You're reading a book. You know exactly what the hero is thinking because the author is glued to their brain. That’s standard. But then, suddenly, the perspective shifts to a bystander—a shopkeeper watching the hero stumble down the street, or a cynical crow perched on a telephone wire. That's secondary point of view. It’s messy. It’s effective. Honestly, it’s one of the hardest things to pull off without making your reader throw the book across the room in frustration.
Most people think POV is a binary choice. You either go first-person ("I did the thing") or third-person ("They did the thing"). But the secondary perspective—often called a peripheral or secondary narrator—occupies this weird, fertile middle ground. It’s about looking at the sun through a tinted window instead of staring directly at the light.
Think about The Great Gatsby. Jay Gatsby is the star, the myth, the title character. But we don't see the world through Gatsby's eyes. We see it through Nick Carraway. Nick is a secondary point of view character. He’s there, he’s involved, but he isn't the one driving the Ferrari into the proverbial ditch. He’s just the guy in the passenger seat trying to make sense of the wreckage.
Why We Lean on the Outsider
Why do writers do this? Why not just give us Gatsby’s internal monologue? Because mystery is a powerful drug. When you use a secondary point of view, you create a gap between what the main character does and what the narrator thinks they’re doing. This gap is where the magic happens. It allows for irony. It allows for doubt.
Sometimes the hero is too close to the action to be reliable. If you're writing a story about a person descending into madness, they might think they’re perfectly sane. A secondary observer, however, sees the unwashed dishes piling up and the frantic pacing. They provide the "reality check" the reader needs.
Take Sherlock Holmes. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle knew that if we were inside Sherlock’s head, the mystery would be over in three pages. We’d see the chemical equations and the minute observations of boot leather instantly. By using Dr. Watson—a secondary POV—Doyle keeps the genius at a distance. We feel Watson’s confusion, which mirrors our own. It builds tension. It makes the eventual reveal feel earned rather than explained.
👉 See also: Why the Man Black Hair Blue Eyes Combo is So Rare (and the Genetics Behind It)
The Risks of Shifting Perspectives
It’s not all sunshine and literary awards, though. Shifting to a secondary perspective can be jarring. You’ve probably felt it—that "POV whiplash" where you finally care about Character A, and the author suddenly forces you to care about Character B's grocery list.
The biggest mistake is lack of purpose. If your secondary POV doesn't offer a unique lens or information the protagonist couldn't possibly know, it’s just filler. Readers are smart. They can smell a stalling tactic from a mile away. You have to give that secondary voice a distinct personality. If they sound exactly like the protagonist, why are they even there?
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, we get a nested doll situation. Robert Walton writes to his sister, then Victor Frankenstein tells his story, then the Creature tells his story. Each shift changes how we feel about the central conflict. Without the Creature’s secondary perspective, he’s just a silent monster. With it, he’s a tragic, rejected child. That’s the power of shifting the camera.
Secondary Point of View in the Digital Age
This isn't just for dusty old novels. You see this in modern gaming and digital storytelling constantly. Think about "silent protagonists" in RPGs. The world reacts to you, but the story is often told through the journals of secondary characters you find along the way. You learn about the "Hero of Time" not through their own words, but through the legends and fears of the people living in the villages you visit.
In journalism, this happens when a reporter follows a campaigner. We don't just get the politician's stump speech; we get the reporter’s observation of the sweat on the politician's brow or the way the crowd thins out near the back. That secondary lens provides the "vibe" that a direct quote can't capture. It's the difference between a transcript and a story.
✨ Don't miss: Chuck E. Cheese in Boca Raton: Why This Location Still Wins Over Parents
How to Execute the Shift Without Losing the Reader
If you're trying to weave this into your own work, you need to be subtle. Don't announce the change with a neon sign. Use "hooks."
- Environmental Cues: Start the new POV in the same physical space where the last one ended.
- The "Passing the Torch" Method: Have the primary character look at the secondary character right before the break.
- Voice Differentiation: Change the sentence structure. If your main character is a verbose professor, make your secondary POV a blunt, short-sentenced mechanic.
It’s about contrast.
There's also the "unreliable secondary narrator" trope. This is where the person telling the story is actually lying or misinterpreting everything. It creates a puzzle for the reader to solve. Agatha Christie was the master of this. She’d put the camera in the hands of the one person you’d never suspect, and because they were the "secondary" lens, you trusted them implicitly. Until you shouldn't have.
The Nuance of Perspective
We often confuse "Secondary POV" with "Third Person Omniscient." They aren't the same. Omniscient POV is like a god looking down—it knows everything. A secondary POV is a human (or a dog, or a ghost) with limitations. They can’t see through walls. They can’t read minds unless the character says what they're thinking.
This limitation is actually a gift. It forces the writer to show, not tell. Instead of saying "John was angry," the secondary narrator says, "John gripped his coffee mug so hard I thought the ceramic would shatter."
🔗 Read more: The Betta Fish in Vase with Plant Setup: Why Your Fish Is Probably Miserable
Actionable Steps for Using Secondary POV
If you want to experiment with this, start small.
- Rewrite a Scene: Take a scene you've already written from your protagonist's view. Now, write it from the perspective of the waiter serving them dinner. What does the waiter notice that the hero missed? Maybe the hero didn't notice they were being followed, but the waiter saw the man in the trench coat by the door.
- Define the "Gaze": What is this character's bias? A thief will look at a room and see exits and valuables. A mother might look at the same room and see sharp corners and choking hazards. Give your secondary POV a "specialty."
- Check the Stakes: Why does this secondary person care? If they have no skin in the game, the reader won't care either. Even if they are just an observer, the events should affect them emotionally or physically.
- Watch the "I": If you're using a first-person secondary narrator (like Watson), make sure they don't become the protagonist by accident. They are the lens, not the light.
Focus on the gaps. What is being left unsaid? What is the main character hiding from themselves that only an outsider could see? That’s where you’ll find the meat of your story.
Secondary point of view isn't just a technical choice. It’s a psychological one. It acknowledges that no one story is the whole truth. There is always someone else watching, someone else with a different set of prejudices and observations, standing just off-center, waiting to tell you what they saw. Use that voice. It’s usually the most interesting one in the room.
Identify the "mystery" in your lead character. If they are too transparent, a secondary POV will feel redundant. But if they are enigmatic, a secondary observer becomes the reader’s best friend. Start by identifying one crucial piece of information the hero doesn't know about themselves and let the secondary character be the one to discover it. This creates immediate narrative tension and justifies the shift in perspective.
***