You're staring at your Google Calendar and it looks like a game of Tetris gone wrong. Three candidates. Three hours. No gaps. You think, "I'll just power through it." It sounds efficient, right? You get the hiring manager’s headache out of the way in one afternoon and get back to your real job. But honestly, scheduling interviews back to back is usually a recipe for a hiring disaster.
I’ve seen this play out in high-growth startups and massive corporate machines alike. The logic seems sound on paper. You want to compare candidates while they are fresh in your mind. You want to save time. But by the time the third person walks into the room—or pops up on the Zoom screen—your brain is basically fried toast. You aren't really listening anymore. You're just waiting for them to stop talking so you can grab a coffee or check your Slack notifications.
✨ Don't miss: How Much is an oz of Gold Today: Why Everyone is Watching the 4,600 Barrier
Why Your Brain Rebels Against Back-to-Back Scheduling
There is a real psychological cost to this approach. It’s called cognitive switching penalty. Even if the topic is the same—hiring for a Senior Dev role—each candidate is a whole new universe of data points, personality quirks, and red flags.
When you jump straight from Candidate A to Candidate B, your brain doesn't just "reset." You carry the "residue" of the previous conversation into the next one. Maybe Candidate A was incredibly charismatic but lacked technical depth. Now, you’re subconsciously looking for that same charisma in Candidate B, and if they’re a bit more reserved, you might unfairly judge them as "unprepared" or "low energy." It’s a phenomenon often studied in decision-making science, where the order of events dictates the outcome more than the merits of the individuals.
Think about Decision Fatigue. It’s real.
Researchers famously looked at judicial rulings and found that judges were significantly more likely to grant parole at the beginning of the day or after a food break. By the end of a long session? The answer was almost always "no." If you are deciding whether to offer someone a six-figure salary, do you really want to be making that choice when your glucose levels are tanking and you haven't seen sunlight in three hours?
The Practical Logistics Are a Nightmare
Let's talk about the "overflow effect."
Interviews rarely end exactly on the dot. Someone asks a great question at the 55-minute mark. You don't want to be rude and cut them off, so you stay. Now you’re five minutes late for Candidate B. You start that interview feeling flustered and apologetic. Candidate B feels like you’re disorganized. The "employer brand" you spent so much money building with your fancy LinkedIn careers page? It’s crumbling because you couldn't find five minutes to pee between calls.
🔗 Read more: How Much Is Rosa DeLauro Worth? What the Financial Disclosures Really Show
Plus, when do you write your notes?
If you're scheduling interviews back to back, you’re likely telling yourself, "I'll remember what they said and write it all down at 5:00 PM." You won't. You’ll remember a blurred slurry of "The guy with the blue tie liked Python" and "The woman from Chicago had a great portfolio." Specifics vanish. Nuance dies. You end up hiring the person who was the most "memorable" (often just the loudest or the last one you spoke to) rather than the most qualified.
The Case for the 15-Minute Buffer
If you absolutely must do multiple interviews in one day, the 15-minute buffer is your best friend. It isn't just for a bathroom break. It serves three distinct, professional purposes that actually make you a better recruiter.
- Immediate Synthesis: You spend the first five minutes writing down your gut reaction and specific evidence for or against their skills. This is when the info is "hot."
- Context Reset: You spend five minutes reviewing the next candidate's resume. You remind yourself of their name (crucial!), their specific work history, and the exact questions you need to ask them.
- Human Needs: Five minutes to stand up, stretch, and hydrate.
I once worked with a hiring lead at a fintech firm who insisted on "Marathon Mondays." He would do six interviews in a row. By the end of the day, his feedback for the final two candidates was always "Seems okay" or "I wasn't feeling it." He was wasting the candidates' time and the company's money because he wasn't actually interviewing by 4:00 PM; he was just surviving.
When Back-to-Back Actually Works (Sorta)
Is it ever okay? Maybe.
If you are running a "Super Day" or a mass hiring event where the goal is a quick initial screen, back-to-back can work—but only if you have a partner. If you’re tag-teaming with another interviewer, one person can lead while the other takes notes, and you can swap roles to keep the energy up.
Even then, it’s a grind.
In high-stakes roles, like executive leadership or specialized engineering, back-to-back scheduling is almost always a mistake. These roles require deep diving into "The Why" behind a candidate's decisions. You can't do that if you’re glancing at the clock every thirty seconds to see if the next person is in the waiting room.
Combatting Halo and Horn Effects
When you stack interviews, you increase the risk of the Halo Effect. This is where one positive trait (like they went to the same college as you) colors everything else they say. Conversely, if Candidate A was a "rockstar," Candidate B—who is perfectly competent—might look like a "dud" simply by comparison. This is called Contrast Bias.
By giving yourself even a small gap, you break the psychological link between the two events. You treat each interview as a standalone interaction rather than a chapter in a long, tiring book.
Better Alternatives to the Back-to-Back Grind
Instead of the marathon approach, try these strategies to keep your hiring quality high:
📖 Related: After Hours Gainers and Losers: What Most People Get Wrong
The Sandwich Method
Schedule one interview in the morning and one in the afternoon. This keeps your regular workload moving and prevents "interview burnout." You stay fresh, and the candidate gets the best version of you.
The 45/15 Rule
If you have an hour-long slot, only interview for 45 minutes. Use the last 15 minutes for your own administrative work. If the candidate asks a lot of questions, you have the flexibility to go long without ruining your entire afternoon.
Collaborative Debriefs
If multiple people are interviewing, don't just stack them. Schedule a 15-minute "huddle" immediately after the candidate leaves. This prevents "groupthink" later on and ensures everyone’s raw impressions are captured before they're influenced by the next person in line.
What Candidates Actually Think
You might think you’re being "efficient," but candidates can smell a rushed interviewer a mile away. They notice when you haven't looked at their portfolio in detail. They notice when you ask a question they just answered ten minutes ago because your brain is looping. In a competitive job market, the "candidate experience" is a major differentiator. If they feel like just another number in your conveyor belt, the top-tier talent will go to the company that actually took the time to listen.
Actionable Steps for Your Next Hiring Round
Stop looking at your calendar as a puzzle to be solved and start looking at it as a tool for quality control.
- Audit your last three hires. Did you interview them back-to-back with others? Look at your notes from those sessions. Are they detailed or vague?
- Set a "Hard Gap" policy. Tell your recruiting coordinator or HR team that you require a minimum of 20 minutes between interviews. No exceptions.
- Pre-fill your scorecards. Have your specific "Must-Have" criteria ready before the first person walks in. This keeps you focused on the facts rather than your fading energy levels.
- Eat. It sounds stupidly simple, but low blood sugar is the enemy of fair evaluation. If you’re doing a block of interviews, have a high-protein snack ready.
Hiring is the most expensive thing your company does. It’s the most important thing you do as a manager. Don't compromise the future of your team just because you wanted to "clear your calendar" by Wednesday. Give the candidates—and yourself—the space to actually have a conversation that matters.