It was 2010. The world was watching a gaunt, four-star general who ate once a day, ran seven miles every morning, and seemingly held the entire fate of the war in Afghanistan in his hands.
Then came the "Runaway General" article.
💡 You might also like: Benghazi Attack: What Really Happened on September 11, 2012
When Michael Hastings published his profile in Rolling Stone, the fallout wasn't just a political headache. It was a career-ending earthquake. General Stanley McChrystal, the man who had effectively dismantled Al-Qaeda in Iraq and killed Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was suddenly out of a job. Not because of a tactical failure or a lost battle, but because of a series of candid, booze-fueled comments made in front of a reporter.
The Volcano That Changed Everything
People often forget that this story almost didn't happen. Hastings was only supposed to be with McChrystal's inner circle for a couple of days.
Then Eyjafjallajökull happened.
The Icelandic volcano erupted, spewing a massive ash cloud that grounded flights across Europe. Suddenly, McChrystal and his staff—affectionately (or arrogantly) known as "Team America"—were stuck in Paris and Berlin with a reporter from Rolling Stone.
They got comfortable. Way too comfortable.
In a hotel suite in Paris, as the wine flowed and the pressure of the war felt a world away, the guards came down. Hastings watched as the general’s top aides mocked the very people they were supposed to be working for. They called National Security Advisor James Jones a "clown" who was "stuck in 1985." They joked about Vice President Joe Biden. One aide even did an impression of him, basically calling him a buffoon.
Honestly, the optics were a nightmare.
The Fallout: Why Obama Had to Do It
When the article hit the stands, it wasn’t just the "disrespect" that stung. It was the revelation of a deep, systemic rift between the military leadership and the White House.
You’ve got to understand the context of the time. President Barack Obama was trying to manage a "surge" in Afghanistan while balancing a skeptical public and a restless cabinet. McChrystal was the face of Counterinsurgency (COIN) strategy. He needed the White House's full backing.
But the Rolling Stone general Stanley McChrystal profile made it look like the military was running its own foreign policy. It portrayed a "warrior-scholar" who was increasingly contemptuous of civilian oversight.
McChrystal was summoned back to Washington D.C. He walked into the Oval Office and tendered his resignation. Within hours, he was replaced by General David Petraeus.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Article
There’s a common narrative that Hastings "tricked" the general. Some media critics at the time even accused him of breaking the "unspoken rules" of being an embedded reporter.
But Hastings was clear: everything was on the record.
📖 Related: The Traffic Report San Diego Reality Check: Why Your GPS Is Always Lying to You
- The Tape Recorder: Hastings had it out in plain sight.
- The Access: The staff invited him into their inner sanctum, believing they were untouchable.
- The Content: The insults weren't whispered in dark corners; they were part of the daily banter of a high-stress team that had become a bit too insular.
Interestingly, many rank-and-file soldiers actually liked the article. They were frustrated with the restrictive "rules of engagement" McChrystal had put in place to limit civilian casualties. To them, the article showed a general who was as frustrated with the bureaucracy as they were.
Beyond the Scandal: The McChrystal Legacy
Despite how it ended, you can't talk about modern warfare without talking about what McChrystal actually built.
Before he was the Rolling Stone general, McChrystal was the architect of the "Team of Teams" philosophy. He took the siloed, secretive world of special operations and forced it to share information in real-time. He realized that the old-school hierarchy couldn't move fast enough to beat a networked enemy like Al-Qaeda.
He didn't just command missions; he redesigned the organization.
After his retirement, he didn't just fade away into a quiet life of fishing. He started the McChrystal Group, a consulting firm that teaches Fortune 500 companies how to use those same military principles to survive in the business world. He wrote books like Team of Teams and On Character, turning his massive failure into a masterclass on leadership and accountability.
What We Can Learn from "The Runaway General"
So, what’s the real takeaway here?
📖 Related: Mill Hill County High School: Why This North London State School Stays So Popular
First, transparency is a double-edged sword. McChrystal’s strength was his authenticity and his closeness to his team, but that same "us vs. them" mentality created a blind spot when it came to his bosses.
Second, civilian control of the military is non-negotiable. In a democracy, it doesn't matter how brilliant or successful a general is—they still answer to the people who were elected.
If you want to apply this to your own life or business, here are some actionable steps based on McChrystal’s post-military work:
- Break Down Silos: If your marketing team isn't talking to your product team, you're losing. Force the "shared consciousness" that McChrystal used to win in Iraq.
- Audit Your Inner Circle: Are the people around you telling you what you want to hear, or are they keeping you grounded? "Team America" became a bubble that eventually popped.
- Own the Failure: McChrystal didn't blame the reporter. He didn't sue for libel. He accepted the consequences, retired quietly, and then spent the next decade teaching others how to be better leaders.
The story of the Rolling Stone general Stanley McChrystal is a reminder that even the most disciplined among us can be undone by a moment of indiscretion. But it's also a story of how a person responds when their entire world collapses. He didn't let one article define his entire life, even if it did end his military career.
To truly understand the impact of the "Runaway General" piece, you should look into McChrystal's own writing on his 35-year career. His memoir, My Share of the Task, offers a perspective that the Rolling Stone article never could: the weight of a man trying to win a war that many believed was already lost.