You’ve probably heard people argue about this at Thanksgiving or seen the spicy threads on X (formerly Twitter). One side says we need fresh blood in the White House to keep things from getting stagnant. The other side thinks if a leader is doing an amazing job, why should we force them out just because of a calendar date? Honestly, term limits for president are one of those things most of us take for granted, like they've always been there.
They haven't.
👉 See also: Why People Are Searching for What Was Written on the Bullets That Killed Charlie Kirk
For nearly 150 years, the United States didn't actually have a law saying you couldn't be president for life. It was just a vibe. A "gentleman’s agreement." George Washington started it by walking away after two terms, basically because he was exhausted and didn't want to look like a king. Most people followed his lead until FDR came along and decided four terms sounded better than two. That's when things got real, and the 22nd Amendment was born.
How the 22nd Amendment Actually Works
Basically, the 22nd Amendment is the rulebook. It says no person can be elected to the office of the President more than twice. Simple, right? Well, sort of.
There is this weird little loophole or "math problem" regarding vice presidents. If a VP takes over because a president dies or resigns, they can still run for two full terms of their own—but only if they served two years or less of the previous guy's term. If they served more than two years of the "leftover" term, they can only be elected once.
The 10-Year Max
Mathematically, the absolute longest any person could ever be president under current law is 10 years. That’s two years of someone else’s term plus two full four-year terms of their own.
People often ask: "Could a two-term president become Vice President?"
It’s a legal grey area that makes constitutional scholars’ heads spin. The 12th Amendment says no person "constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President." Since a two-term president can't be elected again, many experts like those at the National Constitution Center argue they probably can't be VP either. But because the 22nd Amendment specifically uses the word "elected" rather than "serve," some folks think you could technically sneak in through the back door of succession. The Supreme Court hasn't touched that one yet.
💡 You might also like: Why Every Teacher Fired in Texas Lately Seems to Spark a National Firestorm
Why Do We Even Have These Limits?
The logic is pretty straightforward: power corrupts.
If you stay in the Oval Office for 20 years, you aren't just a president anymore; you're a fixture. You've appointed every judge, controlled the military for two decades, and likely built a political machine that’s impossible to topple. Thomas Jefferson was actually terrified of this. He wrote in 1821 that without a limit, the office would eventually become a "hereditary monarchy."
He wasn't wrong to be worried. Look at countries without these guardrails. You see "presidents" who have been in power since the 90s.
The Argument for Repeal
On the flip side, some people think term limits for president are actually undemocratic. Why? Because they take the choice away from the voters. If 60% of the country wants "President X" to keep going, why should a piece of paper from 1951 stop them?
✨ Don't miss: Current Weather in Chicago Illinois: Why the Windy City Just Broke a 10-Year Record
Alexander Hamilton actually hated the idea of term limits. He thought it would lead to:
- Lame Duck Syndrome: A president in their last term has less power because everyone knows they're leaving.
- Lost Experience: You're forcing out the person who knows the most about the job right when they're at their peak.
- Instability: Constant turnover can make foreign policy messy.
What Most People Get Wrong
One huge misconception is that the 22nd Amendment was some ancient "Founding Father" idea. It wasn't. It was a 1947 reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt. Republicans (and many conservative Democrats) were spooked that FDR had stayed in power through the Great Depression and World War II. They wanted to make sure no one could ever do that again.
Another myth? That a president can "skip a term" and come back.
Nope. The limit is a lifetime total of two elected terms. It doesn't matter if you take a break for four years or forty. Once you've been elected twice, you're done.
The Global Context: It's Messy Out There
The US is actually pretty strict. In many parliamentary systems, like the UK or Australia, a Prime Minister can stay as long as their party keeps winning.
In some places, leaders try to "reset the clock." We've seen this in various countries where a president passes a new constitution and then claims their previous terms "don't count" under the new rules. It's a classic move for staying in power. In the US, our amendment process is so incredibly hard—requiring two-thirds of Congress and three-quarters of the states—that "resetting the clock" is almost impossible.
Actionable Insights for the Informed Citizen
If you're following the news in 2026, you'll likely hear whispers about changing these rules, especially when a popular (or controversial) president is nearing the end of their second term. Here is how to navigate those headlines:
- Check the math: Remember the 10-year rule. If a VP steps up, look at the calendar. Did they serve more than 24 months of the previous term? That determines their future eligibility.
- Follow the Amendments: Any real change to term limits for president requires a Constitutional Amendment. If you see a "bill" in Congress trying to change it, know that it's just the first step of a very long, very difficult marathon.
- Watch the Courts: Keep an eye on any cases regarding the "backdoor" to the presidency (the VP or Speaker of the House route). That’s where the real legal drama is hiding.
- Research State Limits: Many states have different rules for Governors. Comparing how your state handles executive limits can give you a lot of perspective on whether they actually help or hurt local government.
Understanding these rules is about more than just trivia; it's about knowing how the "off switch" on power works in a democracy. It's the difference between a leader and a ruler.