We like to think we’re pretty smart. We’ve mapped the human genome, landed rovers in Martian craters, and even figured out how to photograph a black hole. But there’s a massive, gaping hole in our collective knowledge that’s kinda humbling. Despite all the telescopes and the billions of dollars spent scanning the stars, science has not yet taught us if life exists anywhere else in the universe. It’s the ultimate "we don't know" in a world that hates admitting ignorance.
Honestly, it’s frustrating.
You’d think with trillions of galaxies, we’d have a "yes" or "no" by now. Instead, we have a lot of "maybe" and "well, technically." We are stuck in this weird limbo where the math says the universe should be crawling with life, but the silence from the sky is deafening. This is the Fermi Paradox in a nutshell—the contradiction between high probability and zero evidence.
The chemistry of maybe
When we talk about whether we’re alone, we usually start with water. It’s the universal solvent, the stuff that makes the magic happen here on Earth. But science has not yet taught us if water is a strict requirement or just a local preference. We look for "Earth-like" planets because that's our only data point. It's like trying to guess what every restaurant in the world serves when you've only ever eaten at one taco stand in Ohio.
Amino acids—the building blocks of protein—have been found on meteorites like the Murchison meteorite that fell in Australia in 1969. That’s a huge deal. It means the "ingredients" for life are floating around in space like cosmic confetti. But ingredients aren't a meal. Having flour and eggs in your pantry doesn't mean a cake is going to spontaneously bake itself. We still don't understand the "spark"—the exact moment non-living chemicals decided to start reproducing.
Biogenesis is the mystery.
Dr. Nick Lane at University College London has done some incredible work on how life might have started in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. His theory suggests that chemical gradients in these vents acted like natural batteries. It’s a compelling argument. But even he would tell you that we haven't replicated the "start" button in a lab. We can see the components, but the assembly manual is missing.
Mars and the ghost of fossils past
If you want to see where the search is getting heated, look at Mars. Specifically, Jezero Crater. NASA’s Perseverance rover is currently scratching at the dirt there because we know it was once an ancient lake bed.
📖 Related: Why the time on Fitbit is wrong and how to actually fix it
The delta deposits there are prime real estate for biosignatures. But here’s the kicker: even if Perseverance finds a rock that looks like a fossilized microbe, the scientific community will argue about it for decades. Remember the ALH84001 meteorite back in 1996? President Clinton even gave a speech about it. Researchers thought they found "micro-fossils" in a rock from Mars. Years later, most scientists think those structures were just weird mineral formations.
Nature is great at faking the look of life.
This highlights a massive problem. Science has not yet taught us if we can even recognize alien life if it doesn't look like us. We are looking for DNA and RNA because that’s what we know. But what if life on a moon like Enceladus uses a completely different solvent? What if it’s based on silicon instead of carbon? We might be staring right at an alien ecosystem and seeing nothing but "interesting geology."
The "Great Filter" and why silence is scary
There’s a concept called the Great Filter. It’s the idea that at some point in the development of life, there’s a wall that almost nobody hits.
Maybe it’s the transition from simple cells to complex ones. Maybe it’s the discovery of nuclear weapons or the accidental creation of a world-ending AI. If we find out that Mars was once full of life that went extinct, that’s actually bad news for humans. It would mean the "filter" is ahead of us, not behind us. It suggests that life is easy to start but almost impossible to maintain long-term.
We’re basically waiting for a signal that never comes. SETI (the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) has been listening for decades. They’ve had a few "blips," like the famous "Wow! Signal" in 1977. 72 seconds of a narrow-band radio signal that fit the profile of something intentional. But it never happened again. It’s the cosmic equivalent of someone tapping you on the shoulder in a crowd, and when you turn around, nobody’s there.
Technosignatures vs. Biosignatures
Lately, the focus has shifted from looking for "green slime" to looking for "engines." This is the hunt for technosignatures.
