Stephen Hawking didn't believe in God. At least, not the kind of God who listens to prayers or cares if you lied on your taxes. If you spent the last few decades following his career, you probably noticed his stance on the divine shifted from "tantalizingly open" to "completely closed." Honestly, it’s one of the most misunderstood arcs in modern science.
He was a man who spent his life trapped in a chair, yet his mind wandered through eleven dimensions and the crushing gravity of black holes. For a long time, people clung to the final sentence of his 1988 masterpiece, A Brief History of Time. You know the one. He wrote that if we found a complete theory of the universe, we would truly "know the mind of God."
Religious groups loved that. They saw it as an olive branch. They thought the world's smartest man was leaving the door cracked open for a Creator.
He wasn't.
The Evolution of Stephen Hawking and God
By the time he published The Grand Design in 2010, Hawking had stopped using metaphors. He basically walked up to the door and slammed it shut. He argued that because laws like gravity exist, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. "Spontaneous creation," he called it. He famously said it wasn't necessary to invoke God to "light the blue touch paper" and get the whole thing started.
It was a blunt shift.
Why the change? Or was it a change at all? If you look closely, Hawking was always a "Spinozian" at heart, much like Albert Einstein. He used the word "God" as a shorthand for the laws of physics. To Hawking, the universe was a giant, self-winding clock that didn't need a clockmaker to exist.
👉 See also: Why Taylor Swift People Mag Covers Actually Define Her Career Eras
Why Time is the Ultimate "God-Killer"
Hawking had a very specific, almost annoying, logical argument against a Creator. It’s all about time.
Think about it this way:
- Science shows the universe began at the Big Bang.
- Time itself began at the Big Bang.
- Therefore, there was no "time" before the Big Bang for a God to exist in.
He compared asking "What did God do before he created the universe?" to asking for directions to the edge of the Earth. You can’t go North of the North Pole. It’s not that it’s a secret; it’s that the concept doesn't exist. If there is no time, there is no time for a cause. If there is no cause, you don't need a Causer.
Basically, he felt the role of a Creator was redundant.
The Personal Side of the Debate
It wasn't just about math and physics. Hawking’s personal life was a tug-of-war between faith and logic. His first wife, Jane Hawking, was a devout Christian. She’s gone on record saying that her faith was the only thing that got her through the grueling years of caring for Stephen as his ALS progressed.
Imagine that dinner table.
✨ Don't miss: Does Emmanuel Macron Have Children? The Real Story of the French President’s Family Life
On one side, you have a woman who believes a merciful God is giving her the strength to survive. On the other, you have a man who believes his motor neurone disease is just a "random cosmic accident" and that the brain is just a computer that stops working when the parts fail.
Jane once said that Stephen’s atheism became "almost a religion" in its own right—a dogmatic insistence that nothing exists beyond what we can measure. She felt his fame turned him into a sort of "oracle" for atheism, a role he eventually embraced with a grin.
The "No-Boundary" Proposal
One of his most complex ideas was the "no-boundary" proposal, which he worked on with James Hartle. It’s dense stuff. But in plain English? It suggests that the universe is finite but has no edges.
If the universe has no beginning and no end, where does a Creator fit in?
If the universe is completely self-contained, it doesn't need to be "brought into being." It just is. This was his way of removing the "God of the Gaps." Usually, when science can't explain something—like the very first second of existence—people put God in that gap. Hawking spent his career trying to close those gaps until there was no room left for a divine finger to move the pieces.
What He Said Right Before He Died
In his final book, Brief Answers to the Big Questions, published posthumously, he was the most explicit he’d ever been. He wrote: "There is no God. No one directs the universe."
🔗 Read more: Judge Dana and Keith Cutler: What Most People Get Wrong About TV’s Favorite Legal Couple
He didn't say it with malice. He actually seemed quite peaceful about it. He viewed the belief in an afterlife as a "fairy story for people afraid of the dark." For Hawking, the "miracle" wasn't that a deity made us; it was that we, as tiny collections of stardust, were able to understand the laws that govern the stars.
He was grateful. Not to a person, but to the universe itself for being understandable.
The Limits of Hawking's Argument
Even if you’re a die-hard Hawking fan, you have to admit there are holes in the "no God" logic. Critics, including many of his fellow scientists, point out that even if gravity explains how the universe started, it doesn't explain why gravity exists in the first place.
Why is there something rather than nothing?
Why do the laws of physics follow mathematical rules?
Hawking’s answer was often "M-theory" or the "Multiverse." He argued that there are an infinite number of universes, and we just happen to live in the one where the laws allow for life. But to a philosopher, that sounds a lot like faith—just with different vocabulary.
Actionable Takeaways for the Curious
If you’re trying to reconcile Stephen Hawking and God in your own head, don't feel like you have to pick a side tonight. Here is how to actually engage with his ideas without getting a headache:
- Read The Grand Design first: It’s much shorter and more direct than A Brief History of Time. It lays out his "Model-Dependent Realism" which is the core of his worldview.
- Differentiate between the "Personal God" and the "Scientific God": Most people argue about a God who answers prayers. Hawking was arguing about a God who serves as a "First Cause." You can believe in one and agree with him on the other.
- Look into the "Anthropic Principle": This is the idea that the universe seems "fine-tuned" for us. Hawking’s rejection of this is the bridge between his science and his atheism.
- Watch the debate: Search for archives of the "Hawking vs. Lennox" debates (John Lennox is an Oxford mathematician and a Christian). It’s one of the few times you’ll see Hawking’s logic challenged by someone who actually speaks his mathematical language.
Ultimately, Hawking didn't prove God doesn't exist. You can't prove a negative. What he did was show that, from a mathematical standpoint, God isn't necessary to explain why we are here. For him, the beauty of the equations was enough. For others, the "why" behind the equations still points to something more.