The fog hasn't lifted. Decades later, the San Francisco Bay Area is still haunted by a shadow in a hood with a crosshair on his chest. We’ve all seen the sketches. We’ve all heard the chilling, taunting letters sent to the Chronicle. But when you actually look at the suspects of the Zodiac Killer, you realize how messy the truth really is. It’s not a neat puzzle. It’s a jagged, frustrating heap of "almosts" and "could-be’s" that have ruined lives and obsessed generations of investigators.
Honestly, the case is a nightmare for forensic science. DNA was barely a concept in the late sixties. Fingerprints were smudged or questionable. Eye-witness accounts? They vary so much you’d think they were describing three different men. This is why the list of names keeps growing even as the trail goes cold.
Arthur Leigh Allen: The Only "Good" Suspect?
If you’ve watched the David Fincher movie or read Robert Graysmith’s books, you know Arthur Leigh Allen. He is the heavyweight champion of the suspects of the Zodiac Killer. Why? Because the coincidences are genuinely terrifying.
Allen wore a Zodiac brand watch. He talked to friends about wanting to kill people with a flashlight attached to a firearm—a specific detail from the Lake Herman Road or Blue Rock Springs attacks. He was in the area. He had a history of child molestation, which, while not a signature of the Zodiac, certainly marked him as a man with a dark, predatory internal world. Detective Dave Toschi, the legendary SFPD investigator, famously said that everything pointed to Allen except the physical evidence.
That's the rub.
The DNA found on the back of the Zodiac stamps didn't match Allen. His handwriting didn't match the letters. His palm prints didn't match the ones lifted from Paul Stine’s cab. You can argue that Allen had friends lick his stamps or that he was ambidextrous, but in a court of law, that doesn't fly. He died in 1992, just as the police were closing in on him again, leaving us with a giant question mark that will probably never be erased.
Gary Francis Poste and the Case for the Air Force Veteran
Recently, a group called the Case Breakers made headlines by naming Gary Francis Poste as the man behind the mask. They pointed to scars on Poste’s forehead that supposedly match the lines on the 1969 police sketch. It sounds compelling. People love a "case closed" moment.
✨ Don't miss: Kaitlin Marie Armstrong: Why That 2022 Search Trend Still Haunts the News
But the FBI and local police haven't jumped on the bandwagon.
Poste was a veteran with a violent streak, and the Case Breakers claim they have forensic evidence from his darkroom. They also believe he was involved in the 1966 murder of Cheri Jo Bates in Riverside, a crime many link to the Zodiac. Critics, however, say the forehead "scars" on the sketch are actually just frown lines drawn by the artist. It's a classic example of how deep-seated the desire is to find a face to match the monster. Sometimes we see what we want to see.
Rick Marshall and the Cinematic Connection
Then there's Rick Marshall. If the Zodiac was a movie buff—and many think he was, given his references to The Most Dangerous Game and his theatrical costumes—Marshall fits a certain vibe. He lived in a basement. He worked at a silent movie theater. He had a ham radio.
The handwriting? Some experts thought it was a dead ringer. But again, there’s no "smoking gun." No bloody shirt. No weapon. Marshall remains one of those "vibe" suspects who populates the darker corners of message boards but lacks the hard evidence to move the needle in a modern lab.
Why the DNA hasn't solved it yet
You’d think in 2026, we’d have this figured out. We’ve seen the Golden State Killer caught through genetic genealogy. Why not the Zodiac?
The problem is the quality of the samples. The Zodiac was careful, or maybe just lucky. The saliva on the stamps is degraded. There’s a high risk of contamination because, back in the day, detectives didn't wear gloves and masks like they do now. Everyone was touching everything. If the DNA is a mixture of three different postal workers and a random cop, you can't build a profile. It’s a technological wall we haven't quite scaled.
🔗 Read more: Jersey City Shooting Today: What Really Happened on the Ground
The Case of Lawrence Kane
Lawrence Kane is a suspect who often gets overlooked by the general public but stays high on the list for some researchers. He was a veteran who had a brain injury from a car accident, which some speculate might have lowered his impulse control.
