So, you want to try testing Swift on Windows. Most people think Swift is just for Mac or iOS. They assume it's trapped in the Apple ecosystem, guarded by the ghost of Steve Jobs. That's just not true anymore. Swift has been open source since 2015, and the Windows port has actually become quite stable, though it still feels like a bit of a "Wild West" scenario compared to the polished Xcode experience.
It's weird. You’re using a language designed for high-level safety and speed, but you’re running it on an OS that historically didn't care about it.
Setting this up isn't just about downloading a .exe and hitting "Go." Honestly, if you expect a one-click installer to solve your life, you're going to be disappointed. You have to get your hands dirty with the toolchain.
The Reality of the Windows Swift Toolchain
The Swift project officially supports Windows, but "supported" is a heavy word. It means the compiler works. It means the core libraries like dispatch and Foundation are there. But it doesn't mean your favorite third-party library will just work out of the box.
📖 Related: Ring Motion Light with Camera: Why Most People Overlook the Setup That Actually Works
If you’re coming from a Mac, the first thing you’ll notice is the lack of a proper IDE. No Xcode here. You're basically living in Visual Studio Code (VS Code) or the command line. Most developers I know use the Swift extension for VS Code, which is maintained by the Swift Server Work Group. It’s actually decent. It gives you SourceKit-LSP support, which means you get code completion and error highlighting that doesn't totally suck.
To get started with testing Swift on Windows, you need the actual toolchain from Swift.org. Don't go looking for third-party mirrors. Go straight to the source. You’ll also need the "Desktop development with C++" workload from the Visual Studio Installer. Why? Because Swift on Windows relies on the MSVC (Microsoft Visual C++) linker and the Windows SDK. Without those, the compiler is just a paperweight.
It's a lot of gigabytes. Be ready for that.
Why Bother With This?
You might ask why anyone would do this. Cross-platform development is the obvious answer. If you're building a backend in Swift (which is becoming surprisingly popular thanks to frameworks like Vapor), you might want your Windows-using contributors to be able to test logic locally.
There's also the niche but growing world of Windows-native apps written in Swift. Using the WinSDK module, you can actually call Win32 APIs directly from Swift. It looks bizarre. You see Swift code—clean, modern—calling MessageBoxW. It’s like a weird digital fusion.
Testing Swift on Windows: The Compiler and The Shell
Let's talk about the command line. You aren't using zsh. You're likely in PowerShell or the Developer Command Prompt for VS 2022. This is where most people trip up. If you don't run your shell with the correct environment variables, swiftc will just stare at you blankly.
When you're testing Swift on Windows, the swift test command is your best friend and your worst enemy. It uses the Swift Package Manager (SPM). SPM on Windows has come a long way. It handles dependencies, compiles your targets, and runs your XCTest suites.
Wait. XCTest on Windows?
Yes, it exists. But it’s "CoreXCTest." It behaves slightly differently than the version on macOS. On Mac, XCTest uses Objective-C runtime magic to find your test methods. Windows doesn't have that. For a long time, you had to manually maintain a LinuxMain.swift or similar discovery files. Thankfully, recent versions of Swift have improved test discovery, but you still occasionally run into issues where a test just... doesn't run. No error. Just silence.
Dealing with the Linker
Errors. You'll see a lot of them. Specifically, linker errors.
"Linker command failed with exit code 1104." You'll see that in your dreams. Usually, it means you’re missing a search path for a system library. When testing Swift on Windows, you have to be very deliberate about how you define your Package.swift file. You might need to use conditional compilation:
#if os(Windows)// Windows-specific logic or paths#endif
It’s messy but necessary.
The VS Code Setup That Actually Works
Don't just install the Swift extension and hope for the best. You need to configure it. Specifically, make sure the path to the Swift toolchain is in your system PATH environment variable before you open VS Code.
- Install the Swift Extension by the Swift Server Work Group.
- Install CodeLLVM. This is the debugger. Without it, you can't hit breakpoints.
- Open your project folder (the one containing
Package.swift).
