You’ve seen the image a thousand times. A witness stands in a wood-paneled courtroom, hand raised, the other resting on a thick, black leather book. Or maybe it’s a President on a cold January morning. It feels ancient. It feels mandatory. But honestly, the whole act of swearing in on a bible is way more complicated than most people realize. We treat it like a legal requirement, yet the U.S. Constitution literally never mentions a Bible. Not once.
It’s a tradition that’s survived centuries of legal challenges, cultural shifts, and a lot of confused jurors. Why? Because humans love a spectacle. We like the idea that a person is tethered to something bigger than themselves when they're about to tell a truth—or a lie.
The Religious Test That Isn't There
Most people assume that if you're in court, you have to use the Bible. That’s just not true. The Founding Fathers were actually pretty paranoid about religious requirements for office. Look at Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution. It explicitly states that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
That’s a huge deal.
It means that while swearing in on a bible is the "standard" visual, it’s legally optional. If you’re an atheist, a secular humanist, or just someone who thinks mixing church and state is messy, you can "affirm." Affirming is the secular version of swearing. No God mentioned. No holy book required. You’re just giving your word under the penalty of perjury.
It’s weirdly egalitarian.
In 1961, the Supreme Court weighed in on this with Torcaso v. Watkins. Roy Torcaso wanted to be a notary public in Maryland but refused to declare a belief in God. The court basically said, "You can't do that." They ruled that Maryland's requirement was unconstitutional. Since then, the right to opt out of the Bible has been set in stone.
When Presidents Break the Mold
We usually see the President-elect using a family Bible. Abraham Lincoln used one. JFK used one. But not everyone follows the script.
John Quincy Adams, our sixth president, reportedly took the oath of office on a law book containing the Constitution. He felt that the oath was a legal matter, not a religious one. He wanted to emphasize that he was bound by the laws of the land.
Then there’s Teddy Roosevelt. After William McKinley was assassinated in 1901, Roosevelt was rushed into office. In the chaos of the moment, he didn't use a Bible at all. He just raised his hand and took the oath. He’s the only president who definitely didn't use a book. Some people say Lyndon B. Johnson used a Catholic missal found on Air Force One after JFK died, mostly because it was the only thing remotely "holy" nearby in a moment of national trauma.
✨ Don't miss: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think
More recently, we’ve seen members of Congress use different texts. Keith Ellison and Rashida Tlaib used a Quran—specifically, one that belonged to Thomas Jefferson. That caused a bit of a stir, but it’s perfectly legal. Others have used the Tanakh, or even just a copy of the Constitution itself.
It’s about what holds weight for the individual.
The Psychology of the "Oath"
Why do we keep doing it? Why keep swearing in on a bible if it isn’t legally necessary?
Psychology plays a massive role. There’s something called "the power of the ritual." When you place your hand on an object you consider sacred, your brain registers the gravity of the situation. It’s a "pre-commitment device." Basically, you’re making it harder for yourself to lie because you’ve signaled to your community—and your own conscience—that this moment matters.
Courts know this. Even though they can't force you to use a Bible, they still like the ritual because it reminds everyone in the room that the stakes are high. If you lie after swearing in, it’s not just a social faux pas. It’s perjury. You go to jail.
The Problem With the "So Help Me God" Phrase
You’ve heard the phrase. It’s the kicker at the end of the oath. But did you know that "So help me God" isn't actually in the presidential oath prescribed by the Constitution?
The Constitution provides the exact words: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." That's it.
Legend says George Washington added "So help me God" at his first inauguration, but historians like Peter R. Henriques have pointed out there’s zero contemporary evidence for that. It likely became a tradition much later, probably during the mid-19th century. We just kept doing it because it sounded "presidential."
Different Books for Different Folks
If you’re called for jury duty or to testify, the clerk might instinctively reach for the Bible. You have every right to say no.
🔗 Read more: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened
In some jurisdictions, if you don't want the Bible, you can bring your own text. I’ve heard of people asking to use a copy of The Origin of Species or even a local law book. Most judges won't care as long as you understand that you are legally bound to tell the truth.
