Walk through the center of Dubai, New York, or Paris, and you'll see them. Those sleek, glass-and-steel boxes that seem to defy gravity while simultaneously looking like they could belong absolutely anywhere. This isn't an accident. It’s the result of a radical movement called the style international en architecture. It changed everything. Before this, buildings were "heavy." They had stone carvings, gargoyles, and thick walls that shouted about which country they were in. Then, the 1920s happened. Architects got tired of the old ways. They wanted a "machine for living."
Honestly, the name itself is a bit of a giveaway. It wasn't meant to be French or German or American. It was meant to be universal. But here’s the kicker: many people think the style international en architecture is just "boring modernism." It's actually a lot more technical and, frankly, a bit more rebellious than that.
📖 Related: Why Church of the Little Flower Coral Gables Stays So Iconic
The Night the Rules Changed
In 1932, two guys named Philip Johnson and Henry-Russell Hitchcock curated an exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA). They basically told the world that traditional architecture was dead. They looked at what was happening in Europe—mostly at the Bauhaus—and decided this was the future. They stripped away the "soul" of local culture to find something more functional.
The style international en architecture isn't just about looks. It’s about three big rules. First, volume over mass. Think of a building as a balloon of space, not a heavy pile of bricks. Second, regularity. No more messy, asymmetrical designs unless there’s a functional reason for it. Third, and this is the one that usually upsets people, no decoration. None. No crown molding. No statues. Just the raw beauty of the materials.
It’s kind of wild when you think about it. For thousands of years, humans decorated their homes. Suddenly, these architects decided that "ornament is crime," a phrase coined by Adolf Loos that basically became the movement's unofficial slogan.
The Big Three: Gropius, Corbusier, and Mies
If you want to understand how we got here, you have to look at the people behind the drafting tables.
Le Corbusier is the name most people know. He was obsessed with the idea that a house should be as efficient as a car. He came up with the "Five Points of Architecture." These included pilotis (those skinny stilts that lift buildings off the ground), roof gardens, and ribbon windows that wrap around corners. His Villa Savoye in France is the poster child for this. It looks like a UFO landed in a field. It’s white, it’s geometric, and it’s arguably the most influential house of the 20th century.
Then you have Ludwig Mies van der Rohe. He’s the "less is more" guy. He wanted buildings to be "skin and bones." Glass and steel. His Seagram Building in New York is the ultimate example of the style international en architecture. It’s a bronze-colored tower that looks incredibly expensive because, well, it was. He didn't just build a skyscraper; he built a monument to precision.
Finally, Walter Gropius. He founded the Bauhaus school. He was all about the bridge between art and industry. He wanted things to be mass-producible.
Why This Style Still Matters (and Why It’s Hated)
Why are we still talking about this nearly a century later? Because it’s everywhere. Every glass office building you see is a descendant of the style international en architecture. It was the first truly global style. Because it didn't use local materials or local history, you could drop a "Le Corbusier" building in the middle of Tokyo or Chicago, and it would look the same.
That’s also why people hate it. It’s "placeless."
Critics like Jane Jacobs argued that these buildings killed city life. They were too cold. Too sterile. They didn't have the "messy vitality" of older neighborhoods. If you've ever walked past a giant glass wall that feels like it’s ignoring you, you’ve felt the downside of this movement. It prioritized the idea of the building over the humans using it.
Technical Prowess: Steel and Glass
Let’s get nerdy for a second. The style international en architecture only happened because of engineering. Before this, walls held up the roof. If you wanted a big window, the wall would get weak and the building would fall down.
👉 See also: Why Sour Cream Bacon Potato Salad Is Actually Better Than The Mayo Version
Then came the steel frame.
Suddenly, the walls didn't have to carry any weight. They became "curtain walls." You could literally wrap a building in a thin sheet of glass because the steel skeleton inside was doing all the heavy lifting. This allowed for those massive, sun-drenched interiors that we take for granted today. It changed the way light works inside a room. Instead of small holes in the wall, you had entire walls of light.
Misconceptions About the International Style
One of the biggest myths is that this style was "cheap." People see a flat roof and a plain wall and think it was a budget choice. Actually, the early masterpieces of the style international en architecture were incredibly expensive. Achieving those perfectly smooth surfaces and those massive spans of glass required insane levels of craftsmanship.
Another misconception? That it’s just one thing. While the MoMA guys tried to put it in a box, there were huge variations. Some architects, like Alvar Aalto, tried to make it "warmer" by using wood and organic shapes. But the "glass box" version is what won the popularity contest because it was easy for corporations to replicate.
The Legacy of the Style International en Architecture
Today, we are in a "Post-Modern" or even "Neo-Modern" era, but the DNA of the 1930s is still there. We’ve brought back some color and some weird shapes, but the core principles—functionalism, industrial materials, and the rejection of unnecessary clutter—remain the baseline for modern construction.
When you look at a skyscraper today, you aren't just looking at glass. You’re looking at a 100-year-old dream of a world where technology and design are the same thing. It was a bold, arrogant, and beautiful attempt to reset the clock of human history.
Actionable Takeaways for Design Enthusiasts
If you're looking to apply the logic of the style international en architecture to your own life or space, here is how you do it without making your home feel like a hospital:
- Focus on Volume: Instead of filling a room with furniture, focus on the "empty" space. Let the room breathe.
- Honesty in Materials: If something is made of wood, let it look like wood. Don't paint over the texture of concrete or steel. The movement was big on "truth to materials."
- Remove the Superfluous: Look at your space. If an object doesn't have a function or a very strong aesthetic purpose, get rid of it.
- Prioritize Light: Use sheer curtains or no curtains at all. The goal is to blur the line between the inside and the outside, just like Le Corbusier intended.
- Study the Giants: Visit a local building that uses a curtain wall or stilts. See how it feels to stand under it. Experience the "weightlessness" for yourself.
The style international en architecture wasn't just a trend. It was a pivot point. Whether you love the minimalist aesthetic or miss the gargoyles of the past, you can't deny that it shaped the world we live in. It taught us that "less" could indeed be "more," provided you have the courage to leave the walls bare.