Ever sat around wondering why we don't just keep the presidents we actually like? It seems kinda weird when you think about it. If someone is doing a killer job, why force them out just because the calendar hit eight years?
That's the big debate around term limits for US president. Most people think it's just a "two and done" deal.
The reality is way messier.
It involves a guy who stayed for four terms, a bunch of nervous politicians in the 1940s, and a constitutional amendment that has a few weird loopholes most people totally miss. Honestly, the whole thing started because we were terrified of accidentally electing a king.
Where the 22nd Amendment Actually Came From
For about 150 years, the US didn't have a law saying you had to leave. George Washington just decided he was tired and wanted to go back to Mount Vernon. He set a "gentleman's agreement" that two terms was plenty.
Then came Franklin D. Roosevelt.
FDR didn't just break the tradition; he shattered it. He won in 1932, 1936, 1940, and 1944. People loved him because of the New Deal and World War II, but his opponents were freaking out. They saw a "President-for-life" scenario unfolding. After he died in office in 1945, Congress moved fast. They didn't want another 12-year (or longer) presidency.
💡 You might also like: Wisconsin Judicial Elections 2025: Why This Race Broke Every Record
The 22nd Amendment was ratified in 1951. It basically says: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice."
But there is a catch.
If a Vice President takes over because the President dies or resigns, and they serve two years or less of that term, they can still run for two full terms of their own. That means a person could technically serve for 10 years. If they serve even one day over two years of the predecessor's term, they are capped at one more election.
The Loophole Everyone Debates
Here is where things get "Law & Order" levels of complicated.
The 22nd Amendment says you can't be elected more than twice. It doesn't explicitly say you can't be President.
Legal nerds like to argue about whether a two-term president could be V.P. and then take over if the sitting president resigns. The 12th Amendment says no person "constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President."
📖 Related: Casey Ramirez: The Small Town Benefactor Who Smuggled 400 Pounds of Cocaine
Is a two-term president "ineligible" to hold the office, or just "ineligible to be elected"?
Most scholars say the intent is clear—you're out. But the text is just vague enough that if someone really wanted to push it, we'd be headed straight for a Supreme Court showdown.
Why some people hate term limits
- The "Lame Duck" Problem: In their second term, a president loses power. Why listen to them? They're leaving anyway.
- Experience Matters: Running a country is hard. Why fire the person who finally figured out where the light switches are?
- It’s Undemocratic: If 60% of the country wants the same person again, why does a piece of paper from 1951 get to say "no"?
Why others think they're vital
- Preventing Tyranny: Power corrupts. Stay in the White House for 20 years, and you might start thinking you own the place.
- Fresh Blood: New ideas keep the country from stagnating.
- The "King" Factor: Thomas Jefferson was terrified that without limits, the presidency would basically become a hereditary monarchy.
Recent Attempts to Change the Rules
Don't think this is just a history lesson. It's happening right now.
In January 2025, Representative Andrew Ogles (R-TN) introduced House Joint Resolution 29. He wants to change the 22nd Amendment to allow for three terms. His specific proposal would allow a third term but bar anyone from serving three consecutive terms.
It’s a long shot.
Amending the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate, plus three-fourths of the states have to say yes. Since 1789, there have been roughly 12,000 proposed amendments. Only 27 have made it.
👉 See also: Lake Nyos Cameroon 1986: What Really Happened During the Silent Killer’s Release
The odds are not great for anyone wanting more than eight years.
The Reality of Term Limits for US President
At the end of the day, term limits for US president are the ultimate "break glass in case of emergency" tool for democracy. They ensure that no matter how much people love or hate a leader, the seat eventually opens up.
It forces the country to look forward instead of clinging to the past.
Whether you think it's a safeguard or a straightjacket, it's the law of the land. It defines how power moves in Washington. Without it, the political landscape of the last 70 years would look completely unrecognizable.
Practical Steps to Stay Informed
If you want to track how these rules might change or see how they affect the current election cycle, keep an eye on these specific areas:
- Watch Article V Proposals: Check the Congressional Record for "Joint Resolutions" aimed at the 22nd Amendment.
- Follow Constitutional Scholarship: Look for deep dives from the National Constitution Center or the Heritage Foundation, as they often host debates on the merits of executive tenure.
- Understand the Succession Act: Knowing the line of succession (Speaker, President Pro Tempore, etc.) helps you see how the "10-year rule" could actually play out in a crisis.
The system is designed to be slow and frustrating on purpose. It’s the price we pay to make sure no one person stays at the top forever.