It started with a fifth-place tie and a trophy that didn't go home with her. That moment in 2022, where Riley Gaines stood on a podium next to Lia Thomas, sparked a firestorm that hasn't let up. People have been refreshing their feeds for months, waiting to see if the headline riley gaines wins lawsuit would finally become a permanent reality.
Honestly, the legal world is rarely as clean-cut as a buzzer-beater. If you’re looking for a simple "yes" or "no," you’re going to be disappointed. But if you want the truth about where the money is moving and which judges are actually siding with the swimmers, pull up a chair.
The Ruling That Changed the Game
In late 2025, a federal judge in Georgia, Tiffany Johnson, handed down a decision that both sides immediately claimed as a win. It’s one of those classic legal "split the baby" moments.
Judge Johnson dismissed a huge chunk of the lawsuit. She tossed the constitutional claims, basically saying the NCAA isn't the government, so it can’t technically violate your constitutional rights the same way a state can. She also dismissed claims against the University System of Georgia. Why? Because Georgia had already passed the Riley Gaines Act, making the specific complaints about future events in that state "moot."
But—and this is the "win" part everyone is talking about—she kept the core alive.
The judge ruled that the Title IX claim against the NCAA could move forward. This is huge. For decades, the NCAA has argued it isn’t bound by Title IX because it doesn’t receive federal funding directly. Judge Johnson wasn’t buying it. She allowed "targeted discovery" to see if the NCAA's partnership with the Department of Defense (like those massive concussion studies) counts as federal funding.
If it does? The NCAA's entire legal shield disappears.
📖 Related: Bethany Hamilton and the Shark: What Really Happened That Morning
Why Riley Gaines Wins Lawsuit Talk is Heating Up Now
You’ve probably seen the "Riley Gaines wins lawsuit" victory laps on social media lately. A lot of that stems from a separate but related earthquake in the Department of Education.
Earlier in 2025, a federal court in Kentucky basically nuked the Biden administration's Title IX rewrite. That rewrite would have expanded "sex" to include "gender identity" nationwide. When that was struck down, Gaines called it a "huge win for reality."
Then you have the University of Pennsylvania situation. UPenn basically settled a civil-rights complaint by agreeing to strip Lia Thomas of certain records and reassigning them to the female swimmers who finished behind her. While not a direct result of the Gaines v. NCAA docket, it’s a massive symbolic win for the movement she leads.
The Realities of the Legal Docket
- Case Name: Gaines v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
- Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
- Status: Active and moving toward discovery phase (January 2026)
- The Plaintiffs: 20+ athletes including Gaines, Kylee Alons, and Brooke Slusser
- The Goal: Striking records, damages for "loss of opportunity," and permanent policy bans
The "Privacy" Argument That Didn't Stick
One thing that people get wrong is the locker room issue. In the original filing, the girls talked a lot about the "bodily privacy" violations of sharing space with biological males.
The court actually dismissed those specific privacy claims.
The judge’s logic was pretty cold: because the NCAA is a private association, it doesn't have the same "state actor" obligations as a public school. It’s a technicality that feels like a slap in the face to the athletes, but it’s how the law works right now. This is why the focus has shifted almost entirely to the Title IX financial link.
👉 See also: Simona Halep and the Reality of Tennis Player Breast Reduction
If Gaines and her lawyers (led by William Bock, who famously took down Lance Armstrong) can prove the NCAA takes government money, they can force the organization to follow Title IX's sex-based protections.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Settlement
There’s a massive $2.5 billion NCAA settlement floating around the news (the House v. NCAA case). Don’t confuse the two.
That settlement is about paying athletes for their Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL). It has nothing to do with the transgender participation lawsuit. However, the Gaines team is watching it closely. Why? Because the NCAA is suddenly willing to pay out billions to settle one set of grievances while fighting the female athletes in another.
The Supreme Court Factor
As of January 2026, the Supreme Court is currently hearing arguments in cases from Idaho and West Virginia (B.P.J. v. West Virginia Board of Education).
These cases are the "north star" for the Riley Gaines lawsuit. If the Supreme Court rules that states can ban biological males from female sports based on the 14th Amendment, the NCAA’s defense in the Gaines case will basically evaporate.
Justice Kavanaugh and the conservative wing have already signaled they're skeptical of "gender identity" trumping biological sex in competitive sports.
✨ Don't miss: NFL Pick 'em Predictions: Why You're Probably Overthinking the Divisional Round
Actionable Insights for the Future of Women's Sports
This isn't just a "celebrity" lawsuit. It's changing how sports are run at the local level. Here is what's actually happening on the ground because of these legal battles:
1. The "Riley Gaines Act" is Spreading
Georgia and several other states have passed versions of this law. If you’re a coach or an AD, you need to check if your state now requires biology-based rosters. It's no longer just an NCAA "recommendation"—it's often the law of the land.
2. Record Books are Becoming Fluid
Following the UPenn settlement, we’re seeing a trend where schools are preemptively "correcting" records. If a transgender athlete's win is under legal cloud, some institutions are moving toward dual-record keeping or "biological-sex" categories to avoid future litigation.
3. Title IX Compliance is Getting a Reality Check
Schools are being told to prepare for the "funding" trap. If your athletic department uses any federal grants for research, you might be subject to the stricter, sex-based interpretations of Title IX currently being upheld by the courts.
The fight isn't over. Not by a long shot. But the momentum has clearly shifted. The phrase "riley gaines wins lawsuit" might not be a single final judgment yet, but the series of smaller court victories is building a wall that the NCAA is finding harder and harder to climb over.
Keep an eye on the January 2026 discovery deadline. That’s when the NCAA has to open its books and show where every dollar of that Department of Defense money went. That will be the moment we know if the "win" is a knockout or just a points decision.
Next Steps for Staying Informed:
- Monitor the Northern District of Georgia court records for the "Joint Discovery Plan" due this month.
- Check your local high school athletic association's updated Title IX handbook, as many were revised following the January 2025 federal court rulings.
- Watch for the Supreme Court's final decision on the Idaho and West Virginia cases, expected by June 2026, which will set the binding precedent for Gaines' remaining claims.