We’ve all seen it. The camera lingers a little too long. The lighting gets moody, almost romantic, even though what’s happening on screen is a nightmare. For decades, sexual assault in movies wasn't just a plot point—it was a cheap shorthand for "character development" or a lazy way to show a villain was truly evil. Honestly, it’s been a mess. You’ve probably noticed how older films treat these scenes like a spectacle rather than a trauma. It’s uncomfortable. It’s often unnecessary. And frankly, the way the industry handled these stories for the better part of a century says a lot about who was sitting in the director’s chair.
Things are shifting now.
But to understand where we’re going, we have to look at the wreckage of where we’ve been. Historically, cinema used sexual violence as a "inciting incident" for men. Think about the classic revenge flick. A woman is harmed in the first ten minutes just so the male lead has an excuse to go on a rampage. Her trauma is a prop. It’s a tool. This trope is so common it has its own name in comic book and film circles: "Women in Refrigerators." It basically means a female character is killed or assaulted solely to move a man’s story forward.
The Evolution of Sexual Assault in Movies and the Male Gaze
There’s this concept called the "male gaze," coined by Laura Mulvey back in the 70s. It explains how films are often constructed from the perspective of a heterosexual man. When you apply that to sexual assault in movies, the results are often pretty disturbing. Take a look at the 1970s "exploitation" era. Films like I Spit on Your Grave or The Last House on the Left were marketed as horror, but they spent huge chunks of their runtime depicting sexual violence with a level of graphic detail that felt less like social commentary and more like voyeurism.
It’s a fine line.
Directors often claim they are "showing the brutal reality," but there’s a difference between witnessing trauma and consuming it as entertainment. For a long time, Hollywood didn't care about the difference. In the 1980s, even "prestige" films struggled. Look at The Accused (1988). While Jodie Foster won an Oscar for her performance, the film’s climax is a brutal, extended scene in a bar that many critics today argue was far more graphic than it needed to be to make its point. It was a turning point, sure, because it focused on the victim’s fight for justice, but the visual language was still stuck in that old-school, voyeuristic mindset.
Then you have the "art house" approach. This is where it gets even more complicated. Directors like Gaspar Noé (Irreversible) or Lars von Trier are known for pushing boundaries. In Irreversible, there is a nine-minute, single-take scene that is almost impossible to watch. Noé’s argument was that violence should be repulsive. He wanted to strip away the "Hollywood" polish. But does making the audience suffer actually help us understand the survivor's experience? Many advocates for survivors would say no. It just re-traumatizes the viewer without offering any real insight into the aftermath.
📖 Related: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s
What Hollywood Gets Wrong About Consent
Most people think they know what consent looks like, but movies have spent years blurring the lines. There’s a persistent myth in cinema that "no" actually means "keep trying." You see it in classic romances and 80s comedies all the time. Revenge of the Nerds is a prime example. There’s a scene where a character wears a mask to trick a woman into having sex with him. In the movie, it’s played for laughs. In the real world, that’s a crime.
This "normalized" version of sexual assault in movies is arguably more dangerous than the graphic stuff. Why? Because it’s subtle. It teaches the audience that crossing boundaries is a romantic gesture.
The Rise of the Intimacy Coordinator
If you want to know what’s actually changing in Hollywood, look at the credits. You’ll start seeing a new role: Intimacy Coordinator. This didn't really exist in a meaningful way until the #MeToo movement broke the dam in 2017. Before this, actors were often left to "figure it out" with their co-stars. That led to real-world trauma.
- Maria Schneider in Last Tango in Paris: Years later, Schneider spoke out about how the infamous "butter scene" wasn't fully consensual in terms of how it was filmed. She felt a degree of violation that stayed with her for life.
- The Power Dynamics: On set, the director is king. If a director tells an actor to "go further," many feel they can't say no without ruining their career.
- Safety Protocols: Now, Intimacy Coordinators act like stunt coordinators. They choreograph everything. They ensure everyone has given informed consent for every touch, every look, and every camera angle.
This shift has changed the way sexual assault in movies is filmed. It’s moved away from "let’s see what happens" to "how can we tell this story without harming the performers or the audience?"
