If you were around in the early 1980s, or if you've ever fallen down a rabbit hole of "Satanic Panic" history, you know the name. Well, you know the book. Mazes and Monsters became the definitive "cautionary tale" of a generation. It turned tabletop gaming into a psychological minefield. But the Mazes and Monsters author, Rona Jaffe, wasn't some basement-dwelling dungeon master or a religious zealot.
She was a glamorous, New York City novelist.
Honestly, Jaffe was already a titan of "chick lit" before she ever touched a twenty-sided die. She wrote The Best of Everything in 1958, a book that basically paved the way for Mad Men and Sex and the City. So how did a woman who specialized in the social dynamics of career girls and Manhattan elite end up writing the most famous anti-RPG novel in history?
The answer is weirder than the fiction. It involves a missing Ivy League student, a massive media misunderstanding, and a young actor named Tom Hanks.
The Tragedy That Inspired the Novel
Rona Jaffe didn't just pull this story out of thin air. She was a professional. She saw a headline and she ran with it. In 1979, a 16-year-old computer prodigy named James Dallas Egbert III disappeared from Michigan State University.
The media went absolutely nuclear.
The private investigator on the case, William Dear, floated a theory that Egbert had gotten lost in the steam tunnels under the university while playing a real-life version of Dungeons & Dragons. It was a perfect storm for a tabloid frenzy. Parents were already terrified of the burgeoning "counter-culture" of nerdiness.
Here’s the thing, though: the D&D theory was mostly a distraction. Egbert’s disappearance was actually tied to immense academic pressure and personal struggles with his mental health and identity. He was found a few weeks later, but the "steam tunnel" narrative had already stuck.
💡 You might also like: Not the Nine O'Clock News: Why the Satirical Giant Still Matters
Jaffe saw this drama and smelled a bestseller. She wrote Mazes and Monsters in a feverish dash, publishing it in 1981. She changed the names, sure. James Egbert became Robbie Wheeling. The game became "Mazes and Monsters." But the core hook remained: a game so immersive it drives a "fragile" mind into a psychotic break.
Why Rona Jaffe Was the Perfect (and Weirdest) Choice
You have to understand who the Mazes and Monsters author really was to get why the book feels the way it does. Rona Jaffe was a graduate of Radcliffe College. She was savvy. She knew how to write "the zeitgeist."
She didn't care about the rules of THAC0. She didn't know the difference between a Paladin and a Ranger. To Jaffe, the game was just a metaphor for the alienation of youth.
Her prose in the book is fascinatingly detached. She writes about the "Great Hall" and the "Level Nine" monsters with a sort of clinical distance, like she's describing a strange cocktail party on the Upper East Side. It’s this lack of "gamer" authenticity that actually made the book more terrifying to parents. Because she didn't treat it like a hobby; she treated it like a cult.
The Tom Hanks Connection
Most people today don't read the book. They watch the 1982 TV movie. It was Tom Hanks’ first leading role.
Think about that. The man who became America’s Dad started out as a kid having a mental breakdown because he thought he was a cleric named Pardu.
Jaffe’s narrative translated perfectly to the small screen because it followed a very specific 80s trope: the "dangerous" new trend. The movie amplified Jaffe’s themes. It took her "disturbed youth" angle and turned it into a full-blown PSA. Jaffe was reportedly quite happy with the success, as it kept her name in the headlines during a decade where her traditional "women's fiction" was being eclipsed by flashier writers like Danielle Steel.
📖 Related: New Movies in Theatre: What Most People Get Wrong About This Month's Picks
The Legacy of the "Anti-Gamer" Narrative
Did Jaffe hate gamers? Probably not. She was a storyteller. She found a hook that worked.
But the impact was real. For years, D&D players had to hide their books. Parents’ groups cited the "events" of the book as if they were documentary evidence. Jaffe, as the Mazes and Monsters author, became an accidental architect of the Satanic Panic.
She tapped into a specific fear: that our children are living in worlds we cannot see or control.
The irony is that Jaffe’s own life was about breaking barriers. She started her own foundation to support female writers. She was a trailblazer for women in publishing. Yet, for a huge segment of the population, she is simply the woman who told the world that rolling dice would lead to a leaf-pile-induced hallucination in Manhattan.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Book
If you actually sit down and read the novel today, it's not quite the "evil game" screed people claim it is.
- It’s actually about trauma. Robbie, the main character, has a massive amount of "mommy and daddy" issues. The game is just the catalyst, not the cause.
- The "Monsters" are internal. Jaffe spends a lot of time on the internal monologues of the four friends. She’s more interested in their failing friendships than the actual game mechanics.
- It’s a New York story. Despite being set at a fictional university (Pequod), the heart of the book is that weird, lonely trek to the Two World Trade Center towers.
Jaffe wasn't trying to ban D&D. She was trying to write a psychological thriller about how easy it is for college kids to lose their grip on reality when they feel unsupported. It just so happened that "Mazes and Monsters" was the trendiest vehicle for that story.
Fact-Checking the Fiction
We should be clear about the James Egbert case versus Jaffe's book.
👉 See also: A Simple Favor Blake Lively: Why Emily Nelson Is Still the Ultimate Screen Mystery
Egbert did not die in a steam tunnel. He did not lose his mind because of a d20. He eventually took his own life a year after his disappearance, a tragedy that had far more to do with the intense pressure of being a child prodigy than with any fantasy game.
William Dear, the investigator, even wrote his own book later called The Dungeon Master, which tried to walk back some of the sensationalism, but the damage was done. Jaffe’s fictionalization was already the "truth" in the minds of the public.
Actionable Insights for Today's Readers
If you're looking into the history of the Mazes and Monsters author or the era of the Satanic Panic, there are a few ways to get the full picture without falling for the 1980s hysteria.
First, read The Best of Everything by Jaffe before you read Mazes and Monsters. It gives you a much better sense of her actual voice and her talent for observing social hierarchies. You’ll realize Mazes and Monsters was a bit of a departure for her, a "work for hire" vibe even if it was her own idea.
Second, check out the documentary Darkon or even the more recent histories of TSR (the company that made D&D). They provide the necessary context for how the gaming community felt under siege during this time.
Third, watch the Tom Hanks movie with a grain of salt. It’s a time capsule. It’s not a documentary. It’s a glimpse into what happens when a sophisticated novelist like Rona Jaffe tries to deconstruct a subculture she doesn't actually belong to.
Ultimately, Rona Jaffe’s career was massive. She shouldn't be defined by a single book about a game she didn't play. But in the world of tabletop history, she remains the most influential outsider to ever roll for initiative.
To truly understand this era, you have to look at the primary sources. Start by comparing the actual police reports of the Egbert case with Jaffe’s chapters. The divergence is where the "art" (and the controversy) lives. You'll find that the "Mazes and Monsters" of the title weren't in the game—they were the sensationalist headlines of the era.
Next Steps for Further Research
- Read the Original Reporting: Look up the 1979 New York Times articles regarding James Dallas Egbert III to see how the "D&D" narrative was built in real-time.
- Analyze the "Satanic Panic" Timeline: Map out the publication of Mazes and Monsters (1981) against the rise of the "Bothered About Dungeons and Dragons" (B.A.D.D.) organization in 1982.
- Literature Comparison: Contrast Jaffe’s treatment of youth subculture with other 80s authors like Jay McInerney to see how the "lost generation" trope was evolving.