You’ve seen the stickers on the boxes at the store. Maybe you’ve even seen the heated threads on your feed. One side says it’s the ultimate eco-friendly kitchen hack. The other side says it’s a brand you shouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole. Honestly, the SodaStream boycott ethical issues are way more complicated than just "plastic vs. glass."
It’s a mess.
Most people think this started yesterday, but the drama has been bubbling for over a decade. It’s a mix of international law, factory relocations, and the sheer power of a celebrity endorsement gone wrong.
Why People Started Walking Away
Basically, the core of the boycott started with a factory. For years, SodaStream’s main manufacturing plant was in Mishor Adumim. That’s an industrial park inside Ma’ale Adumim, which is an Israeli settlement in the West Bank. Under international law, these settlements are considered illegal.
This isn't just about lines on a map. Activists from the BDS movement (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) argued that by operating there, SodaStream was directly benefiting from the occupation of Palestinian land. They were paying taxes to the settlement municipality, not to the Palestinian Authority.
Then came the Scarlett Johansson incident.
In 2014, the actress became the face of the brand. She was also an ambassador for Oxfam, a global charity that opposes trade from these very same settlements. The backlash was instant. Oxfam basically told her she had to choose. She chose SodaStream. She resigned from Oxfam.
The internet exploded.
The Factory Move: Problem Solved?
By 2015, SodaStream had enough of the PR nightmare. They packed up and moved the factory to the Lehavim area in the Negev (Naqab) desert. They said it was for "operational reasons."
The boycott should have ended there, right?
Nope. It actually got weirder.
When the factory moved, about 500 Palestinian workers lost their jobs because they couldn't get permits to work inside the new location. The company blamed the Israeli government. The government blamed the company. The BDS movement called it a win but kept the boycott alive.
Why? Because the new site is in the Naqab, which is land that has its own history of displacement involving Bedouin communities.
The 2026 Reality: Is it Still on the List?
Fast forward to right now, in 2026. If you check the latest BDS "Targeted Boycott" lists, SodaStream is still there. It’s not a "priority target" like some of the huge tech firms, but it’s definitely on the "organic" list.
People are still skeptical for a few reasons:
- The PepsiCo Connection: Pepsi bought SodaStream in 2018 for $3.2 billion. Now, some activists boycott the brand just because it’s part of a massive multinational that they feel doesn't align with their ethics.
- Greenwashing Claims: SodaStream markets itself as the savior of the oceans. But critics point out that the plastic syrup bottles and the carbon footprint of shipping heavy CO2 canisters across the globe aren't as "zero-waste" as the ads claim.
- Labor Disputes: There have been lingering reports about 12-hour shifts and issues with unionization at some of their newer facilities.
It’s a classic case of a company trying to "fix" its image while the target keeps moving.
The Ethical Trade-Off
Some people still buy them. They argue that the environmental benefits of skipping thousands of single-use cans and bottles outweigh the political baggage. Others say that if a company’s history is rooted in "stolen land," no amount of recycled plastic can wash that away.
✨ Don't miss: US Dollar to Nepali Rupee: What Most People Get Wrong
Is SodaStream "evil"? That’s a heavy word.
But it’s definitely a brand that carries a lot of ghosts. If you’re trying to be an ethical consumer, you’ve got to decide which issue sits heavier on your conscience: the plastic crisis or the geopolitical conflict. There is no "perfect" middle ground here.
What You Can Do Instead
If the SodaStream boycott ethical issues make you uncomfortable, you aren't stuck with store-bought seltzer. You can actually find a middle path.
First, look into brands like Aarke. They are a Swedish company that makes gorgeous carbonators. The best part? They use standard CO2 cylinders that you can get refilled at local hardware stores or through independent carbonation services. You aren't locked into a single ecosystem.
Second, check out local "CO2 refill" businesses. In many cities, there are small shops that will refill your existing tanks for half the price of the brand-name exchange. This keeps your money local and avoids the massive shipping logistics of the big guys.
Third, if you're really committed, you can build a DIY kegerator setup. It sounds hardcore, but it’s just a large CO2 tank, a regulator, and a hose. It’s the most "ethical" way to get bubbles because the tanks last for a year and you're not supporting a massive marketing machine.
The bottom line is that your kitchen counter shouldn't feel like a political battlefield. Take a look at where your money is going, decide what your "non-negotiables" are, and shop accordingly. Whether you keep your machine or switch to a rival, being aware of the history is the first step toward actually being the "conscious consumer" those ads always talk about.