It’s been a while since the dust settled in Berlin, but honestly, the Spain v England final at Euro 2024 still feels like a fever dream for most fans. You remember the vibe. The tension was so thick you could basically carve it with a dull knife. Everyone was waiting for that one moment of "football coming home" magic, but instead, we got a masterclass in why modern Spanish football is just on another planet right now.
Spain won 2-1. It sounds close. On paper, it was close. But if you really watched that game at the Olympiastadion, you saw two completely different philosophies clashing, and one was clearly more evolved.
What Really Happened in the Spain v England Final
The first half was, to put it bluntly, a bit of a slog. It was cagey. Tactical. Basically a chess match where both players were terrified of moving a pawn. England’s Luke Shaw—who hadn't started a game in forever—was surprisingly solid against the wonderkid Lamine Yamal.
Then the second half started and everything broke.
Within two minutes of the restart, Yamal found some grass, slid a ball across to Nico Williams, and boom. 1-0. It was the kind of goal that makes you realize how fast the game is moving these days. Kyle Walker, usually the fastest man on the pitch, just couldn't get there in time.
The Rodri Factor and the Tactical Shift
The crazy thing is, Spain actually lost their best player at halftime. Rodri, the guy who literally glues the whole team together, went off injured. Usually, that’s when a team collapses. But Martin Zubimendi stepped in and Spain didn't even skip a beat.
England, as they always do under Gareth Southgate, found a way back from the brink. Cole Palmer came off the bench and, with basically his first meaningful touch, smashed a low drive into the corner from 22 yards. 1-1. The England fans went absolutely mental. For a second, it felt like the script was being rewritten.
📖 Related: Chivas Femenil vs Club América Femenil: Why This Rivalry Hits Different in Liga MX Femenil
But Spain just kept coming.
The winning goal from Mikel Oyarzabal in the 86th minute was a heartbreak for the Three Lions. Marc Cucurella—the man with the hair everyone was talking about—whipped in a cross, and Oyarzabal slid it home. VAR checked it. It was tight. Like, "centimeters" tight. But he was onside.
Why the Numbers Don't Lie
If you look at the stats from the Spain v England final, you see a pretty lopsided story.
Spain had about 65% of the ball. They completed nearly 500 passes compared to England’s 230-ish. When you spend that much time chasing the ball, your legs eventually turn to lead. That’s exactly what happened to the English defense in those final ten minutes.
It wasn't just the passing, though. It was the quality of the chances. Spain’s Expected Goals (xG) was nearly 2.0, while England struggled to create much beyond that Palmer screamer.
- Total Shots: Spain 16, England 9
- Shots on Target: Spain 6, England 4
- Corners: Spain 10, England 2
England had a late, late chance. A header from Declan Rice saved by Unai Simón, then Marc Guéhi’s follow-up cleared off the line by Dani Olmo. It was pure chaos. If that goes in, we’re talking about extra time and maybe penalties. But football is a game of margins, and Spain’s margins were just better.
A Lesson in Midfield Control
The big takeaway from the Spain v England final isn't just about the goals. It’s about how Spain manages the "middle" of the game. Even without Rodri for 45 minutes, Fabián Ruiz and Dani Olmo dictated where the ball went.
England has world-class talent. Jude Bellingham is a superstar. Phil Foden is a genius. But in this specific game, they felt like individuals trying to save the day rather than a cohesive machine. Spain, on the other hand, felt like a single organism moving toward the goal.
The Aftermath: What This Means for Both Teams
Spain is now the most successful team in European Championship history with four titles. They won every single game in the tournament. Seven for seven. No penalties needed, no lucky breaks. Just pure dominance.
For England, it was a second consecutive final loss. It’s a tough pill to swallow. People talk about the "curse" or the tactics, but honestly, they just ran into a better team.
Key takeaway for your next football debate:
If you want to understand why England lost, don't look at the goals. Look at the 60th to 80th minute. Spain kept the ball, made England run, and waited for the fatigue to set in. By the time Oyarzabal scored, the English midfield was gassed.
Actionable Insight for Fans and Analysts:
The next time you're watching a high-stakes final, watch the defensive transitions. England’s struggle wasn't their talent; it was their inability to win the ball back quickly once they lost it. Spain’s "counter-press" is what truly won them the trophy. If you're coaching or analyzing, start focusing on the five seconds after possession is lost—that's where championships are decided.