Everyone thinks they know the 1936 Berlin Olympics. You’ve seen the grainy footage of Jesse Owens blitzing the 100-meter dash while Adolf Hitler looks on with visible irritation from the stands. It’s the ultimate "triumph over hate" narrative. But the real drama—the stuff that actually qualifies as the race of the century—didn't happen in a solo sprint. It happened in the 4x100m relay, a race that shouldn't have featured Owens at all, and one that remains a lightning rod for controversy nearly a century later.
History is messy.
Most people assume the U.S. team just showed up and won everything. That's not how it went down. The 4x100m relay was a geopolitical powderkeg. It involved backroom deals, blatant anti-Semitism, and a last-minute roster swap that broke the hearts of two world-class athletes just because of who they were.
The Scandal in the Locker Room
The U.S. had two Jewish sprinters on the team: Marty Glickman and Sam Stoller. They had practiced their handoffs for weeks. They were fast. They were ready. Then, on the very morning of the heats, everything changed.
Assistant coach Dean Cromwell and head coach Lawson Robertson pulled them aside. The story they gave was that the Germans were hiding "super-sprinters" and they needed the absolute fastest men—Jesse Owens and Ralph Metcalfe—to secure the gold. It was a lie. Everyone knew the Germans weren't a threat to the U.S. depth.
Glickman, who was only 18 at the time, later said he knew exactly what was happening. The U.S. Olympic Committee, led by Avery Brundage, didn't want to embarrass Hitler by having two Jewish men standing on the podium in the heart of Berlin. Brundage was a known Nazi sympathizer who had fought hard against a U.S. boycott of the games. By pulling Glickman and Stoller, the U.S. officials basically did the Nazi party a massive favor.
Owens actually protested. He reportedly told the coaches, "Let Marty and Sam run. I've had enough. I've won my three gold medals."
✨ Don't miss: The Division 2 National Championship Game: How Ferris State Just Redrew the Record Books
Cromwell told him to shut up and do what he was told.
39.8 Seconds of Pure Dominance
When the starting gun finally fired for the final on August 9, 1936, the tension was thick enough to choke on. This was the race of the century because it wasn't just about speed; it was about the crushing reality of 1930s politics meeting raw athletic talent.
Owens took the first leg. He didn't just run; he evaporated the competition.
By the time he handed the baton to Ralph Metcalfe, the U.S. was already several meters ahead. Metcalfe, a man who would later serve in Congress, ran a blistering second leg. Then came Foy Draper, and finally Frank Wykoff.
The U.S. team crossed the line in 39.8 seconds.
That was a world record. It stood for 20 years.
🔗 Read more: Por qué los partidos de Primera B de Chile son más entretenidos que la división de honor
To put that in perspective, they were running on cinders, not the high-tech synthetic tracks we use today. Their shoes were heavy leather with long spikes. They didn't have starting blocks that adjusted to the millimeter. They dug holes in the dirt with trowels.
The silver medalists? Italy. They finished in 41.1 seconds. That is an eternity in a relay. The Germans, the supposed "threat" that necessitated pulling the Jewish athletes, finished third with a 41.2. The U.S. didn't just win; they humiliated the field.
Why We Still Talk About This
Honestly, the numbers are only half the story. The 1936 relay is the race of the century because it exposes the duality of sports. On one hand, you had the most dominant athletic performance in history. On the other, you had a moral failure by the American athletic establishment.
Marty Glickman went on to become a legendary sports broadcaster. He never forgot being pulled from that race. Sam Stoller, however, was devastated. He quit sprinting shortly after returning to the States.
It's a reminder that even in "the good old days," sports were never just about the clock.
The Demographic Breakdown of the 1936 Games
While the U.S. sent a diverse team, the internal politics were incredibly fractured. Consider these statistics from the 1936 U.S. Olympic delegation:
💡 You might also like: South Carolina women's basketball schedule: What Most People Get Wrong
- Total Athletes: 312
- African American Athletes: 18 (including 10 in track and field)
- Jewish Athletes: 5 (before Glickman and Stoller were benched)
- Gold Medals won by Black Athletes: 8 (Owens won 4 of these)
The irony is staggering. Hitler wanted the games to prove Aryan superiority. Instead, the U.S. team—carried largely by the Black athletes the Nazis considered "subhuman"—obliterated the competition. Yet, those same athletes returned to a segregated America where they couldn't even walk through the front door of some hotels.
Modern Lessons from the Cinder Track
What can we actually learn from this today? It’s easy to look back and judge the 1930s, but the pressures haven't changed that much.
First, performance usually speaks louder than politics, but it can't always erase the damage done behind the scenes. The world record set in Berlin was a technical masterpiece of sprinting, but it came at the cost of two men's Olympic dreams.
Second, the "Race of the Century" isn't always the one where the finish is the closest. Sometimes it's the race where the gap between the winner and the loser represents a total shift in how the world views human potential.
The 1936 relay proved that "unbeatable" records are meant to be smashed, even under the worst possible circumstances.
Actionable Steps for History and Sports Buffs
If you want to truly understand the impact of the race of the century, don't just watch the 10-second clips on YouTube. Dig deeper into the primary sources.
- Read Glickman's Memoir: Check out "The Fastest Kid on the Block." It provides a firsthand account of the locker room betrayal that the official Olympic films conveniently leave out.
- Analyze the Physics: Look at the biomechanics of the 1936 sprinters. Despite the primitive equipment, their turnover rate was nearly identical to modern sprinters. It shows that human evolution in speed is largely a result of technology (tracks and shoes), not just biology.
- Visit the Records: Search the Olympic Studies Centre archives. They have the original heat sheets and lap times that show just how much of a lead Owens gave the team in those first 100 meters.
- Study the 1936 Boycott Movement: To understand why Brundage made the choices he did, look into the 1935-36 "Fair Play" debates in the Amateur Athletic Union (AAU). It explains the political climate that led to the roster swap.
The 1936 relay remains a massive moment because it was perfect and tainted all at once. It gave us a record that lasted two decades and a story of injustice that has lasted almost a century. We shouldn't look away from either part of that history.
Speed is objective, but the stories we tell about it are anything but.