Snoo Bassinet Controversy: What Most People Get Wrong

Snoo Bassinet Controversy: What Most People Get Wrong

You’ve seen the aesthetic. The sleek, mid-century modern legs. The breathable white mesh. The promise of "four extra hours of sleep." For years, the Snoo Smart Sleeper was the ultimate status symbol for exhausted new parents. It wasn't just a bassinet; it was a robot nanny designed by Dr. Harvey Karp, the "baby whisperer" himself. But lately, the conversation around this $1,700 piece of tech has turned sour.

If you’re scrolling through Reddit or parent Facebook groups, you’ll find a mix of frantic praise and deep-seated frustration. It’s not just about the price tag anymore. We are talking about major shifts in how the company operates, surprise paywalls, and some pretty heavy debates about infant safety and development.

👉 See also: Why Your Black Hair Hair Mask Isn't Working (And What Actually Does)

Honestly, the "Snoo bassinet controversy" isn't just one thing. It's a pile of grievances that have come to a head over the last year.

The $20 "Sleep Tax" That Set the Internet on Fire

Basically, the biggest blow to the Snoo’s reputation happened in mid-2024. For years, the Snoo had a massive resale market. Parents would buy a used one for $800, use it for six months, and sell it for $800. It was essentially a free rental. Happiest Baby, the company behind the Snoo, clearly noticed they were losing out on all that secondary revenue.

In July 2024, they dropped a bombshell: a premium subscription model.

Suddenly, features that were always free—like the "weaning mode," sleep tracking logs, and the ability to customize responsiveness—were locked behind a $19.95 per month paywall for anyone who didn't buy the bassinet directly from the company.

Parents were livid. Imagine buying a car and then being told you have to pay a monthly fee to use the windshield wipers. That’s how it felt. One father, Andrew Gwin, actually filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), likening the move to a "subscription trap."

The optics were terrible. You have a company that markets itself as a "mission-driven" lifesaver for sleep-deprived families, yet they chose to "nickel and dime" parents who are already struggling with the high costs of a newborn. Dr. Karp defended the move, saying the company needs revenue to survive because they aren't government-funded. But for a parent who just dropped several hundred dollars on a used unit, that explanation felt pretty hollow.

The FDA Clearance: Is It Really "Safer"?

Then there’s the medical side of things. In 2023, the Snoo received FDA De Novo authorization. The marketing immediately shifted. Suddenly, it was the "first and only medical device" to keep babies on their backs.

But here’s where it gets tricky.

The FDA didn't actually say the Snoo prevents SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). They cleared it as a "supine sleep system"—meaning it keeps babies on their backs, which is the gold standard for safe sleep. However, the FDA's own documentation (DEN210039) explicitly states that the Snoo "has not directly demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of SIDS/SUID."

This distinction is massive.

Critics, including several pediatric occupational therapists, argue that the Snoo might be too good at its job. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) generally advises that once a baby can roll, they should be out of a swaddle. The Snoo uses "safety clips" to keep a baby strapped down, preventing them from rolling even if they’ve reached that developmental milestone.

Some therapists worry this "harnessing" could lead to:

  • Delayed motor skills: If a baby can't practice moving or rolling in their sleep, does it slow down their daytime progress?
  • Flat head syndrome (Plagiocephaly): Because the baby is locked in one position, there’s constant pressure on the back of the skull.
  • Dependency: Some "Snoo babies" struggle to sleep in a regular crib because they’ve become addicted to the constant motion and white noise.

The Most Recent Public Relations Nightmare

If the subscription drama wasn't enough, 2025 brought a heartbreaking story that went viral. An influencer, Brooklyn Larsen, experienced the tragic stillbirth of her son. She had a gifted Snoo sitting in her nursery.

🔗 Read more: Why Shaped Eyebrows Before and After Photos Usually Lie (and How to Get Real Results)

According to her family, the company allegedly "demanded" the bassinet back because she could no longer provide the social media content she had promised.

The backlash was instant and brutal. Celebrity moms like Witney Carson and Allison Kuch publicly slammed the brand for being "insensitive" and "disgusting." Happiest Baby eventually apologized, claiming it was a misunderstanding and that they offer to pick up bassinets to "alleviate the painful reminder" of a loss. But for many, the damage was done. It painted the company as a cold, corporate machine rather than a partner in parenting.

The Reality Check: Should You Still Buy One?

Look, despite the noise, people still buy them. Why? Because when you haven't slept more than 90 minutes at a time for three weeks, you'll pay almost anything for a solution.

But the landscape has changed. If you're looking into a Snoo today, you need to be realistic.

1. The Resale Value is Lower
If you buy used, factor in the $120 extra you’ll spend on the app subscription over six months. If you buy new, check if you’re "grandfathered in" for future kids—the rules on this have been shifting, so read the fine print.

🔗 Read more: How to get out from abusive relationship: The steps people actually miss

2. It’s Not a Magic Bullet
Some babies hate the Snoo. They find the motion too aggressive or the swaddle too restrictive. If you buy one, have a backup plan. Don't assume it will solve your sleep problems overnight.

3. Watch the "Weaning" Phase
One of the biggest complaints in the Snoo bassinet controversy is the transition to the crib. If you use the Snoo on high settings for six months, the transition to a stationary mattress can be a nightmare. Start "weaning mode" (which stops the motion but keeps the sound) much earlier than the company suggests—think four months instead of six.

4. Check for "Stolen" Units
A new trend on the secondhand market involves people selling Snoos that were originally rentals or reported "missing in transit." Happiest Baby can—and will—remotely brick these units. If you’re buying from Facebook Marketplace, ask to see the original digital receipt or have the seller "unpair" the device in front of you.

The Snoo is a tool, not a miracle. It’s a piece of high-end tech that’s currently going through some serious growing pains and corporate scrutiny. Whether it’s worth the drama depends entirely on how much you value your sleep versus your wallet.

If you decide to go the secondhand route, make sure to test the "clipping" mechanism and listen for any grinding noises in the motor. Those are common fail points that the app won't tell you about. Most importantly, trust your gut—if your baby seems more agitated by the motion than soothed, no "FDA clearance" should override your parental intuition.

Practical Next Steps for Parents:

  • Check your employer benefits: Many tech and healthcare companies now offer free Snoo rentals as a perk.
  • Consult your pediatrician: Ask specifically about your baby’s head shape and motor development if you plan to use the Snoo for the full six months.
  • Budget for the "Sleep Tax": If you aren't the original owner, expect to pay the $19.95 monthly fee for the premium app features.