Once you're in, look at the bottom bar. It should show the "Swift" status. If it says "Swift: Initializing," wait. If it says "Swift: Error," check your paths.
Debugging is... okay. It's not Xcode. It’s slower. Stepping through code feels like walking through molasses sometimes, especially if you have a large project. But it works. You can inspect variables, look at the call stack, and do most things you'd expect from a modern debugger.
Performance and Pitfalls
Swift is fast. On Windows, it stays fast. The LLVM backend does a great job of optimizing code for x86_64 or ARM64 Windows machines. However, file I/O can be a bottleneck. NTFS handles many small files differently than APFS or ext4. If your Swift tests involve creating and deleting thousands of small files, you’ll notice a lag.
Also, watch out for path lengths. Windows still has that pesky 260-character path limit in some contexts. If your Swift package has deeply nested folders, SPM might choke. You can enable long paths in the Windows Registry, and you really should if you're doing serious development.
The Foundation Headache
The Foundation library is the core of most Swift apps. On Windows, it’s a re-implementation. While the Swift team has worked incredibly hard on the new "Swift-native" Foundation, some older parts of the library might behave differently.
For instance, date formatting or complex URL sessions might have subtle bugs that only appear on Windows. This is exactly why testing Swift on Windows is critical. You cannot assume that because your tests pass on a Mac, they will pass on Windows. You'll find edge cases in file system permissions and networking stacks that are unique to the Microsoft world.
Real World Example: Porting a Library
I saw a developer trying to port a Markdown parser written in Swift to Windows. The logic was pure Swift—no weird dependencies. It should have been easy.
It wasn't.
The problem was the test data. The tests loaded .md files from a Resources folder. On Windows, the way SPM handles resource bundles is different. The code couldn't find the files. They had to use #if os(Windows) to change how the file paths were constructed at runtime.
This is the kind of stuff you only find when you actually sit down and run the tests on a PC.
Essential Tools for Your Windows Swift Workflow
You need more than just the compiler. Here's a disorganized list of stuff that makes it tolerable:
- Git for Windows: Obviously. But make sure you set
core.autocrlftoinputorfalse. Swift files with Windows line endings (CRLF) sometimes confuse the compiler or the linter. - Windows Terminal: Don't use the old
cmd.exe. The new Windows Terminal handles ANSI colors and Unicode much better, which is helpful for Swift's colorful compiler output. - A Standard C++ Build Environment: As mentioned, Visual Studio 2022 is the standard. Don't try to use MinGW; Swift wants the native MSVC environment.
What's the Catch?
The catch is the ecosystem. If your project depends on a library that uses Glibc (Linux) or Darwin (Mac), it won't compile on Windows unless someone has written a WinSDK equivalent.
Many popular Swift packages are still Mac-centric. You'll find yourself submitting Pull Requests to fix Windows builds for other people's libraries. It's a bit of a chore, but hey, that's how open source grows.
Actionable Steps to Get Testing Right Now
If you're ready to stop reading and start coding, do this:
- Download the Swift Toolchain: Go to Swift.org and grab the latest Windows installer.
- Install Visual Studio 2022: Choose the "C++ Desktop Development" workload. This is non-negotiable.
- Set Environment Variables: Ensure
C:\Library\Developer\Toolchains\unknown-Asserts-development.xctoolchain\usr\bin(or your specific path) is in your System PATH. - Validate: Open a fresh PowerShell and type
swift --version. If it spits out a version number, you're winning. - Initialize a Project: Create a new folder, run
swift package init --type executable, and then immediately runswift test.
If that test passes, you’ve successfully set up the environment for testing Swift on Windows. From here, it's just a matter of porting your code and fixing the inevitable platform-specific bugs.
Don't expect it to be perfect. Expect it to be a bit clunky. But also expect it to be rewarding when you see your Swift code running natively on a completely different operating system. It’s a great way to prove your code is actually robust and platform-independent.
Check your dependencies early. If you rely on something like NIO or Vapor, check their Windows compatibility status on GitHub. Most of the heavy hitters are moving toward full Windows support, but it's always better to know before you start the porting process.
Get to work. The Windows ecosystem needs more Swift.