Honestly, if you ask a casual fan about who won the 2002 NBA Finals, they’ll probably just shrug and say "the Lakers, duh." And they'd be right. It was a sweep. A quick, four-game execution of the New Jersey Nets that felt, at times, like a varsity squad beating up on the JV team. But man, that narrative is so surface-level it physically hurts.
The 2002 Finals represented the peak of the Shaq-Kobe era. It was the "Three-Peat." It was the moment Phil Jackson officially tied Red Auerbach for nine coaching rings. But looking back, the actual series against the Nets was almost an afterparty for the real Finals, which happened a week earlier in the Western Conference.
The Dynasty That Almost Died in Sacramento
Before we talk about the Nets getting steamrolled, we have to talk about the Kings. Everyone talks about the Kings. You can't mention the 2002 NBA Finals without acknowledging the Western Conference Finals against the Sacramento Kings, because that series was the real championship.
That seven-game war was brutal. It was controversial. It was, according to some fans who still wear "Vlade Divac" jerseys with pride, rigged. Whether you believe the conspiracy theories regarding Game 6 or not, the Lakers were pushed to the absolute brink. Robert Horry's legendary buzzer-beater in Game 4? That’s the only reason the Lakers even made it to the Finals. If Big Shot Rob misses that triple, Chris Webber is probably the one with a ring that year.
Instead, the Lakers survived. They went into Arco Arena for Game 7, won in overtime, and basically flew to New Jersey knowing the hard part was over. The Nets were good, don't get me wrong. Jason Kidd was playing out of his mind, turning a team that won 26 games the year before into a 52-win Eastern Conference powerhouse. But the East was weak. Really weak. The Lakers weren't just the defending champs; they were an Apex Predator that had already finished its biggest hunt.
Shaquille O'Neal Was Not Human
If you look at the box scores from that series, it reads like a horror movie for New Jersey’s frontcourt. Shaq was basically a cheat code. Todd MacCulloch and Jason Collins are respectable guys, but they were being asked to stop a 7'1", 325-pound wrecking ball in his absolute physical prime.
📖 Related: L.A.B. Golf OZ.1i: Why This Weird Putter Is Actually Changing the Game
Shaq averaged 36.3 points and 12.3 rebounds over those four games. He shot nearly 60% from the floor. He won his third straight Finals MVP, joining Michael Jordan as the only players to do that. It was bullying. Pure and simple. He was so dominant that the Nets' entire defensive strategy basically became "foul him and pray." It didn't work.
Kobe Bryant wasn't exactly a sidekick, either. He was 23 years old, averaging 26.8 points on 51% shooting. People forget how efficient Kobe was in 2002. He wasn't just taking "Mamba Mentality" fadeaways; he was dissecting defenses. He and Shaq were a two-headed monster that the Eastern Conference simply didn't have an answer for.
The New Jersey Perspective
The Nets were fun. Jason Kidd was at the height of his powers as a floor general. Kenyon Martin was jumping out of the gym. Kerry Kittles and Keith Van Horn provided the shooting. They played a fast, transition-heavy style that caught the East off guard.
But against the Lakers? The pace slowed down. The half-court game took over. And in the half-court, you have to deal with Shaq. Byron Scott, the Nets coach (and a former Laker great himself), tried everything. They tried to run. They tried to double-team. They tried to hack-a-Shaq.
Game 3 was the only time it felt like a real contest. The Nets were up late in the fourth quarter in East Rutherford. The crowd was losing its mind. They thought they had a chance to make it a series. Then Kobe and Shaq happened. A late run, a couple of massive buckets, and the Lakers walked out with a 106-103 win. That was the dagger. Once you go down 3-0 against a team with two Top 10 all-time players, you're toast.
Why This Win Still Matters Twenty Years Later
This wasn't just another ring. This was the end of an era.
The 2002 Lakers were the last team to "Three-Peat." Think about that. Since then, we've had the LeBron Heat, the Curry Warriors, and the Duncan Spurs. None of them won three in a row. It is incredibly hard to stay motivated, healthy, and cohesive for three straight years of June basketball. The physical and mental toll is astronomical.
By the time the Lakers won the 2002 NBA Finals, the friction between Shaq and Kobe was already starting to smoke. It hadn't caught fire yet—that would happen in 2003 and 2004—but you could see the cracks. The fact that they were able to put that aside and absolutely demolish a Finals opponent is a testament to how high their ceiling actually was.
👉 See also: Mid American Football Scores: Why the MAC Results Still Matter
It also solidified Phil Jackson's legacy. He had already won six with Jordan. Now he had three with Shaq. Critics used to say he could only win with MJ. By 2002, those critics were very, very quiet. He had figured out how to manage two massive egos and a supporting cast of savvy veterans like Rick Fox and Derek Fisher. It was a masterclass in psychology as much as basketball.
The Stats Nobody Remembers
Everyone knows Shaq's points, but look at the role players. Rick Fox was the glue. He didn't put up huge numbers, but his defense on the wing was essential. Derek Fisher was shooting 50% from three-point range during that series. These guys knew their roles perfectly.
The Nets, for their part, actually out-rebounded the Lakers in Game 4. They played hard. Kenyon Martin dropped 35 points in the final game. They didn't quit. They were just outclassed. It’s sort of like bringing a very fast car to a tank fight. You might be quicker, but once the tank hits you, it's over.
Misconceptions About the 2002 Sweep
A lot of people think the 2002 Lakers were the best version of that dynasty. I’d actually argue they weren't. The 2001 Lakers, who went 15-1 in the playoffs, were probably the "peak" team. In 2002, they were tired. They were injured. Shaq was dealing with toe issues that would eventually require surgery.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Chelsea Football Club Away Jersey Always Sparks Such a Massive Debate
The sweep makes it look easy, but the 2002 season was a grind. They didn't even have the best record in the league; that belonged to Sacramento. They were the #3 seed in the West! They had to win on the road in the Western Conference Finals. The 2002 Finals was essentially the "victory lap" for a team that had survived a near-death experience in the previous round.
How to Appreciate the 2002 Finals Today
If you want to understand the history of the league, you have to watch tape of Shaq in 2002. We haven't seen anything like it since. Not Dwight Howard, not Joel Embiid, not Nikola Jokic. Those guys are amazing, but they don't move people the way Shaq did. He was a force of nature.
Also, pay attention to Jason Kidd's passing. Even in a losing effort, his ability to manipulate the defense was incredible. He was the reason that Nets team was even there. He turned a group of "solid" players into a Finals contender through sheer force of will and vision.
What You Should Do Next
If you’re a basketball nerd or just someone looking to settle a bar debate, here is how you should actually dive into this:
- Watch the Game 4 Highlights: Don't just look at the score. Watch how the Lakers closed it out. Watch the body language of the Nets. You can see the moment they realize they’re playing against a different species.
- Research the 2002 Western Conference Finals: If you want the "real" story of that season, you have to look at Lakers vs. Kings. It is the context that makes the Finals sweep make sense.
- Analyze the Roster Builds: Look at how the Lakers surrounded two stars with specific role players. It’s a blueprint that teams still try (and often fail) to copy today.
- Compare Shaq’s 2002 Stats to Modern Bigs: Put Shaq’s 36 and 12 against any modern Finals performance. It’s jarring to see the discrepancy in interior dominance.
The 2002 NBA Finals might not have been the most competitive series in history, but it was the coronation of one of the greatest dynasties the sports world has ever seen. It was the moment the Lakers proved that even when they were vulnerable, they were still untouchable.