👉 See also: Why Backgrounds Blue and Black are Taking Over Our Digital Screens
Think about it. Earth is leaking radio waves, laser pulses, and even atmospheric pollution. If an alien astronomer was looking at Earth from 50 light-years away, they might see the CFCs in our atmosphere. Those don't occur naturally. They’d know someone was living here, probably someone who isn't great at taking care of their planet.
- Dyson Spheres: Megastructures built around stars to harvest energy.
- Atmospheric Pollution: Finding nitrogen dioxide or other industrial gases on an exoplanet.
- Optical Beams: Intense laser pulses used for communication or propulsion.
But again, science has not yet taught us if these things are even practical for a highly advanced civilization. Maybe they move past radio waves in a hundred years. Maybe they use neutrinos or something we haven't even dreamt of yet. We are trying to catch a 5G signal with a tin can and some string.
The James Webb factor
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is our best bet right now. It’s not just for pretty pictures of nebulae. It can "sniff" the atmospheres of planets orbiting other stars through spectroscopy. When a planet passes in front of its star, the starlight filters through the planet's atmosphere. By looking at which colors of light are blocked, scientists can tell if there’s methane, carbon dioxide, or oxygen.
In 2023, JWST found traces of methane and carbon dioxide on K2-18b, a "Hycean" world (a planet with a hydrogen-rich atmosphere and a water ocean). They even found hints of dimethyl sulfide (DMS). On Earth, DMS is only produced by life—specifically phytoplankton in marine environments.
Is that the smoking gun? Not yet.
The data is "noisy." Scientists are still arguing over whether the signal is real or just a glitch in the processing. This is how science actually works. It isn't a "Eureka" moment in a movie. It’s twenty years of peer-reviewed papers calling each other wrong until a consensus slowly forms.
Why the answer matters for our survival
You might wonder why we spend billions on this. It feels like a luxury. But knowing if we are a fluke or a standard feature of the universe changes everything about our philosophy, our religion, and our future.
✨ Don't miss: The iPhone 5c Release Date: What Most People Get Wrong
If life is everywhere, then the universe is a garden. If we are truly alone, then Earth isn't just a planet; it’s a miracle. It makes our petty wars and environmental neglect look even more insane. We’d be the only flame in a dark, infinite room.
The reality is that science has not yet taught us if our biology is a cosmic inevitability or a freak accident. We are currently an N=1 experiment. You can’t derive a universal law from a single sample.
Moving forward in the dark
Since we don't have the answer yet, what do we do? We have to stop looking for "Earth 2.0" and start looking for "Life 2.0." This means broadening our definitions.
We need to invest more in "weird life" research here on Earth. By studying extremophiles—critters that live in battery acid or inside nuclear reactors—we expand our understanding of what life can handle. We also need to get to the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn. Europa and Enceladus have more liquid water than Earth does, tucked away under miles of ice. If we find even a single bacteria-like organism in those oceans, the question is answered. Two different origins in one solar system would mean the universe is teeming with life.
How to track the discovery yourself
If you want to stay on top of this without falling for clickbait "UFO" headlines, you've got to follow the right sources.
- Monitor the JWST Cycle 3 and 4 observation schedules. Look for "Exoplanet Atmosphere" targets. That’s where the real chemistry happens.
- Follow the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. When it comes online fully, it will survey the entire sky every few nights, looking for things that move or change—perfect for catching weird interstellar objects like 'Oumuamua.
- Check the NASA Exoplanet Archive. It’s a live database of every confirmed world outside our solar system. We’re over 5,500 now and counting.
- Read the pre-prints on arXiv.org. Search for "biosignatures" or "technosignatures." This is where the scientists post their papers before they even hit the journals, though be warned: they haven't been peer-reviewed yet, so take them with a grain of salt.
Don't expect a sudden announcement on the evening news. Expect a slow buildup of evidence. A weird gas here, a strange radio pulse there, a "non-natural" heat signature on a distant moon. We are currently in the middle of the greatest detective story in human history, and we’re still just looking for the first clue that sticks.