Scarlett Johansson sex videos: What most people get wrong about the deepfake surge

Scarlett Johansson sex videos: What most people get wrong about the deepfake surge

It feels like every time you open a browser lately, there's some new drama involving a celebrity and a piece of software. Honestly, it’s exhausting. But for Scarlett Johansson, this isn't just "internet drama"—it’s been a decade-long battle against people trying to own her image.

The search for scarlett johansson sex videos is a weirdly persistent part of the web. Most people looking for them are either chasing ghosts of a 2011 phone hack or, more likely these days, falling for AI-generated "deepfakes" that are getting scary-realistic.

The 2011 hack was the original sin

Let’s go back. Way back. Before "deepfake" was even a word in our vocabulary.

In 2011, a guy named Christopher Chaney decided to play digital voyeur. He didn't just target Scarlett; he went after Mila Kunis and Christina Aguilera too. He was basically a "hackerazzi" who guessed security questions to break into email accounts. He found private photos Scarlett had taken for her then-husband, Ryan Reynolds.

He leaked them. It was a mess.

Scarlett didn't just hide, though. She went to the FBI. Eventually, Chaney got slapped with a 10-year prison sentence. It was a landmark case because it treated digital theft with the same weight as a physical break-in. But that leak created a permanent "thirst" in certain corners of the internet, leading to the current obsession with scarlett johansson sex videos. People still think there's more out there. There isn't.

Why you're seeing "new" videos (and why they're fake)

If you see something "new" today, it’s almost certainly AI.

💡 You might also like: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes in 2026

We’ve hit a point in 2026 where "undress apps" and generative video tools are everywhere. These tools take a few seconds of a red carpet interview and overlay a face onto an adult performer’s body. It’s called Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII).

The tech is basically a math equation. It maps the geometry of Scarlett’s face—the way her eyes crinkle or how her jaw moves—and pastes it onto a different video frame by frame.

  • 98% of deepfake videos online are pornographic.
  • 99% of the victims are women.
  • The search for scarlett johansson sex videos is fueled by these AI "slop" factories.

Scarlett has been incredibly vocal about this. She’s famously called it a "black hole" because the internet is too big to police. You take one video down, and ten more pop up on a server in a country that doesn't care about US laws.

The OpenAI "Sky" showdown changed the game

Last year, things got weirdly personal again. OpenAI released a voice for ChatGPT called "Sky."

If you've seen the movie Her, you know Scarlett played an AI named Samantha. When "Sky" launched, everyone—including Scarlett’s own family—thought it was her. Sam Altman even tweeted the word "Her" right before the launch.

Scarlett revealed that Altman had actually asked her to voice the AI months earlier. She said no. Then, they released a voice that sounded almost identical to her anyway.

📖 Related: Addison Rae and The Kid LAROI: What Really Happened

She hired lawyers. OpenAI pulled the voice.

This matters because it proved that celebrities aren't just fighting "videos" anymore. They’re fighting for the right to own their own "persona." If a company can just "approximate" your voice or your face without paying you, what’s left of your career?

The law is finally catching up (Slowly)

For a long time, the law was basically a "shrug." But 2025 and 2026 have seen some actual movement.

  1. The TAKE IT DOWN Act (2025): This federal law finally made it a crime to publish non-consensual deepfakes. It gives victims the power to demand platforms remove the content within 48 hours.
  2. The DEFIANCE Act (2026): Just recently, the Senate passed this, allowing victims to sue the creators and the hosts of these videos for massive statutory damages—up to $250,000 in some cases.
  3. California's AB 621: This specifically targets "undress apps," making it illegal to even create the material, not just share it.

Basically, the "wild west" era of the internet is getting fenced in.

How to spot the fakes

If you’re wondering if a video is real (spoiler: it’s not), look for the "glitches."

AI is good, but it’s not perfect. Look at the edges of the hair where it meets the forehead. Often, it looks blurry or "shimmery." Watch the blinking. Humans blink naturally; AI often forgets to do it or does it at weird intervals. Also, look at the jewelry. AI still struggles to render the way light reflects off a moving necklace or earrings.

👉 See also: Game of Thrones Actors: Where the Cast of Westeros Actually Ended Up

What you should actually do

Honestly, the best thing you can do is stop searching for them.

The search for scarlett johansson sex videos just signals to algorithms that there’s a "market" for this stuff. That market encourages more people to use AI to harass women.

If you stumble across this kind of content, don't share it. Don't link to it. Most platforms now have a specific report button for "Non-consensual sexual content." Use it.

Actionable steps to protect your own digital footprint:

  • Audit your security: Go to your Google or iCloud settings and check your "Security Questions." If the answers are things someone could find on your Facebook (like your high school or your dog's name), change them to something random.
  • Use MFA: Always use Multi-Factor Authentication. A password isn't enough anymore.
  • Support the DEFIANCE Act: If you're in the US, contact your representative. The bill has passed the Senate but needs to become a permanent shield for everyone—not just celebrities.
  • Use Reverse Image Search: If you find a suspicious photo of yourself or a friend, use a tool like PimEyes to see where else it’s appearing online.

The battle over Scarlett’s image is really a battle for everyone's digital consent. If a multimillionaire movie star struggles to keep her own face off these sites, it shows how vulnerable the average person is.

Staying informed about the laws—and the tech—is the only way to stay ahead of the "1,000-foot wave" Scarlett warned us about.