You’ve seen them. The glossy, over-saturated photos of a "diverse" office where everyone is laughing at a salad or pointing intensely at a blank laptop screen. For years, the hunt for stock images of black people felt like a repetitive loop of stereotypes. You either got the "corporate achiever" in a stiff suit or the "urban" trope that felt stuck in a 90s music video. It was frustrating. Honestly, it was exhausting for creators who just wanted to reflect reality without making it a "statement."
Things are changing, though.
But not fast enough for everyone.
If you're a designer or a small business owner, you know the struggle of scrolling through pages of search results only to find the same five models. It’s a supply chain issue, basically. For a long time, major agencies didn't prioritize Black photographers or Black subjects unless it fit a specific marketing "niche." We’re talking about a systemic gap in the visual archives of the internet. When you search for something as simple as "family dinner," the algorithm shouldn't default to a single demographic, yet for a decade, it did.
What’s actually wrong with traditional stock images of black people?
The problem isn't just a lack of photos; it’s the lack of nuance. Historically, stock photography has been a game of averages. Photographers shot what they thought would sell to the widest possible audience, which usually meant centering whiteness. When Black subjects were included, they were often treated as an afterthought or a checkbox for "diversity."
Joshua Kissi, a heavy hitter in the creative world and co-founder of TONL, has talked extensively about this. He noted that many images lacked cultural soul. You’d see a photo of a Black woman, but her hair wasn't styled right, or the lighting was abysmal because the photographer didn't know how to expose for darker skin tones. That’s a technical failure, not just a social one. If the lighting is flat, the person looks gray. If the shadows aren't managed, features disappear. It’s basic physics, but it was ignored for a long time.
Also, the settings were weirdly limited. You’d find plenty of "professional" shots, but where were the photos of Black people hiking? Or doing yoga? Or just sitting on a porch? The "everyday-ness" was missing. This created a narrow visual language that told the world Black life only happened in very specific, sanctioned boxes.
💡 You might also like: Different Kinds of Dreads: What Your Stylist Probably Won't Tell You
The rise of the "Authentic" movement
Everything shifted around 2020. Well, it started earlier, but that’s when the big players finally felt the floor shaking. Companies started realizing that Gen Z and Millennials can smell a "token" photo from a mile away. You can’t just slap a photo of a Black person on your homepage and call it inclusion if the photo looks like it was staged in a vacuum.
Newer platforms stepped up to fill the void. Sites like Pexels and Unsplash started actively recruiting creators of color. But the real game-changers were the niche libraries.
- TONL: They focused on narrative. Their photos actually tell a story, showing people in real-life scenarios—like a grandmother teaching a child to cook or friends at a protest.
- Nappy.co: This one was a breath of fresh air. It’s a high-res, free photo site specifically dedicated to Black and Brown people. It’s simple, it’s effective, and it’s beautiful.
- CreateHER Stock: A massive resource specifically for images of Black women.
These sites didn't just add more stock images of black people to the mix; they changed the vibe. They brought in natural hair textures, various shades of melanin, and actual cultural markers that make a photo feel lived-in.
Technical hurdles: It’s all in the lighting
Let’s get nerdy for a second. Lighting darker skin requires a different approach than lighting lighter skin. Standard digital camera sensors were actually calibrated—historically—using something called "Shirley Cards." These were reference cards used by lab technicians to calibrate skin tones in the mid-20th century, and the model, Shirley, was white. This bias baked itself into the technology of film and, eventually, digital processing.
When a photographer who isn't trained in diverse lighting shoots a Black model, they often overcompensate. They blast them with too much light, which creates "hot spots" on the forehead and cheeks, or they underexpose them into a silhouette.
Modern experts like Adrienne Raquel or Prince Gyasi have shown the world what's possible when you understand color theory in relation to melanin. They use warm reflectors, specific gel filters, and soft boxes to bring out the richness of the skin. This level of craft is what separates a "cheap" stock photo from a high-quality editorial image. When you're looking for images for your brand, you need to look for that depth. If the skin looks ashy, skip it.
