It sits right there on the marsh. If you’ve ever driven toward Hampton Beach on a hot July day, you’ve seen it—that massive, grey concrete dome looming over the tall grass and the winding tidal creeks. That’s Seabrook Station. It’s the only New Hampshire nuclear power plant, and honestly, it’s probably one of the most controversial pieces of real estate in the entire Northeast. People either see it as the literal savior of the New England power grid or a lingering ghost of 1970s industrial overreach. There isn't much middle ground.
Most folks just zoom past it to get to the boardwalk, but the story of how that plant got built is wild. It’s a story of massive protests, bankruptcy, and a radical shift in how we think about "green" energy today.
The Massive Scale of Seabrook Station
Seabrook isn't just a local landmark; it’s a powerhouse. Literally. We’re talking about a single-unit pressurized water reactor that cranks out about 1,248 megawatts. To put that in perspective, that is enough electricity to power more than a million homes. It provides roughly 40% of all the electricity generated in New Hampshire. That’s huge. If Seabrook went offline tomorrow, the lights in Manchester, Nashua, and Portsmouth wouldn't just flicker—the entire regional grid, managed by ISO New England, would go into a total tailspin.
The plant uses a Westinghouse four-loop design. It pulls cool water from the Atlantic Ocean through these enormous tunnels—we're talking 19 feet in diameter—extending three miles out under the seabed. It’s a feat of engineering that most people don’t really think about when they’re plugging in their iPhones. But the sheer volume of water moving through those pipes is staggering.
Why There’s Only One Unit (Instead of Two)
If you look at the site from the air, it looks... unfinished. Because it is.
The original plan back in the early 70s was for two identical reactors. But then the 1980s happened. Construction costs didn’t just rise; they exploded. Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH) basically bet the entire farm on this project, and they lost. By 1988, they became the first major American utility to go bankrupt since the Great Depression. It was a mess. Unit 2 was eventually scrapped when it was about 25% complete. Now, that second spot just sits there, a multi-billion dollar reminder of how hard it is to build nuclear in America.
The Clamshell Alliance. You’ve gotta know that name if you want to understand the New Hampshire nuclear power plant. Back in 1977, more than 1,400 people were arrested at the site in one of the biggest acts of civil disobedience in U.S. history. They were terrified of a meltdown, especially with the 1979 Three Mile Island accident fresh in everyone's minds. The protests didn't stop the plant, but they slowed it down so much that the interest on the loans basically ate the project alive.
The "Concrete Cancer" Controversy
Lately, the conversation has shifted from "will it explode?" to "is the building falling apart?"
📖 Related: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
Scientists call it Alkali-Silica Reaction, or ASR. Basically, it’s a chemical reaction between the silica in the concrete aggregate and the alkali in the cement. When it gets wet—which happens a lot in a salty coastal marsh—it creates a gel that expands and causes micro-cracks. Critics and watchdog groups like C-10 have been sounding the alarm for years, calling it "concrete cancer."
NextEra Energy, the company that owns Seabrook now, insists it’s manageable. They’ve implemented a massive monitoring program. They argue that the sheer thickness of those walls—several feet of reinforced concrete—means the structural integrity is still totally fine. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) seems to agree, because they granted Seabrook a license extension in 2019.
The plant is now cleared to run until 2050.
Think about that. A plant that started construction in 1976 will be operating into the middle of the 21st century. That’s a long life for any piece of machinery, let alone a nuclear reactor.
The Carbon Argument: Is Nuclear the New Green?
Here is where things get really complicated. Twenty years ago, environmentalists were almost universally against Seabrook. Today? It’s a split camp.
If New Hampshire wants to hit any kind of carbon reduction goals, Seabrook is basically the only way to do it right now. Solar and wind are growing, sure, but they can't provide that "baseload" power—the stuff that stays on when the wind isn't blowing and the sun is down. Seabrook prevents about 4 million tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere every year. That’s like taking 800,000 cars off the road.
For a lot of climate activists, the New Hampshire nuclear power plant is a "necessary evil." They don't love the radioactive waste (which is still stored on-site in dry casks, by the way, because the feds still haven't built a permanent national repository), but they hate climate change more.
