The Crown isn't just about sparkling tiaras and stiff upper lips. It’s also about what happens in the shadows. For centuries, the term abandoned bastard of the royal family wasn't just a cruel insult; it was a political reality that could get you killed or, if you were lucky, merely erased from the history books.
Think about it. We’re obsessed with the line of succession, yet history is littered with kids who had the "right" blood but the "wrong" mother. It's messy. It’s human. And honestly, it’s a lot more common than the palace PR teams would ever want you to believe.
The Brutal Reality of Being Unacknowledged
Back in the day, a king’s "by-blow"—that’s an old-school term for an illegitimate child—could be a major threat. If you were the abandoned bastard of the royal family, you were a walking, talking reminder of a lapse in judgment. Or worse, a potential rival for the throne.
Take Henry VIII. Everyone knows he was desperate for a male heir. He had one, technically, long before Edward VI came along. Henry FitzRoy was his son with his mistress Elizabeth Blount. FitzRoy was "acknowledged," meaning he got titles like the Duke of Richmond. But he was never legalized. He lived in this weird limbo—high-ranking but ultimately disposable. When he died young, the "problem" solved itself. But what about the ones who weren't even given a name?
👉 See also: Why Air Fryer Potatoes and Carrots Are Actually Hard to Get Right
History is usually written by the winners. That means the kids who didn't get a title or a pension simply vanished. They became footnotes. Or, more likely, they became the ancestors of people living in suburban London or rural France today who have no idea they’re carrying Plantagenet or Bourbon DNA.
Why some were kept and others were tossed
It usually came down to the mother’s status. If she was a high-ranking noblewoman, the kid might get a quiet life on a country estate. If she was a chambermaid? Good luck. You were essentially an abandoned bastard of the royal family with zero recourse. You’d be raised as a commoner, perhaps with a mysterious "benefactor" paying for your schooling until you were old enough to work.
The emotional toll is wild to think about. Imagine growing up in a drafty cottage while your father sits in a palace ten miles away, literally being worshipped as a god.
Modern Scandals and DNA Testing
You’d think this would stop in the 20th century. Nope. It just got harder to hide.
Princess Stephanie of Monaco. King Albert II of Belgium. These aren't ancient history. King Albert spent years fighting a legal battle against Delphine Boël. She was his daughter from an affair in the 1960s. For decades, she was the quintessential abandoned bastard of the royal family, at least in the eyes of the law. Albert denied her. He fought the DNA tests.
But science doesn't care about royal prerogative.
In 2020, the Belgian courts finally ruled in her favor. She is now Princess Delphine of Saxe-Coburg. It was a landmark moment because it proved that the "divine right" of kings to ignore their children was officially dead. You can't just ghost your kids when there’s a lab in Brussels that can prove paternity with a cheek swab.
Common Myths About Royal Illegitimacy:
- Myth: They all got "Fitz" names (like Fitzroy).
- Reality: That was mostly a British thing, and even then, only for the ones the King actually liked. Most got nothing.
- Myth: They were always poor.
- Reality: Some were "abandoned" into wealth—given land and told to stay quiet and never, ever come to London.
- Myth: The Church always hated them.
- Reality: The Church often acted as the "clean-up crew," putting these children into monasteries or convents to keep them out of the line of succession.
The Prince Marina Mystery and Forgotten Branches
If you want a real rabbit hole, look into the rumors surrounding the House of Windsor. Every few years, someone pops up claiming to be the abandoned bastard of the royal family from the era of Edward VIII or George V.
👉 See also: Bakers of Milford Menu: What You Should Actually Order (and What to Skip)
Are they all grifters? Probably most of them. But not all.
Consider the case of the "Lost Prince," John. While he wasn't illegitimate, the way the family treated him—hiding him away because of his epilepsy—shows the mindset. If they could do that to a "legitimate" son, what do you think they did to the ones born on the wrong side of the sheets?