Turning the Tide: Movies That Get It Right
Not every depiction is a failure. In recent years, we’ve seen a massive shift toward stories that center on the survivor’s internal life rather than the act of violence itself. Promising Young Woman (2020) is a great example. It subverts the "rape-revenge" genre entirely. Instead of being a mindless action flick, it’s a searing look at how society protects "nice guys" and how trauma lingers long after the event. It doesn't even show the central assault. It doesn't have to. The absence of the footage makes the impact of the grief feel much heavier.
Then there’s Women Talking (2022). This film is a masterclass in handling sexual assault in movies. It’s based on real events that happened in a Mennonite colony in Bolivia. The film focuses entirely on the aftermath—the conversation, the choice between staying and fighting or leaving. It refuses to show the violence. By denying the audience the visual of the assault, director Sarah Polley forces us to listen to the survivors. It’s an act of radical empathy.
👉 See also: Why La Mera Mera Radio is Actually Dominating Local Airwaves Right Now
Honestly, it’s about time.
For too long, the industry relied on the shock factor. But shock wears off. Truth doesn't. When a film like The Tale (2018) explores the way memory twists and turns to protect us from trauma, it offers something much more valuable than a graphic scene. It offers understanding. Jennifer Fox, the director, based it on her own life, and that authenticity shines through in every frame. It’s uncomfortable, yes, but it’s honest.
The Impact on the Audience and Social Perception
Movies don't exist in a vacuum. They shape how we view the world. When sexual assault in movies is treated as a plot device, it devalues the experiences of real-life survivors. It reinforces the idea that trauma is only "valid" if it looks a certain way—usually violent and involving a stranger in a dark alley.
But statistics tell a different story. According to RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network), the vast majority of sexual violence is committed by someone the victim knows. Hollywood is finally starting to catch up to this reality. We’re seeing more stories about "gray area" consent, power imbalances in the workplace, and the slow, grinding process of healing.
We need to stop pretending that "accuracy" requires graphic visuals.
The psychological toll is what matters. When movies focus on the isolation, the gaslighting, and the eventual reclamation of self, they do more than just "entertain." They provide a roadmap for empathy. They help people who have never experienced this understand the weight of it, and they help those who have feel less alone.
✨ Don't miss: Why Love Island Season 7 Episode 23 Still Feels Like a Fever Dream
How to Screen What You Watch
If you’re sensitive to this content, you don't have to go in blind. The industry hasn't quite perfected the "trigger warning" system on streaming platforms yet, but the community has stepped up.
There are practical ways to navigate sexual assault in movies without being blindsided:
- Use "Does the Dog Die?": Don't let the name fool you. This crowdsourced website tracks everything from animal death to sexual violence. It’s incredibly specific. It will tell you if an assault is on-screen, off-screen, or just discussed.
- Check Unconsented: This is a database specifically designed to track sexual violence in film and television. It’s a great resource for seeing if a "must-watch" movie is actually safe for your mental health.
- Read Common Sense Media: While geared toward parents, their "Sex, Violence & Language" breakdowns are often more detailed than the official MPAA ratings.
- Look for the Intimacy Coordinator: If a film is modern, a quick IMDb search for an Intimacy Coordinator can give you peace of mind that the actors were protected during filming, which often translates to a more respectful final product.
The conversation is far from over. We still have "edgy" directors trying to use trauma for clout, and we still have old-school producers who think a "gritty" reboot needs a sexual assault scene to prove it’s for adults. But the audience is getting smarter. We’re demanding better. We’re realizing that the most powerful stories aren't the ones that show us the worst things humans can do, but the ones that show us how we survive them.
If you’re looking to engage with cinema more mindfully, start by paying attention to the "why." If a scene feels like it’s there just to shock you, it probably is. But if it’s there to make you feel the profound weight of a character’s journey, it might be worth the watch. We are moving toward a version of Hollywood that values the survivor over the spectacle. It’s a slow crawl, but it’s happening.
Support films that hire intimacy professionals and prioritize survivor-led narratives. By voting with your views and your wallet, you’re telling the industry that trauma is not a toy. It’s a human experience that deserves dignity, not just a high-definition lens. Look for creators who prioritize "informed viewership" and aren't afraid to leave the most graphic moments in the dark where they belong. The power of cinema isn't in what it shows, but in what it makes us understand.