You've probably seen them. Those grainy, black-and-white, slightly ghostly images floating around Reddit or Twitter. Two skeletal figures locked in an intimate embrace, their ribs and femurs glowing against a dark void. It's the classic sex on x-ray trope that periodically goes viral, sparking a mix of curiosity and "is that even safe?" panic. But honestly, most of what you see online isn't what it seems. Some are art. Some are fake. And the real ones? They come from a very specific, very weird corner of medical history that had nothing to do with getting clicks on social media.
We need to talk about what's actually happening in these images. Science doesn't usually care about your bedroom antics unless they result in a trip to the ER, but back in the 90s, a few researchers decided to peek behind the curtain—or rather, through the skin.
The 1999 Study: When Science Met the Bedroom
If you're looking for the definitive source of a real sex on x-ray (or more accurately, an MRI), you have to look at the work of Pek van Andel and his colleagues at University Hospital Groningen. This wasn't some underground film project. It was a legitimate, peer-reviewed study published in the British Medical Journal titled "Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal."
They didn't use X-rays. They used MRI. Why? Because X-rays are basically a one-way ticket to unnecessary radiation exposure for your reproductive organs. Nobody in the medical community is going to green-light a "just for fun" X-ray of intercourse. It’s a massive ethics violation. MRI, however, uses magnets. No radiation.
The study was fascinatingly awkward. Participants had to perform inside a narrow, banging, clanging tube. The goal wasn't just voyeurism; the researchers wanted to see if the internal anatomy moved the way the textbooks said it did. Specifically, they wanted to disprove the "penis captivus" myth and see how the uterus shifted during arousal. They found that the "S-shape" often depicted in anatomical drawings of the vagina was actually more of a "boomerang" shape during intercourse. It changed our understanding of internal positioning, but it also proved that doing it for science is incredibly difficult and cramped.
🔗 Read more: Creatine Explained: What Most People Get Wrong About the World's Most Popular Supplement
Why Real Sex on X-ray Images Are Rare (and Dangerous)
Let's get real about the physics for a second. An X-ray works by shooting ionizing radiation through the body. Dense stuff like bone blocks the rays and shows up white. Soft tissue, like skin or organs, shows up as gray shadows. If you actually tried to capture sex on x-ray, you wouldn't get a crisp, romantic image. You’d get a blurry mess of overlapping bones and gray blobs.
The primary reason we don't see authentic medical X-rays of this is the ALARA principle. That stands for "As Low As Reasonably Achievable." Radiologists live by this. You don't zap someone unless there's a clinical need. Since there is zero medical reason to X-ray people while they’re having sex, any "real" image you find is almost certainly a composite or a piece of digital art.
The Art vs. The Reality
Most of the famous images you see—like the ones by artist Wim Delvoye—are art. Delvoye created a series of "X-ray" works that look like people in various states of intimacy or mundane activity. They’re stunning. They’re provocative. They are also totally faked using a mix of real medical scans and heavy Photoshop. He wasn't actually irradiating couples in a lab; he was making a statement about the body as a machine.
Then there’s the "Foreign Body" X-ray category. Ask any ER doctor or radiologic technologist. They've seen plenty of things that started as sex but ended up as a diagnostic image. From lightbulbs to spray cans, the "I slipped and fell on it" stories are a rite of passage for medical residents. These are the only times you’ll find legitimate sexual activity-adjacent X-rays in a hospital database, and they are significantly less romantic than the viral memes.
💡 You might also like: Blackhead Removal Tools: What You’re Probably Doing Wrong and How to Fix It
The Biological Mechanics Exposed
When we look at these scans, whether they are the BMJ MRI images or the artistic X-ray recreations, they reveal some weird truths about our bodies.
- Space is at a premium. We like to think there’s a lot of "room" inside, but the bladder, rectum, and reproductive organs are all fighting for the same square inchage. In the 1999 MRI study, you can clearly see the bladder being compressed almost flat.
- Bone doesn't move as much as you think. In an X-ray view, the pelvis is a rigid cage. The "action" is all soft tissue, which, as mentioned, looks like blurry smoke on a standard radiograph.
- The "Boomerang" effect. The most significant find from the Groningen study was that the penis actually bends. It follows the curve of the vaginal canal, which isn't a straight line. On a scan, this looks profoundly strange, almost like the anatomy is defying the "rigid" logic we're taught in health class.
Safety, Radiation, and the "Don't Try This at Home" Factor
It should go without saying, but don't try to bribe a tech to let you take a sex on x-ray selfie. Aside from the fact that they’d lose their license instantly, the health risks are localized. Your gonads are the most radiation-sensitive parts of your body. Frequent or unnecessary exposure can lead to mutations or fertility issues. Lead aprons exist for a reason.
There's also the "motion blur" issue. X-rays require you to be still. If you move, the image is ruined. So, even if you found a rogue radiologist, the resulting image would likely look like a smudge of charcoal. This is why the BMJ study used MRI; it can capture "slices" of the body, though even then, the participants had to remain perfectly still for several minutes at a time during the scan. Imagine trying to maintain a "pose" in a freezing cold medical machine while a giant magnet screams at you. Not exactly a mood setter.
What People Get Wrong About "X-ray Vision"
Pop culture has ruined our perception of what X-rays can do. We think of them as see-through cameras. In reality, they are density maps. If you were to look at sex on x-ray, you wouldn't see the passion or the skin; you'd see two skeletons overlapping in a way that makes it hard to tell where one spine ends and the other begins.
📖 Related: 2025 Radioactive Shrimp Recall: What Really Happened With Your Frozen Seafood
Many "viral" images are actually "Fluoroscopy" videos. Fluoroscopy is like a real-time X-ray movie. It’s used for things like checking swallow reflexes or placing stents. Again, the radiation dose is high. Any "leaked" fluoroscopy video of intimacy is almost certainly from a staged adult film production using specialized (and likely unsafe) equipment, not a hospital.
Actionable Insights for the Curious
If you’re fascinated by the intersection of anatomy and intimacy, there are better (and safer) ways to explore it than hunting for fake X-rays.
- Study the BMJ "Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals" paper. It’s open access. Look at the actual cross-sections. It’s more "scientific" and far more revealing about how the body actually accommodates a partner than any artistic X-ray.
- Understand the limits of imaging. Recognize that soft tissue (muscles, skin, nerves) is where sexual sensation happens, and X-rays are notoriously bad at showing soft tissue. You're looking at the wrong medium for the message.
- Appreciate the art for what it is. If you like the aesthetic of Wim Delvoye or similar artists, enjoy it as a commentary on the "industrialization" of the human body, but don't mistake it for a medical document.
- Respect the "Foreign Body" rule. If something goes wrong during a real-life encounter and an object is involved, go to the ER. They’ve seen it all. They will take an X-ray, they will be professional, and they will help you. Don't let embarrassment keep you from medical care; that's the only time a sex-related X-ray is actually necessary.
The human body is an incredible piece of engineering. While the idea of seeing sex on x-ray feels like the ultimate peek behind the curtain, the reality is that our skeletons are just the frame. The real "magic" is in the parts that X-rays can't see—the blood flow, the nerve endings, and the brain chemistry. Those don't show up on a radiograph, no matter how high you crank the voltage.
Next Steps for Deep Learners
To truly understand how internal anatomy functions without the radiation risk, look into "Dynamic MRI" studies. These are used to diagnose pelvic floor disorders and offer a much clearer view of how internal organs shift during physical stress or movement. It's the same technology used in the famous 1999 study but applied to modern medicine to help people with real-world physical issues. You’ll get the anatomical clarity you’re looking for without the "internet hoax" baggage.