The British Royal Family has historically used the "Never Complain, Never Explain" rule to bury these stories. But in the age of Ancestry.com, those skeletons are rattling the closet doors. People are finding "Royal" markers in their DNA and tracing it back to a great-grandmother who worked in the palace kitchens in 1890.
The French Connection
France was actually much more "chill" about this. The French kings had a formal position: the Maîtresse-en-titre. The children of these mistresses were often openly integrated into court life. They weren't "abandoned" in the traditional sense, but they were still barred from the throne.
Louis XIV had dozens of them. He loved them. He gave them the surname "de Bourbon" and married them off to high-ranking nobles. It was a way of expanding his power. In France, being a royal bastard was almost a career path. In England, it was a scandal to be scrubbed.
How to Tell if You’re Part of a "Lost" Royal Line
Okay, let's be real. Most people who think they are a "lost prince" are just looking for a cool story. But if you’re actually researching a potential link to an abandoned bastard of the royal family, here is how the pros (genealogists) actually do it.
- Follow the Money: Royal "abandonment" usually involved a trust fund. Look for unusual payments in old family records or wills from "anonymous donors" or solicitors based in London or the capital city of the country in question.
- Naming Patterns: Royal bastards were often given the mother's maiden name, but sometimes they’d use a variation of the father's title. If your ancestor was "John Earl" and born in a town where the Earl of Something-or-Other had a hunting lodge, that’s a red flag.
- DNA Triangulation: This is the big one. You don't need a sample from the King. You need samples from known descendants of the royal line. If you share a significant, unexplained segment of DNA with a Duke, you might be onto something.
- The "Gaps" in Records: If a birth certificate is missing or clearly altered from a specific period, it’s often a sign that someone was trying to hide a connection.
The Psychological Shadow
Being an abandoned bastard of the royal family isn't just about the money or the title. It’s about the erasure of identity.
Psychologically, these individuals were raised in a vacuum. They were told they were nobody, while their half-siblings were told they were the center of the universe. This creates a weird generational trauma. You see it in the memoirs of people like Marina Ogilvy (though she was legitimate, her rebellion showed the cracks in the facade) or the various claimants to the Romanov throne.
The obsession with "blood purity" is a double-edged sword. It makes the family elite, but it also makes anyone outside that tiny circle an outcast.
Actionable Steps for History Buffs and Genealogists
If you're fascinated by this or think your family tree has some "blue blood" mystery, stop looking for tiaras and start looking for paper trails.
- Check the Royal Archives: While many records are private, many letters from the 18th and 19th centuries have been digitized. Look for "petitions for support."
- Use Y-DNA Testing: If you are male and believe you are descended from a royal male line, a Y-DNA test is much more accurate than a standard autosomal test (like the basic 23andMe). It traces the direct paternal line back thousands of years.
- Read "The Royal Bastards of Medieval England" by Chris Given-Wilson: It’s the gold standard for understanding how this actually worked. It’s not a fairy tale; it’s a textbook on political survival.
- Acknowledge the probability: Statistically, millions of people are descended from royalty. The "abandonment" happened so often that royal DNA is now spread throughout the general population. You’re likely a cousin to a King; you just don’t have the palace keys.
The era of the abandoned bastard of the royal family being a secret is ending. Between the internet and genetic science, the "shadow" children are finally coming into the light. Whether the palaces like it or not, the family tree is much wider than the official version suggests.
Stop looking at the portraits on the wall. The real history is usually hidden in the basement archives and the DNA of "ordinary" people. That's where the real story of power, sex, and survival actually lives.
Next Steps for Your Research:
Start by mapping your family’s location between 1850 and 1920. Cross-reference these locations with royal residences or travel itineraries of the royal family during those years. If a direct ancestor worked in proximity to the court and then suddenly moved to a different region with unexplained wealth, focus your genealogical search on the "Civil List" or private pension records often held in national archives. These documents frequently list payments to individuals for "services rendered," which was often code for maintaining the silence of unacknowledged descendants.