Super Bowl Winner of 2017: Why We Still Can’t Stop Talking About the Patriots’ Comeback

Super Bowl Winner of 2017: Why We Still Can’t Stop Talking About the Patriots’ Comeback

Honestly, if you turned off the TV halfway through the third quarter on February 5, 2017, nobody would have blamed you. It looked over. The Atlanta Falcons weren't just winning; they were embarrassing the New England Patriots. Dan Quinn’s defense was flying around like they had thirteen guys on the field, and Matt Ryan was slicing through the secondary with surgical precision. By the time Tevin Coleman caught a 6-yard touchdown pass to make it 28–3, the win probability for Atlanta was hovering somewhere around 99.8%.

That’s what makes the super bowl winner of 2017 such a legendary piece of sports history. It wasn't just a win. It was a glitch in the matrix.

The New England Patriots ended up winning 34–28 in the first overtime game in Super Bowl history. To this day, "28–3" is a meme that haunts the city of Atlanta and serves as a shorthand for the most improbable collapse—and the most cold-blooded comeback—the NFL has ever seen. You’ve got to realize how much was on the line for Tom Brady and Bill Belichick that night at NRG Stadium in Houston. Brady was 39. People were starting to whisper about the "cliff." If they lost this one, they’d be 4–3 in Super Bowls together. Still great, but not invincible. Instead, they became the first team to ever erase a deficit larger than 10 points in a Super Bowl. They tripled that.

The Anatomy of a 28–3 Disaster

The first half was a total nightmare for New England. Julian Edelman was getting smothered. LeGarrette Blount fumbled. Then, the backbreaker: Robert Alford intercepted Brady and took it 82 yards for a touchdown. You could see it on Brady’s face as he tried to tackle Alford and missed—he looked old. He looked done.

But here’s the thing about that Falcons team. They were built for speed, not necessarily for a four-hour street fight. As the game wore on, that speed started to look like fatigue. Atlanta’s defense stayed on the field for an ungodly 93 plays. For context, most NFL defenses start to gas out around 65 or 70.

New England’s strategy was basically to paper-cut them to death. Short passes to James White. Quick slants to Danny Amendola. They weren't looking for the home run; they were just trying to keep the clock moving and keep the Falcons' offense on the sideline. James White, by the way, was arguably the unsung hero. Everyone talks about Brady, but White finished with 14 catches, 110 yards, and three touchdowns. He was the engine that kept the chains moving when the deep ball wasn't there.

✨ Don't miss: The Division 2 National Championship Game: How Ferris State Just Redrew the Record Books

Why the Falcons Actually Lost (It Wasn't Just Brady)

People love to credit the super bowl winner of 2017 solely to "Brady Magic," but that’s a bit of a lazy narrative. If we’re being real, Kyle Shanahan’s play-calling played a massive role in Atlanta’s demise.

With about four minutes left in the game, the Falcons had the ball at the Patriots' 22-yard line. They were already in field goal range. A simple kick would have made it a two-score game and effectively ended it. Instead of running the ball to burn the clock and setup the kick, they dropped back to pass. Matt Ryan got sacked by Trey Flowers for a 12-yard loss. Then a holding penalty pushed them back even further. They ended up punting.

It was a catastrophic failure of game management. You’ve got a kicker like Matt Bryant who was money all year, and you don’t give him the chance to put it away? It’s the kind of decision-making that keeps coaches up at night for decades.

The Catch That Defied Physics

We also have to talk about the Julian Edelman catch. If David Tyree’s "Helmet Catch" was the most miraculous play of the 2000s, Edelman’s catch in 2017 is the 2010s equivalent. The ball was tipped into the air by Alford, fell into a pile of three Falcons defenders, and somehow, Edelman trapped it against a defender’s shoe inches off the turf.

I remember watching the replay in slow motion and thinking there was no way his fingers were under that ball. But they were. It gave the Patriots the momentum they needed to tie the game at 28 and send it into the abyss of overtime.

🔗 Read more: Por qué los partidos de Primera B de Chile son más entretenidos que la división de honor

What This Game Did to the NFL Legacy

The 2017 Super Bowl (Super Bowl LI) changed how we rank quarterbacks forever. Before this game, the "Greatest of All Time" debate between Joe Montana and Tom Brady was still a spicy topic of conversation on sports radio. Montana was 4–0. Brady was 4–2.

After Brady led four consecutive scoring drives to win his fifth ring, the debate basically died. He took home the MVP trophy, and rightfully so, after throwing for a then-record 466 yards. He showed a level of psychological resilience that most athletes simply don't possess. While the Falcons were celebrating on the sidelines in the third quarter, Brady was reportedly telling his teammates, "It’s going to be a hell of a story."

That’s a psycho-level of confidence.

Beyond the Scoreboard: The Financial and Cultural Impact

This game was a monster for Fox. It drew 111.3 million viewers. Advertisers paid $5 million for 30-second spots, which seems like a bargain compared to today’s prices, but at the time, it was a staggering investment.

Lady Gaga’s halftime show also set a high bar, starting with her jumping off the roof of the stadium (or appearing to via pre-recorded magic) and performing a medley that was actually quite heavy on the hits without getting too bogged down in political messaging, which was a concern at the time. It was pure entertainment, which matched the chaotic energy of the game itself.

💡 You might also like: South Carolina women's basketball schedule: What Most People Get Wrong

How to Apply the 2017 Patriots Mindset

The reason we still study the super bowl winner of 2017 isn't just because we love football. It's because it serves as a masterclass in crisis management and incremental progress.

If you’re facing a "28–3" situation in your career or business, you can’t look at the final score. You have to look at the next play. The Patriots didn't try to score 25 points in one drive. They took the two-point conversions when they had to. They trusted their conditioning.

Actionable Takeaways from Super Bowl LI

  • Ignore the "Win Probability": Statistics are historical, not predictive of the human will. If the Patriots had looked at the Jumbotron and seen their 0.2% chance of winning, they would have checked out. Focus on the execution, not the odds.
  • Conditioning Wins Late: The Falcons’ defense was gassed because they weren't prepared for a high-volume play count. In any competitive field, the person who can maintain their "Form" the longest usually wins when things get messy.
  • Aggression vs. Discipline: Kyle Shanahan was aggressive when he should have been disciplined. Knowing when to take the "field goal" (the safe win) is just as important as knowing when to go for the throat.
  • The Power of One Stop: Dont'a Hightower’s strip-sack on Matt Ryan was the actual turning point. Sometimes you don't need a total overhaul; you just need one big play to shift the energy of an entire organization.

The 2017 season concluded with a reminder that no lead is safe and no deficit is insurmountable. For the Patriots, it was the peak of their dynasty. For the Falcons, it was a "what if" that may never be answered. If you're looking to dive deeper into the play-by-play, the NFL’s official YouTube channel has the full "Sound FX" version of the game, which captures the sideline chatter—it’s the best way to hear exactly how the momentum shifted in real-time.

Study the fourth quarter. Look at the body language of the Falcons' offensive line compared to the Patriots' defensive front. You'll see exactly when the game was won, and it happened long before the final touchdown in overtime.