👉 See also: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think
What Most People Get Wrong About Safety
People hear "nuclear" and they think Chernobyl or Fukushima. But Seabrook is a different beast. It’s a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR). In this design, the water that touches the reactor core stays in a closed loop. It never leaves the containment building. It uses a heat exchanger to turn a secondary loop of water into steam to spin the turbines.
- The Containment: That dome isn't just a roof. It’s steel-lined, reinforced concrete designed to withstand the impact of a large jetliner.
- The Cooling: Even if the main pumps fail, there are multiple backup systems, including diesel generators that are tested constantly.
- The Zone: There’s a 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) around the plant. If you live in Seabrook, Hampton, or even parts of Massachusetts like Salisbury, you probably have a calendar in your kitchen telling you exactly what to do if the sirens go off.
Does that mean it's 100% safe? Nothing is. But the level of oversight at a US nuclear plant is bordering on obsessive. There are NRC inspectors who literally live at the site. They have their own offices there. They see everything.
The Economic Engine Nobody Sees
Seabrook is the largest taxpayer in the town of Seabrook. By a lot. It pays millions in property taxes every year, which keeps the local schools funded and the tax rate for residents relatively low compared to neighboring towns.
Then there are the "outages." Every 18 months or so, the plant shuts down to refuel. It sounds like a quiet time, but it’s the opposite. Over 1,000 extra workers flood into the Seacoast area. They stay in the hotels, eat at the restaurants, and buy gas. It’s a massive, multi-million dollar shot in the arm for the local economy during the off-season.
The Reality of Radioactive Waste
We have to talk about the waste. This is the Achilles' heel of the whole industry. Since there is no central place to put spent fuel, Seabrook has to keep it all right there on the coast.
First, the spent fuel rods go into a deep pool of water to cool down for several years. Once they’re cool enough, they’re moved into "dry casks"—huge concrete and steel cylinders. They just sit there on a concrete pad. NextEra says they’re safe from everything from earthquakes to floods. But for locals, it’s a bit nerve-wracking knowing that stuff is going to be there for decades, maybe centuries, because the government can't figure out where else to put it.
The Future of Energy in the Granite State
Is Seabrook going anywhere? Not anytime soon. With the 2019 license renewal, the plant is the backbone of New Hampshire’s energy strategy for the next quarter-century.
✨ Don't miss: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened
However, the industry is changing. There’s a lot of talk about "Small Modular Reactors" (SMRs) these days—smaller, cheaper, safer versions of the big plants. Some wonder if the empty Unit 2 pad at Seabrook could eventually host one of these. It’s just talk for now, but as the grid gets hungrier for carbon-free power, nothing is off the table.
Actionable Insights for New Hampshire Residents
If you live near the plant or just care about your power bill, there are a few things you should actually do rather than just worrying about the headlines.
1. Monitor the ASR Reports
The NRC keeps a public record of the concrete degradation at Seabrook. You don’t have to be a nuclear engineer to read the executive summaries. If you want the truth without the spin from either the company or the activists, go straight to the NRC’s "Seabrook License Renewal" page.
2. Understand Your Evacuation Zone
If you live within 10 miles of the plant, know your letter. The EPZ is divided into sectors. You should know if you’re in Sector A, B, or C, and where your designated reception center is (usually a school or arena further inland). Most towns distribute this info annually, but you can find the maps on the NH Department of Safety website.
3. Watch the ISO New England Dashboard
If you’re curious about how much Seabrook actually matters, look at the ISO Express dashboard online. It shows the "Fuel Mix" in real-time. On a cold winter night when natural gas prices spike, you’ll see Seabrook sitting there, providing a steady, unwavering chunk of the state’s power.
4. Engage with the Community Outreach Team
NextEra runs a community outreach center. They actually do tours and educational sessions (though security is obviously tight). If you have questions about the sirens or the dry cask storage, ask them directly. They’re surprisingly transparent because they have to be—the PR stakes are too high for them to be secretive.
Seabrook Station isn't going anywhere. It’s a relic of a different era that has become essential for a future that’s trying to move away from fossil fuels. It's complicated, it's a bit scary to some, and it's incredibly expensive. But for now, it's the heartbeat of New Hampshire’s power grid.