It is a bit of a running joke at this point. You’ve heard it, I’ve heard it, and every developer who has ever sat down in a pitch meeting at Warner Bros. has definitely heard it. "How do you make a game about a guy who can’t be hurt?" That is the fundamental wall everyone hits when discussing Superman in video games. We’ve had decades of attempts, ranging from the absolute bottom-of-the-barrel disasters to "okay-ish" open worlds, but we still haven’t had that "Arkham Moment." You know the one—where the character and the mechanics click so perfectly that you can't imagine them any other way.
Honestly, the history of Clark Kent’s digital outings is mostly a graveyard of good intentions and bad flight controls. We have to talk about the elephant in the room first: the 1999 Nintendo 64 title simply titled Superman. Most people call it Superman 64, and it is widely considered one of the worst games ever made. Titus Interactive, the developer, reportedly struggled with massive interference from DC and Warner Bros. The "Kryptonite fog" that obscured the entire city? That wasn't an artistic choice. It was a technical necessity because the N64 couldn't render a city while Superman was flying through it.
The gameplay consisted mostly of flying through rings. Rings. In a world where you should be punching intergalactic despots, you were playing a high-speed version of a vision test. It’s legendary for its badness, but it set a weirdly negative precedent for the character that the industry still hasn't quite shaken.
The Power Creep Problem and the Health Bar Dilemma
How do you give a god a health bar? That’s the core design flaw. If you make Superman vulnerable to standard street thugs with lead pipes, fans get annoyed because it breaks the "fantasy" of being the Last Son of Krypton. If you make him invincible, there’s no tension.
The 2006 tie-in game Superman Returns, developed by EA Tiburon, actually had a pretty clever solution to this. They didn't give Superman a health bar. Instead, Metropolis had a health bar. You were essentially invincible, but if you let the city take too much damage from giant robots or debris, you lost. It shifted the focus from self-preservation to protection. It felt right, conceptually. But the execution was a bit clunky. The city felt empty, and the missions became repetitive very quickly.
You spend half your time flying at Mach 5—which, credit where it’s due, EA nailed the feeling of breaking the sound barrier—and the other half fighting the same three types of robots. It lacked soul.
💡 You might also like: Hogwarts Legacy PS5: Why the Magic Still Holds Up in 2026
The Injustice Exception
If we look at where Superman has actually succeeded recently, it’s not in his own games. It’s in Injustice: Gods Among Us and its sequel. NetherRealm Studios solved the power problem by simply saying, "Everyone takes a super-pill that makes them as strong as Kryptonians." It’s a bit of a narrative hand-wave, but it works for a fighting game.
What’s interesting here is that Injustice leaned into the "Evil Superman" trope. It’s a bit overplayed now, but at the time, seeing a brutal, dictatorial Clark Kent was a fresh take for the medium. It gave the character stakes, even if those stakes were mostly about him punching Batman through a satellite. But a fighting game isn't a "Superman game" in the way fans want. We want the sprawling city, the rescue missions, and the feeling of being a hero, not just a brawler.
Why the Arkham Formula Failed to Translate
When Batman: Arkham Asylum dropped in 2009, everyone thought Superman would be next. Rocksteady had figured out the "superhero simulator" secret sauce. But Batman is easy to design for. He lives in a small, contained space. He fights humans. He uses gadgets.
Superman operates on a planetary scale.
If you're playing as Superman, and you hear a crime happening three miles away, you should be there in three seconds. That destroys the traditional "open world" pacing. If the map is too small, you feel cramped. If it’s too big, it feels empty. Superman: Shadow of Apokolips on the PS2 tried to bridge this gap with a more "animated series" feel. It was actually decent! It used cel-shaded graphics and featured the voice cast from the show. It felt like a labor of love, but it still felt like a series of small arenas rather than a living world.
📖 Related: Little Big Planet Still Feels Like a Fever Dream 18 Years Later
The Suicide Squad Controversy
Fast forward to 2024’s Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. We finally got a high-budget, modern look at Superman in a massive city, developed by Rocksteady themselves. But there was a catch. You didn’t play as him. You had to kill him.
