When Ronan Farrow published his massive investigation into Elon Musk in late 2023, the internet basically melted for a second. We’re used to Musk being in the headlines for erratic tweets or space launches. But Farrow’s reporting for The New Yorker wasn’t just another profile of a billionaire. It was a autopsy of how a single civilian ended up holding the keys to global geopolitics.
Honestly, the Ronan Farrow Elon Musk piece—titled "Elon Musk’s Shadow Rule"—paints a picture of a guy who has become an unofficial arm of the U.S. government. That's not hyperbole. From the war in Ukraine to the way your next car might charge, Farrow showed that the Pentagon and NASA are now essentially tethered to Musk’s whims. It’s a weird, unprecedented reality where the state has offloaded its most critical functions to a man who might decide to change the course of a war because he had a "great conversation" with Vladimir Putin.
The Starlink Standoff and the Shadow Rule
The most chilling part of the Ronan Farrow Elon Musk investigation centers on Starlink. You probably remember when the war in Ukraine started and Musk was the hero. He sent thousands of terminals to keep the country online. It was a PR masterstroke. But then things got messy.
✨ Don't miss: abc weather phila pa: What Really Happens Behind the Forecast
Farrow detailed how Musk eventually balked at the cost and the potential for "escalation." He reportedly told Pentagon officials that he could see the "entire war unfolding" through a map of Starlink activity. Imagine being a government official and hearing a private citizen tell you he has a better bird's-eye view of a battlefield than you do.
"Elon desperately wants the world to be saved. But only if he can be the one to save it." — Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, to Ronan Farrow.
This quote basically sums up the central tension. It’s not just about money; it’s about control. Farrow revealed that Colin Kahl, then the under-secretary of defense for policy, had to negotiate with Musk as if he were a sovereign leader. Why? Because the U.S. government had no "Plan B" for satellite internet in a war zone.
👉 See also: Why a Car Caught on Fire Today and How to Survive the Chaos
Why the U.S. Government Is Hooked on Musk
The dependency isn't just a SpaceX problem. It’s everywhere.
- NASA: We literally can't get astronauts to the International Space Station from American soil without SpaceX right now.
- Transportation: The Biden administration had to pivot its entire EV charging strategy to accommodate Tesla’s proprietary technology because they’d already built the most reliable network.
- Energy: Tesla’s battery tech is becoming the backbone of grid stabilization efforts.
It’s a monopoly by default. Farrow argues that decades of privatization have left the American government "hollowed out." When the state stops building things, people like Musk fill the vacuum.
The Ketamine Factor and Erratic Behavior
One of the more "tabloid" but still deeply serious parts of the Ronan Farrow Elon Musk report was the mention of Musk's self-medication. Farrow spoke to associates who suggested Musk’s use of ketamine—which he has publicly defended as a better option than SSRIs for depression—might be contributing to his increasingly chaotic decision-making.
It’s a tough subject. Depression is real. But when the person managing the primary communication tool for the Ukrainian military and the only rocket ship for NASA is allegedly behaving erratically, people get nervous. Farrow didn't just throw this in for clicks; he used it to highlight the lack of "checks and balances." There is no board of directors or government agency that can effectively tell Musk "no" when he decides to, say, disable Starlink near Crimea during a critical offensive.
Science Fiction and the Savior Complex
Farrow spent a lot of time looking at what shaped Musk’s brain. It turns out, it’s a lot of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy and the video game Deus Ex.
📖 Related: Eugene Robinson: Why the Iconic Washington Post Columnist Retired and What He’s Doing Now
Musk sees himself as a protagonist in a sci-fi novel. In that world, the hero doesn't follow bureaucracy. The hero breaks rules to save the species. This mindset explains why he hates regulators like OSHA or the FAA. To Musk, they aren't keeping people safe; they're just "red tape" slowing down the salvation of humanity.
Farrow pointed out a weird irony here: Musk loves these stories that are often critiques of unchecked power and capitalism, yet he seems to view them as a roadmap for how he should run his companies. It's a "main character energy" that has global consequences.
Dealing with the "Shadow Rule"
So, what do we actually do with this information? Farrow’s reporting doesn't offer a simple fix, but it does highlight where the guardrails are missing.
If you are following the Ronan Farrow Elon Musk narrative, here are the real-world takeaways you should keep in mind:
- Diversify your tech: For businesses, the lesson of Starlink is never to rely on a single proprietary provider for mission-critical infrastructure.
- Watch the regulators: Keep an eye on the FAA and SEC. They are currently the only entities even attempting to provide oversight, though they are often outgunned by Musk's legal teams.
- Question the "Hero" Narrative: Recognize that billionaire philanthropy often comes with strings—usually in the form of total control over how that "help" is used.
The reality Farrow uncovered is that Musk isn't just a businessman anymore. He's a geopolitical pivot point. Whether he’s talking to Putin or deciding which journalists get "throttled" on X, his personal moods now have the weight of national policy. That's a lot of power for one guy with a ketamine prescription and a smartphone.
To stay informed on this evolving power dynamic, you should monitor the ongoing GAO (Government Accountability Office) reports regarding SpaceX contracts. These often reveal just how much leverage the government has—or doesn't have—when negotiating with Musk. Additionally, following the legal challenges against X regarding its data-sharing and moderation policies provides a window into how international bodies, like the EU, are attempting to create the "checks" that Farrow noted are currently missing in the U.S.