Honestly, it’s getting a little ridiculous at this point. We’ve spent the better part of a decade watching Stephen Curry turn the basketball court into a personal video game, and yet, every time you look at the updated box scores in early 2026, the numbers still don't feel real.
As of mid-January 2026, Steph Curry 3 point total has climbed past 4,200 career makes in the regular season. Just let that sink in for a second. When he passed Ray Allen back in 2021, we thought that was the pinnacle. Instead, he just kept going. He’s currently sitting at 4,205 makes on 9,967 attempts. That is a career average of 42.2%.
It is basically impossible.
People love to talk about how the "math" of the NBA has changed, and they aren't wrong. Teams take more shots from deep than ever before. But what most fans get wrong is the idea that someone is just going to come along and "volume-shoot" their way past Steph. It’s not just about the attempts; it’s about the fact that he’s doing this while being the primary focus of every single defensive scheme for fifteen years.
The 4,000 Club and the Ghost of James Harden
There’s a reason James Harden is the only other name even remotely in the rearview mirror, and even he is nearly a thousand makes behind. Harden is currently at 3,293. That’s a massive gap. To put it in perspective, if a rookie came into the league today and made 300 three-pointers every single year—which is a top-tier, All-Star level shooting season—they would still need to play for fourteen seasons just to reach where Steph is right now.
And Steph isn't done.
He’s still out here dropping 48 points on the Blazers like he did in December 2025. He’s still averaging about 4.6 makes per game this season. The guy is 37 years old and still has a quicker release than 22-year-olds who grew up watching his YouTube highlights.
Why the "Next Steph" Might Never Happen
We see guys like Anthony Edwards or even younger prospects like Kon Knueppel putting up big numbers early. Edwards is amazing. But his career average is around 2.9 makes per game. To catch the Steph Curry 3 point record, he’d have to essentially double his efficiency and maintain it until he’s nearly forty.
💡 You might also like: Is the football match chelsea today actually worth your time?
It’s the longevity that kills the "record will be broken soon" argument. Most players' legs give out. Their shooting percentage dips as they lose that half-step of space. Curry? He’s actually shooting better from deep this year (39-42% depending on the week) than a lot of "specialists" in their prime.
The Warriors are a different team now than they were in 2016, obviously. Klay Thompson is in Dallas. The roster is younger. But the gravity Steph creates just by standing at the logo is still the most powerful force in the NBA.
What the Numbers Actually Tell Us
If you want to understand the scale of this, look at the "Three-Pointers vs. Free Throws" stat that started circulating recently. Steph has more career three-pointers made than free throws made. Think about how weird that is. For almost every other elite scorer in history—Kobe, Jordan, LeBron, Durant—the free throw line is the "easy" way to pad the stats. For Steph, the 27-footer is the high-percentage shot.
- Total Regular Season Makes: 4,205
- Career 3P%: 42.2%
- Playoff 3P Makes: 570+ (and counting)
- Seasons with 300+ Threes: 7 (No one else has more than one)
The Myth of the "Chucker"
There’s this weird narrative that Steph just "chucks" and that’s why the record is high. That is total nonsense. If he were a chucker, his percentage would be in the mid-30s. Instead, he’s maintained a 40%+ clip while taking shots that would get any other player in the history of the world benched immediately.
He changed the geometry of the game. Coaches used to yell at players for taking shots in transition. Now, if you’re open at the break, you’re expected to let it fly. That’s the "Curry Effect," but ironically, the very revolution he started is making it harder for anyone to catch him because defenses are now trained from middle school to guard the perimeter. He didn't have that "benefit." He had to invent the space himself.
Actionable Insights for Fans and Analysts
If you’re trying to track the Steph Curry 3 point trajectory or comparing him to modern shooters, keep these three things in mind:
- Watch the Volume-to-Efficiency Ratio: Don't just look at total makes. Look at how many attempts it takes. If a player hits 4,000 threes but shoots 34%, they aren't the next Steph; they’re just a high-volume outlet.
- The "300 Club": Check the end-of-season stats. If a player doesn't hit 300 triples in a season at least three or four times in their twenties, they have zero mathematical chance of catching Curry.
- Appreciate the "Old" Years: We are in the bonus round of Steph's career. Every make from here on out is just pushing the record into a territory that might stay untouched for fifty years, similar to Wilt Chamberlain’s rebounding records.
The reality is that we are watching a statistical outlier that shouldn't exist. It’s sort of like Gretzky’s points or Rice’s receiving yards. You can see the numbers on the screen, but when you try to map out how someone else could replicate them, the math just stops working.
Keep an eye on the Warriors' schedule for the rest of 2026. He’s on pace to potentially hit 4,500 by the time this contract is up. At that point, the conversation isn't about who will break the record—it’s about whether we should even bother keeping track of second place.