- The Bible: Still the default in 90% of US courtrooms.
- The Quran: Increasingly common and respected.
- The Torah/Tanakh: Used by Jewish witnesses and officials.
- The Constitution: A popular choice for those who want to keep religion out of the room.
- Nothing (Affirmation): Just a raised hand and a verbal promise.
Honestly, the "nothing" option is growing. As society becomes more secular, the sight of a Bible in a government building feels "old school" to some. To others, it’s a vital connection to the country’s roots.
International Perspectives: Not Just a US Thing
We aren't the only ones obsessed with this. In the UK, witnesses in court can choose to swear on the Holy Bible (New Testament for Christians, Old Testament for Jews) or the Quran, or the Guru Granth Sahib.
In some countries, like Australia, you can choose to make a secular "solemn affirmation." It carries the exact same weight. If you go to a court in Singapore, you’ll see a variety of religious texts available to accommodate the diverse population.
The core idea is the same everywhere: find the thing that makes the person feel most obligated to tell the truth.
Common Misconceptions About Swearing In
People get a lot of this wrong. They really do.
Myth: You can't be an atheist and hold office because you have to swear on a Bible.
Wrong. This was settled by the Constitution and reinforced by the Supreme Court. No religious test means no religious test.
Myth: The oath is invalid if you don't touch the book.
Wrong. The physical act is symbolic. The legal weight comes from the verbal agreement and the presence of an authorized official to witness it.
Myth: You have to say "So help me God."
Wrong. You can leave it out. Most officials will ask you if you want to include it or not.
💡 You might also like: What Category Was Harvey? The Surprising Truth Behind the Number
Myth: A witness can get out of a perjury charge if they swore on the "wrong" book.
Nice try, but no. Courts have consistently ruled that if you represented yourself as taking a binding oath, you are bound by it, regardless of which book was under your hand.
How to Handle Your Own Swearing-In Moment
If you ever find yourself in a position where you need to be sworn in—whether it's for a deposition, a court appearance, or taking a public office—you have total control over how it happens.
Don't feel pressured by the "standard" way of doing things. If you aren't religious, ask to "affirm." You don't need to make a big scene about it. Just say, "I'd prefer to affirm, please." The clerk will know exactly what to do. They’ll change the wording from "Do you swear..." to "Do you solemnly, sincerely, and truly declare and affirm..."
If you are religious but the Bible isn't your text, you are usually allowed to bring your own. It’s a good idea to clear this with the court clerk or the sergeant-at-arms beforehand just so there aren't any awkward delays.
The Future of the Tradition
Will we still be swearing in on a bible in fifty years?
Probably. Tradition has a weird way of sticking around long after its practical necessity has faded. It provides a sense of continuity. When a new leader takes an oath on a Bible that has been in their family for generations, it connects them to their ancestors and their community.
But we’re definitely seeing a shift toward more personalized or secular options. The "human-centric" approach is winning out. We’re moving away from the idea that God is the only thing that can keep a person honest and moving toward the idea that a person's own integrity—and the threat of legal consequences—is enough.
Ultimately, the book is just paper and ink. The real power lies in the promise. Whether you're using a King James Bible, a copy of the Bill of Rights, or nothing at all, the moment you say "I do," you've entered into a contract with the truth.
Actionable Steps for Your Legal Rights
- Know your state laws: While the US Constitution covers federal roles, some states have their own specific language. However, federal law usually trumps any state-level religious requirements.
- Communicate early: If you are testifying, tell your lawyer or the court officer your preference for affirming vs. swearing at least 24 hours in advance.
- Understand Perjury: Remember that the legal consequences of lying are identical whether you use a Bible or not. The "ritual" doesn't change the law.
- Respect the setting: Regardless of your personal beliefs, the oath-taking process is a formal legal procedure. Treat it with the appropriate gravity to avoid "contempt of court" issues.
The act of swearing in on a bible remains one of the most visible overlaps between ancient faith and modern law. It’s a reminder that even in a digital age, we still find value in the physical, the symbolic, and the sacred.