The game’s portrayal of Superman was controversial. He’s brainwashed by Brainiac, cold, and murderous. While the boss fight looked visually spectacular, it left a sour taste in the mouths of many fans who have been waiting two decades for a standalone Superman game. It felt like a tease. We saw what a modern, high-fidelity Metropolis looks like, and we saw how powerful Superman could look with modern particle effects and physics. Yet, we were stuck on the ground shooting him with guns. It highlighted the massive gap in the market.
People don't just want to fight Superman; they want to be Superman.
Modern Technical Barriers: Destruction and Speed
If you’re Superman, you shouldn't be stopped by a brick wall. If a villain throws you through a building, that building should crumble. Up until the current generation of hardware (PS5, Xbox Series X, and high-end PCs), we just didn't have the processing power to handle that level of persistent environmental destruction.
We’re getting closer. Look at games like Teardown or the destruction physics in The Finals. We are finally at a point where a developer could theoretically build a Metropolis that reacts to a Kryptonian-level fight. Imagine a boss battle with Zod where you’re literally leveling city blocks. That’s the dream.
👉 See also: Why the 20 Questions Card Game Still Wins in a World of Screens
But then there’s the speed. Flying through a city at 2,000 miles per hour requires the game to load assets faster than most hard drives can handle. This is why the SSDs in modern consoles are such a big deal for Superman in video games. We might finally be at a point where the tech can keep up with the character’s flight speed without needing "Kryptonite fog" to hide the pop-in.
The Indie Scene and the "Superman Clone"
Because the big studios have been too scared to touch a solo Superman project, indie developers have stepped in. There’s a project often cited by fans called the "Superman UE5 Tech Demo." It’s basically a flight simulator using the Matrix Awakens city assets. It’s not a full game, but it’s a proof of concept. It shows that flying through a photorealistic city feels incredible.
Then there’s Undefeated, a free indie game on Steam. It’s basically a Superman game without the license. You fly around, stop crimes, and put out fires. It’s simple, but it proves that the "invincible hero" loop can actually be fun if the focus is on speed and efficiency rather than just surviving a gunfight.
What a Successful Superman Game Actually Needs
If someone were to sit down today and build the "perfect" Superman game, they’d need to stop trying to make it a standard action-adventure game. It needs to be a "Global Crisis Simulator."
- Focus on Heroism, Not Health: Give the player a reason to care about the people. Make the "health bar" the public's trust or the city's infrastructure.
- Dynamic World Events: You shouldn't just be following a waypoint. You should hear a car crash three blocks away and have to decide if you're going to stop it or stay on your current mission.
- Scaleable Power: Maybe start the game with Superman at a lower power level—perhaps he’s just starting out, like in American Alien or Birthright—and as the game progresses, the threats scale from street gangs to cosmic horrors.
- The Clark Kent Aspect: This is the most underrated part. A great Superman game needs the "Clark" moments. Investigative journalism, talking to people, being the "Man" part of the Man of Steel. Without that, he’s just a flying tank.
There are rumors, as there always are. Rumors of Monolith (the Shadow of Mordor team) or even a rebranded Rocksteady project. But for now, we’re left with a collection of cameos and "what-ifs."
The reality is that Superman in video games remains the industry’s greatest challenge. It’s not just about the tech; it’s about the philosophy of play. We’ve mastered the art of making the player feel vulnerable and making them grow strong. We haven't yet mastered making the player feel like a god who has to be careful not to break the world they’re trying to save.
Actionable Insights for Fans and Aspiring Creators
- Play the Classics (and the Flops): To understand the design challenges, play Superman: Shadow of Apokolips (PS2/GameCube) to see how the animated style worked, and watch a playthrough of Superman 64 to see exactly what to avoid in terms of movement and mission design.
- Keep an Eye on the "Wonder Woman" Game: Monolith is currently developing a Wonder Woman game. Since she shares many of Superman’s powers (flight, super strength, invulnerability), the success or failure of this title will likely determine if a Superman game is greenlit in the next five years.
- Support Indie Efforts: Games like Undefeated are the testing grounds for these mechanics. Supporting these developers shows big publishers that there is a massive appetite for high-speed, heroic flight gameplay.
- Focus on Narrative Mods: If you're on PC, look into the Grand Theft Auto V Superman mods. They are surprisingly sophisticated and offer a glimpse of what an open-world Superman experience feels like when the "invincibility" factor is dialed to eleven.
The "Curse of Superman" in gaming is really just a lack of imagination. The tech is finally here. Now we just need a studio brave enough to let us fly.