History isn't a dead thing. Most people think of Richard III as that hunchbacked villain from Shakespeare who offered his kingdom for a horse, but the reality is much messier, weirder, and—honestly—way more interesting. For five centuries, he was the ultimate bogeyman of English history. Then, in 2012, a team of archaeologists found his bones under a "Reserved" parking space in Leicester.
Everything changed.
The discovery didn't just give us a skeleton; it forced us to look at the last Plantagenet king through a lens that wasn't tinted by Tudor propaganda. We found a man with severe scoliosis, but no "withered arm." We found a warrior who died a brutal, terrifying death at the Battle of Bosworth Field. Mostly, we found that what we think we know about Richard III is often a mix of political spin and 16th-century theater.
The Monster vs. The Man
If you ask a random person about Richard III, they'll probably mention the Princes in the Tower. It's the big one. Did he murder his nephews, Edward V and Richard of Shrewsbury, to clear his path to the throne?
Maybe.
The truth is, there is no "smoking gun." No death warrants exist. No contemporary eye-witness accounts confirm their murder. What we do know is that after Richard took the throne in 1483, the boys disappeared from public view. By the time Henry Tudor (Henry VII) took over, the rumor that Richard had smothered them was already baked into the narrative. It’s important to remember that history is written by the winners, and the Tudors were very, very good at branding.
Phillipa Langley, the woman who basically willed the 2012 excavation into existence, has spent years arguing for a "rehabilitation" of his image. She’s part of the Richard III Society, a group that believes he was actually a pretty decent administrator. They point to things like the "Presumption of Innocence" and the fact that he was the first king to ensure legal statutes were written in English so the common people could actually understand the law.
He wasn't just a usurper; he was a reformer.
The Spine and the Science
When the University of Leicester team, including lead archaeologist Richard Buckley and osteologist Jo Appleby, first looked at the remains, the spine was the giveaway. It had a distinct S-curve.
This was idiopathic adolescent onset scoliosis.
It wasn't a "hunchback" in the way we see in the movies. His right shoulder would have been higher than his left, and his torso would have looked short compared to his limbs, but with a good tailor? You might not have even noticed it. The science debunked the idea that he was some physically deformed "monster" from birth. Instead, it showed a man who likely dealt with significant physical discomfort while still leading charges on a battlefield.
What Happened at Bosworth?
August 22, 1485. The end of the Middle Ages in England, basically. Richard III didn't die hiding. He died fighting.
The analysis of his bones tells a gruesome story. He sustained eleven wounds at or near the time of death, nine of them to the skull. This suggests he lost his helmet or had it knocked off. One massive wound to the base of the skull was likely the fatal blow—a halberd or sword driven upward into the brain. It was a chaotic, messy end to a two-year reign.
The King's death marked the end of the Wars of the Roses. When Henry Tudor picked up the crown (literally, if you believe the legends about it being found in a hawthorn bush), the Plantagenet dynasty was over.
The DNA Drama
The identification of the remains was a masterclass in modern science. Dr. Turi King and her team used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to link the skeleton to living descendants of Richard’s sister, Anne of York. Specifically, a Canadian-born cabinet maker named Michael Ibsen and a man named Wendy Duldig.
It matched.
But science always leaves a little room for mystery. The Y-chromosome (the male line) didn't match the modern descendants of the Dukes of Beaufort. This means there was a "break" in the male line—an illegitimate child somewhere in the family tree. It doesn't mean the skeleton isn't Richard, because the maternal DNA is rock solid. It just means the British aristocracy has some skeletons in the closet that have nothing to do with Richard.
Why Richard III Matters Now
Why do we care about a guy who died over 540 years ago?
Because Richard III represents the struggle for truth. He is the ultimate "Rorschach test" of history. If you like a tragic villain, he’s your guy. If you like an underdog fighting a smear campaign, he’s also your guy.
👉 See also: Why Elegant Wedding Gowns with Sleeves are the Only Choice for 2026 Brides
His reinterment at Leicester Cathedral in 2015 was a massive global event. Thousands of people lined the streets. It wasn't just about a king; it was about the fact that we can actually solve "cold cases" from the 15th century. It gave people a sense that history isn't just something written in dusty books—it's physically under our feet, waiting to be dug up.
Common Myths vs. Reality
- The Hunchback: Wrong. It was scoliosis, not a kyphosis (hunch).
- The Withered Arm: Pure Shakespearean fiction. His arm bones were perfectly normal.
- The Princes in the Tower: Unsolved. No evidence confirms his guilt or his innocence.
- "A Horse! My Kingdom for a Horse!": He actually died fighting on foot after his horse got bogged down in the marshy ground.
The real Richard was likely a man of his time: pious, somewhat paranoid, a capable soldier, and a man who lived through the most unstable period of English politics. He wasn't a saint. He was a survivor until he wasn't.
How to Explore the History Yourself
If you’re genuinely interested in the "Ricardian" debate, you shouldn't just take one person's word for it. History is about looking at the primary sources and deciding for yourself.
Start by visiting the King Richard III Visitor Centre in Leicester. It's built right over the spot where he was found. You can see the glass floor looking down into the empty grave. It’s eerie.
Read the contemporary accounts like the Croyland Chronicle. It’s one of the few sources written during his actual lifetime, though the author remains anonymous and clearly had some biases.
Check out the work of Dr. John Ashdown-Hill. He was the historian who tracked down the DNA lineage that made the identification possible. His book, The Last Days of Richard III, is a great place to start if you want the gritty details of the Bosworth campaign.
Next, look into the Princes in the Tower project. Led by Philippa Langley, this recent research initiative is looking into European archives to see if the princes actually escaped to the continent. Some evidence suggests they might have lived under assumed names.
Finally, go see a production of Shakespeare’s Richard III. Just remember that you’re watching a 400-year-old version of a Netflix political thriller, not a documentary. Appreciate the drama, but keep the facts in your back pocket.
The story of Richard III is far from over. As long as there are archives to search and ground to dig, we might still find the final pieces of the puzzle. History is always waiting for the next shovel to hit the dirt.
Actionable Insights for History Enthusiasts:
- Analyze the Sources: When reading about the Princes in the Tower, distinguish between "contemporary" (written at the time) and "Tudor" (written decades later) sources.
- Visit the Sites: Map out a "Richard III Trail" starting from Middleham Castle in Yorkshire (his favorite home) to Bosworth Battlefield and ending at Leicester Cathedral.
- Engage with Science: Read the University of Leicester's published papers on the skeletal analysis to understand how forensic pathology changes our view of historical figures.
- Stay Updated: Follow the "Missing Princes Project" for the latest updates on the search for the fate of Edward V and his brother.