Let’s be real. If you walk into a used bookstore and head toward the "Classics" section, you’re basically walking into a minefield of dated social norms. Some people call it literary heritage. Others call it a collection of the most sexist books in the world. It’s a messy, uncomfortable conversation because many of these books are actually written well, which makes the cringe-inducing treatment of women even harder to swallow.
We aren't just talking about old Victorian novels where a woman faints because her corset is too tight. We are talking about deep-seated, systemic bias baked into the "Great Canon."
Honestly, it’s kinda wild how long some of these titles have stayed on high school reading lists without a serious disclaimer. You’ve got authors like Ernest Hemingway or Norman Mailer who basically treated female characters as cardboard cutouts or, worse, psychological punching bags. It matters. It matters because the way we read these stories shapes how we view power dynamics today.
The "Great" Authors and the Women They Wrote
Take Hemingway. The man is a legend for his "iceberg theory" of writing. But if you look at The Sun Also Rises, Lady Brett Ashley is basically a "Man’s Woman." She exists to be obsessed over, to be destructive, and to ultimately serve as a catalyst for the men’s existential dread. She’s "liberated," sure, but only in a way that serves the male gaze of the 1920s Lost Generation.
Then there’s the 1960s and 70s. You’d think the sexual revolution would have fixed things? Nope.
Actually, it often made it weirder. Norman Mailer and Charles Bukowski are frequently cited when people discuss the most sexist books in the world. Bukowski’s Women is exactly what it sounds like. It’s a repetitive cycle of a degenerate protagonist using and discarding women who barely have names or personalities beyond their physical descriptions. It’s "gritty," people say. I say it’s exhausting.
The Problem with the "Product of Its Time" Excuse
We hear this all the time: "You have to judge it by the standards of the era!"
✨ Don't miss: Exactly What Month is Ramadan 2025 and Why the Dates Shift
That’s a half-truth.
Even back then, people were calling this stuff out. When D.H. Lawrence was writing Lady Chatterley’s Lover, it wasn’t just the "smut" that bothered people; it was the weird, pseudo-mystical idea that women needed to be "subdued" by a primal male force to be truly happy.
If you look at the 19th century, you have The Taming of the Shrew by Shakespeare. Yeah, it’s a play, but it’s sold in book form everywhere. The entire plot is about "breaking" a headstrong woman like she’s a horse. Seeing that performed or read today without a massive amount of irony is... uncomfortable.
When Literature Becomes Hostile
Sometimes sexism isn't just a side effect; it’s the point.
Take The Incel Rebellion or certain corners of the "Manosphere" literature that have popped up in the last decade. These aren't just dated classics; they are modern manifestos. But if we stick to the mainstream, even "respected" books like Lolita get misread constantly.
Vladimir Nabokov wrote a masterpiece about a monster. The problem? Half the world started treating the book like a tragic romance. This isn't necessarily the book’s fault, but it contributes to a culture where the sexualization of a child is treated as "high art."
🔗 Read more: Dutch Bros Menu Food: What Most People Get Wrong About the Snacks
The Science of Bias in Reading
Studies from the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media and various linguistic researchers have actually tracked how often women speak in "classic" literature. In many of the titles we consider the sexist books in the world, the ratio of male-to-female dialogue is roughly 3:1.
- Women are often described by their age or appearance first.
- Men are described by their profession or their goals.
- The "Bechdel Test" (where two women talk to each other about something other than a man) is failed by a shocking percentage of the Western Canon.
It’s not just about being "offended." It’s about the narrative deprivation of half the human race.
The Modern Twist: Sexism in "Literary Fiction"
You’d think we’d be over this by 2026.
But modern "Bro-lit" is still a thing. These are the books where the male protagonist is a "sad but brilliant" guy who treats his girlfriend like a secondary character in his own tragedy. It’s a more subtle version of the sexism found in The Catcher in the Rye, where Holden Caulfield’s view of women is—let’s face it—pretty patronizing. He puts them on pedestals or thinks they’re "phonies" with very little middle ground.
Why Do We Still Read Them?
Because they’re influential. Because the prose is often beautiful.
You can acknowledge that The Great Gatsby is a brilliantly structured novel while also admitting that Daisy Buchanan is a shallow, "beautiful little fool" because F. Scott Fitzgerald didn't know how (or want) to give her the same interiority as Jay or Nick.
💡 You might also like: Draft House Las Vegas: Why Locals Still Flock to This Old School Sports Bar
Acknowledging sexism doesn't mean we have to burn the books. It means we have to read them with our eyes open. We have to teach them differently. Instead of saying "This is a great book," we should say "This is a great book that has a massive blind spot regarding the humanity of women."
Actionable Steps for the Modern Reader
If you're looking to balance your bookshelf or approach these texts critically, here is how you actually do it without losing your mind.
Audit your shelf. Look at your top 10 favorite books. How many are written by women? How many features a female protagonist who has a goal that has nothing to do with a man? If the answer is "zero," it might be time to branch out.
Read the "Response" novels. For every sexist classic, there is usually a brilliant modern response. If you read The Odyssey, follow it up with Margaret Atwood’s The Penelopiad. It retells the story from the perspective of the women left behind, and it’s a total game-changer.
Contextualize, don't erase. Don't just ignore the sexist books in the world. Read the introductions. Look for annotated versions that explain the historical context of the 1890s or 1950s. Understanding why an author was biased is more educational than just pretending the bias isn't there.
Support contemporary voices. The best way to combat the legacy of sexist literature is to buy books from women, non-binary authors, and men who actually know how to write a three-dimensional female character. Authors like Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie or Zadie Smith offer the complexity that the "Old Masters" often missed.
Watch for the tropes. Start looking for the "Manic Pixie Dream Girl" or the "Disposable Woman" trope. Once you see them, you can’t unsee them. This critical lens makes you a better, sharper reader. It allows you to enjoy the artistry of a book like Ulysses while still rolling your eyes at James Joyce’s weirdly specific hangups.
At the end of the day, literature is a mirror. If the mirror is cracked and only shows us one side of the room, we shouldn't throw the mirror away—we should just probably get a second one to see the rest of the view.