If you’ve spent any time in the neurodiversity-affirming world lately, you’ve probably heard people talking about "gestalts" or "scripting." It’s everywhere. But honestly, most of the advice out there about gestalt language processing goals is still stuck in the 1990s. We are still seeing therapists and teachers trying to "extinguish" scripts, which is basically like trying to tell a person who speaks French that they aren't allowed to use verbs anymore. It’s frustrating. It’s counterproductive.
Most of us were taught that children learn language by building blocks—one word, then two words, then a sentence. That’s "Analytic Language Processing." But for a huge chunk of the population, especially autistic kids, that’s just not how the brain works. They pick up "chunks" or whole phrases tied to a specific emotional moment. If a kid says "To infinity and beyond!" every time they feel excited, they aren't just quoting a movie. They are communicating a feeling. When we set goals for these kids, we have to stop treating the script as a problem to be solved and start treating it as the foundation it actually is.
Why Your Current Gestalt Language Processing Goals Might Be Failing
Traditional speech therapy goals often focus on "labels." You know the drill: "The student will identify 10 common objects." But for a gestalt processor, "apple" might mean nothing, while the entire song about apples they heard on YouTube is their way of asking for a snack. If your goal is to force them to say "apple," you're actually taking a step backward. You're stripping away their fluency.
Marge Blanc, who literally wrote the book on this (Natural Language Acquisition on the Autism Spectrum), has shown that the path to original, flexible language isn't through single words. It’s through the stages of Natural Language Acquisition (NLA). If you don't know what stage a child is in, your goals are basically just shots in the dark. You can't ask a kid to combine original words (Stage 4) when they are still deeply immersed in Stage 1 strings. It’s like asking someone to run a marathon when they’re still learning how to balance on their feet.
The Stages That Actually Matter
First, we have Stage 1. This is the "Gotta Catch 'Em All" phase of language. Kids are soaking up big strings of sound. These gestalts are often unmitigated, meaning they can't be broken down yet. A goal here isn't about reducing the scripting. It's about expanding the library. You want to give them more gestalts that are actually useful. Instead of just movie quotes, we model "Let's go find it" or "It’s time to eat." We call these "mitigable gestalts" because they are easier to break apart later.
✨ Don't miss: High Protein in a Blood Test: What Most People Get Wrong
Moving into Mitigation
Stage 2 is where the magic starts to happen. This is mitigation. The child starts to realize that those big chunks of sound can be hacked. They take the end of one script and tack it onto the beginning of another. If they have "Let's go to the park" and "I want some juice," they might suddenly say "Let's go juice." It sounds grammatically "wrong" to an analytic processor, but in the world of gestalt language processing goals, this is a massive win. It’s a sign of a brain starting to deconstruct the code.
The Transition to Original Language
Stages 3 through 6 are the long game. Stage 3 is about isolating single words. Not for labeling, but for "referencing." This is a weird, messy stage where kids might just say "blue" or "truck" over and over. They are testing the atoms of language. By Stage 4, 5, and 6, they are building their own grammar. It won't look like a textbook for a long time. It will be clunky. But it will be theirs.
How to Write Goals That Don't Suck
If you're a parent or a professional, you need to be specific. Stop using words like "appropriate" or "functional." Those are subjective and, frankly, kind of rude. What’s functional for a gestalt processor is different than what’s functional for you.
- Bad Goal: "Child will stop using delayed echolalia during circle time." (This is literally asking them to stop talking.)
- Good Goal: "Child will increase their repertoire of mitigable Stage 1 gestalts to include at least 5 phrases for transitions."
- Better Goal: "Child will demonstrate Stage 2 mitigation by combining portions of two different gestalts to communicate a novel need."
Notice the difference? The second and third goals respect the child's neurology. They don't try to "fix" the autism; they support the language development. You're looking for growth, not compliance. Honestly, if a child is happy and communicating through scripts, they are doing great. The goal is simply to help them get to the point where they don't have to rely on a pre-recorded line to say what’s on their mind.
🔗 Read more: How to take out IUD: What your doctor might not tell you about the process
Real World Examples of Gestalt Success
I remember a kid who used to say "The floor is lava!" whenever he was overwhelmed. His previous therapist tried to teach him to say "I am frustrated." It never worked. Why? Because "I am frustrated" had no emotional weight for him. It was a boring, flat phrase. "The floor is lava" captured the urgency, the heat, and the "I-need-to-get-out-of-here" feeling perfectly.
The goal we set wasn't to replace the lava phrase. It was to model similar high-emotion gestalts like "Oh no, it’s too much!" or "I need a break right now!" Eventually, he started mixing them. "The floor is... a break!" It was Stage 2 mitigation in the wild. He was using the structure of his favorite game to signal a need for space. That is what a successful gestalt language processing goal looks like.
The Problem with "Functional Communication"
We need to have a serious talk about the phrase "functional communication Training" or FCT. In many behavioral circles, this involves prompt-fading to get a kid to use a "power word" like "help" or "more." While well-intentioned, this can be a disaster for gestalt processors. If you force a Stage 1 processor to use a single word like "help," you might be creating a "stuck" word that they can't ever mitigate or build upon. They might learn that "help" is just a sound they make to get a reward, rather than a piece of a larger linguistic puzzle.
It is much better to model a phrase like "Can you help me with this?" because it has a rhythm. Gestalt processors are incredibly sensitive to intonation and prosody. They hear the music of language before they hear the lyrics. If you model language like a robot, they won't pick it up. If you model it with drama and melody, it sticks.
💡 You might also like: How Much Sugar Are in Apples: What Most People Get Wrong
Practical Steps for Parents and Clinicians
Stop "testing" the child. If you’re asking "What’s this?" or "What color is the ball?", you are putting them on the spot. This often triggers more scripting or total shutdown. Instead, become a narrator. Comment on what you’re doing using "we" or "I" language. "We’re heading to the car" is much more useful than "Where are we going?"
Actionable Next Steps:
- Acknowledge every script. Even if you don't understand it. Smile, nod, or repeat the intonation back. This validates that their "mode" of communication is working.
- Start a Language Log. Write down exactly what the child says, the context, and what movie/show/game it came from. You’ll start to see patterns. You’ll realize that "The wipers on the bus" actually means "I'm bored and want to leave."
- Consult with a professional trained in Natural Language Acquisition (NLA). Check the Meaningful Speech registry. There are a lot of SLPs out there who are still learning this, and having a mentor makes a world of difference.
- Prioritize sensory regulation. A dysregulated brain cannot move through language stages. If a child is stuck in repetitive Stage 1 scripts, they might be using them to self-soothe. Focus on the sensory needs first, and the language will often follow naturally.
- Ditch the flashcards. Seriously. Unless the child is obsessed with them for fun, they aren't helping a gestalt processor build a flexible language system. Use real-life experiences—bubbles, swings, snacks, and messy play—to model new gestalts.
Language development isn't a race to see who can sound "normal" the fastest. It’s about connection. When we set gestalt language processing goals, we are building a bridge between their unique way of thinking and the rest of the world. It takes patience, and it requires us to be more observant than we were ever trained to be. But when that first original sentence finally pops out—even if it's "I want more lava juice"—it’s better than any "standard" sentence you could have prompted.