More importantly, Harvey Hines, a retired detective, was convinced Kane was the guy. Kane worked at the same hotel as Donna Lass, a nurse who went missing and is often considered a "possible" Zodiac victim. Kathleen Johns, who famously escaped a man in 1970 who she believed was the Zodiac, identified Kane from a photo lineup.
Yet, like all the others, the physical link is missing. It’s a pattern. You find a guy with the right age, the right location, and maybe a creepy personality, but the forensic bridge between him and the crime scene just isn't there.
Jack Tarrance and the Family Secrets
We have to talk about the "family" suspects. Every few years, someone comes forward claiming their late father was the Zodiac. Jack Tarrance is a prime example. His son, Dennis Land, found a hood and some film that he believed proved his father's guilt.
Usually, these claims fall apart under scrutiny. It’s easy to look back at a cruel or eccentric parent and see a serial killer, especially when the case is this famous. While Tarrance had some strange items in his possession, nothing definitively linked him to the 1969 murders. It’s a reminder that the Zodiac has become a Rorschach test for our own fears and family traumas.
The Problem with the Sketch
We all rely on that one sketch from the Stine murder. The glasses, the crew cut, the heavy jaw. But remember: that sketch was based on a sighting from a distance, at night, under extreme stress. If the Zodiac wore a disguise or if the witnesses were off by just a little bit, we’ve been looking for the wrong man for fifty years.
💡 You might also like: Jeff Pike Bandidos MC: What Really Happened to the Texas Biker Boss
Richard Gaikowski and the "Good Times"
Richard Gaikowski is a favorite for those who follow the work of Tom Voigt at ZodiacKiller.com. Gaikowski was a journalist for an anti-establishment newspaper called Good Times.
The evidence here is weirdly specific.
- A police dispatcher named Nancy Slover, who took a call from the Zodiac, said Gaikowski’s voice was a match.
- The Zodiac letters stopped when Gaikowski went to Europe.
- His name (or a version of it) appeared to be coded into one of the Zodiac’s ciphers.
But "Gaik" was never arrested. He was never charged. He died in 2004, taking whatever secrets he had to the grave. He represents the "intellectual" suspect—the one who was smart enough to play games with the media because he was part of the media.
What to do if you’re obsessed with the case
If you're looking into suspects of the Zodiac Killer, you have to be careful not to fall down a rabbit hole of confirmation bias. It is easy to pick a name and then twist every fact to fit that person. That's what happened to many amateur sleuths over the years.
Instead, focus on the primary sources. Look at the police reports from Vallejo, Napa, and San Francisco. Read the actual transcripts of the letters. The real Zodiac wasn't a super-villain; he was a cowardly man who attacked couples in the dark and shot a cab driver from behind.
Practical Steps for Real Research
- Check the Primary Sources: Don't just trust documentaries. Go to archives like the FBI Vault or specialized sites that host the actual police files.
- Understand the Geography: If you're ever in the Bay Area, look at the distances between the hit sites. The timeline of the phone calls the Zodiac made is tight. He knew those roads like the back of his hand.
- Follow the Science: Keep an eye on the news regarding "Touch DNA" and "Genetic Genealogy." If this case is ever solved, it will be in a lab, not on a message board.
- Stay Skeptical: If someone claims they found a "confession" in a trunk, they probably didn't. Most of these "discoveries" are attempts to sell books or get a Netflix deal.
The Zodiac might have been Arthur Leigh Allen. He might have been a man we’ve never even heard of. He might have been two people working together, though most experts doubt that. What we do know is that the case remains open. The SFPD still considers it an active investigation, even if the files are mostly gathering dust.
We are waiting for that one piece of biological material that survived the decades. Until then, the suspects of the Zodiac Killer are just ghosts in a machine of our own making, reflections of a time when the world felt a lot less safe and a lot more mysterious.
Keep your eyes on the forensic updates from the Vallejo Police Department. They’ve been the most active in trying to extract new DNA profiles in recent years. If a match is made, it will likely come from their evidence lockers.