Genocide. Seeing how Werfel aligns his plot with the real-world deportations adds a layer of chill to the reading.
- Read the Ghetto Chronicles: Look up the diaries of Emanuel Ringelblum from the Warsaw Ghetto. Seeing how he mentions Musa Dagh gives the novel a haunting, meta-historical weight.
- Listen to the Music: The villagers on Musa Dagh had a specific tradition of folk music and drumming that Werfel describes. Finding recordings of traditional Armenian folk songs from the Hatay region (where the mountain is) makes the setting come alive.
This isn't just a book about a mountain in 1915. It's a book about what happens when the world decides a specific group of people no longer deserves to exist, and those people decide to say "no." It’s as relevant now as it was in 1933. Maybe more so.
Practical Steps for Further Discovery
To truly grasp the impact of The 40 Days of Musa Dagh, visit the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute online archives to see the original photographs of the survivors rescued by the French Navy. If you are interested in the literary impact, track down a copy of The Book Thief author Markus Zusak’s commentary on historical fiction, or explore the works of Primo Levi to see how "resistance literature" evolved after Werfel’s landmark publication. For those in the Los Angeles or Yerevan areas, the local libraries often hold specialized exhibits on the "Musa Ler" (Musa Dagh) descendants who still celebrate their ancestors' rescue every September with a traditional harissa feast.