📖 Related: Desi Bazar Desi Kitchen: Why Your Local Grocer is Actually the Best Place to Eat
The ROI of representation (Yes, it’s about money too)
Let’s be real: businesses aren't just doing this to be nice. It’s good business. Data from various marketing studies, including reports from Adobe, suggests that consumers are more likely to trust a brand that reflects their reality.
If a Black consumer sees a brand using generic, poorly lit stock images of black people, they feel the disconnect. It feels performative. On the flip side, using imagery that feels authentic builds immediate rapport. It says, "We see you, and we actually put effort into representing you correctly."
There's a huge difference between "inclusion" and "belonging." Inclusion is inviting someone to the party; belonging is playing their favorite song. In the world of stock photography, belonging looks like a photo where the person looks like they actually belong in the setting, not like they were photoshopped in to meet a quota.
Where to find the good stuff right now
Stop using the first page of results on the "Big Three" stock sites. Seriously. Everyone uses those, and your project will end up looking like a generic bank brochure.
- Check out Broadly’s "The Gender Spectrum Collection": While it’s focused on trans and non-binary people, it contains some of the most authentic, non-cliché images of Black folks you’ll find anywhere.
- The "Black Illustrations" project: Sometimes you don’t need a photo; you need a vector. This site is a goldmine for tech-focused illustrations that actually feature Black people.
- Pocstock: They have a huge global reach. If you need images of Black people in Africa, the Caribbean, or Europe—not just the US—this is your spot.
- Getty Images’ "763 Project": Getty actually partnered with organizations like Dove to create more realistic depictions of women and people of color. It’s a massive improvement over their legacy stuff.
AI and the new frontier (and why it's kind of a mess)
We can't talk about stock images of black people in 2026 without mentioning AI. Midjourney, DALL-E, and others have made it possible to "generate" any image you want.
It’s tempting. It’s cheap. It’s fast.
👉 See also: Deg f to deg c: Why We’re Still Doing Mental Math in 2026
But it has a massive "bias" problem. Because AI is trained on existing data (which, as we discussed, is biased), it often hallucinates stereotypes. Early AI models struggled to render Black features accurately, often defaulting to Eurocentric features with darker skin or creating weirdly hyper-sexualized or aggressive "warrior" archetypes.
If you use AI for your imagery, you have to be incredibly careful with your prompting. You can’t just say "Black person in an office." You have to specify lighting, hair texture, and context to avoid the "uncanny valley" of digital stereotypes. Honestly, using a real photo from a Black photographer is still the superior choice if you want soul.
How to choose the right image for your project
Don't just look for "a Black person." Look for the story.
Is the person's expression genuine? Does the environment look like somewhere a real person would actually be? Look at the hair. Is it a style that makes sense for the context? If you’re showing a "relatable" home scene but the model has perfect, immovable "pageant hair," it’s going to feel fake.
Look for candidness. The best stock images of black people are the ones that don't feel like stock images at all. They feel like a frame from a movie or a snap from a friend’s Instagram.
Actionable steps for your next project
- Diversify your sources: Bookmark at least three of the niche sites mentioned above. Don't rely on one giant library.
- Search with intent: Use specific keywords like "natural hair," "locs," "dark skin," or "Black joy" to bypass the generic corporate results.
- Check the license: Some niche sites require attribution. Don't be that person who steals work from independent creators.
- Audit your own content: Look at your last ten social media posts or your website’s landing pages. If the representation feels forced or thin, it’s time to swap those assets out for something with more depth.
- Support Black photographers: When you have the budget, hire a photographer. If you don't, buy from libraries that explicitly state they pay their contributors a fair wage.
The visual landscape of the internet is finally starting to catch up to the reality of the world. It’s not about being "woke"—it’s about being accurate. When you use high-quality, authentic stock images of black people, you’re making your work better, more relatable, and frankly, more beautiful. Stop settling for the "salad-laughing" clichés and go find something that actually looks like real life.