When you think about the Rams vs Patriots Super Bowl rivalry, you're basically looking at the bookends of the greatest dynasty in NFL history. It’s wild. Two games, 17 years apart, involving the exact same head coach and quarterback for one side, but two completely different worlds for the other.
Most fans remember the highlights. They remember Adam Vinatieri pointing his finger in the air in New Orleans or Julian Edelman catching everything in sight in Atlanta. But if you actually dig into the play-by-play, these games weren't just about New England winning. They were about the total destruction of "invincible" offensive systems.
The Night the Greatest Show on Turf Died
Super Bowl XXXVI was never supposed to be close. Honestly, the St. Louis Rams were 14-point favorites. Think about that. In the modern era, a two-touchdown spread in the Super Bowl is unheard of. Kurt Warner had Marshall Faulk, Isaac Bruce, and Torry Holt. They were "The Greatest Show on Turf."
The Patriots? They had a kid named Tom Brady who wasn't even supposed to be playing.
Everyone says Brady won that game. Well, he won the end of it. But Bill Belichick’s defense won the game. They bullied the Rams. They hit Marshall Faulk on every single play—whether he had the ball or not. It was legal back then, and it rattled them.
The Rams actually outgained the Patriots by 160 yards. 427 to 267. That’s a massive gap. Usually, if you outgain someone by that much, you win by three scores. But New England forced three turnovers. Ty Law's pick-six wasn't just a play; it was a statement.
Why the 2002 Upset Still Matters
- The "Team" Introduction: The Patriots refused to be introduced individually. They ran out as a team. It sounds cheesy now, but in a post-9/11 world, it changed how the NFL marketed the Super Bowl.
- The Last Drive: With 1:21 left and no timeouts, John Madden—the legendary broadcaster—literally said on air that the Patriots should just play for overtime. Brady didn't. He hit J.R. Redmond three times, then Troy Brown, then Jermaine Wiggins.
- The Kick: Vinatieri’s 48-yarder as time expired. It was the first time a Super Bowl was won on the final play.
Fast Forward: The Boring Masterpiece of 2019
If Super Bowl XXXVI was a shocking thriller, Super Bowl LIII was a defensive grindhouse. It’s funny because history sort of repeated itself. Again, the Rams had a high-flying offense led by a young genius, Sean McVay. Again, they averaged over 32 points a game.
And again, they ran into the Belichick buzzsaw.
This was the lowest-scoring Super Bowl ever. 13-3. If you like punting, this was your Super Bowl. Johnny Hekker for the Rams set a record with a 65-yard punt. That’s how the game went.
People call it "boring," but if you look at the X’s and O’s, it was fascinating. The Rams' offense was built on "11 personnel" (one back, one tight end). They did the same thing every play to trick you. Belichick and Brian Flores basically told their defense to switch looks the second McVay’s headset cut off (at the 15-second mark on the play clock). Jared Goff looked like a deer in headlights because he couldn't hear his coach anymore.
The Turning Point in Atlanta
It was 3-3 in the fourth quarter. Total deadlock. Then, Brady found Rob Gronkowski for a 29-yard gain down to the 2-yard line. It was the "old reliable" play. Sony Michel punched it in for the only touchdown of the game.
The real dagger, though? Stephon Gilmore picking off Goff in the red zone with about four minutes left. The Rams had a chance to tie it, but Goff hurried a throw under pressure. Game over.
Common Misconceptions About These Games
You’ll hear a lot of "what ifs" when people talk about the Rams vs Patriots Super Bowl history.
One of the biggest is the "Spygate" myth regarding the 2002 game. For years, people claimed the Patriots filmed the Rams’ walkthrough. The Boston Herald actually retracted that story years later because it wasn't true. They never filmed the walkthrough. They won because they hit harder and Mike Martz (the Rams' coach) forgot to run the ball.
Another one? That Todd Gurley was just "rested" in Super Bowl LIII. He wasn't. His knee was shot. The Rams' offense relied on his ability to make defenders miss in the "stretch" run game, and without a healthy Gurley, the whole system collapsed.
What This Rivalry Taught the NFL
These two games prove that in the Super Bowl, the "better" offense rarely beats the "smarter" defense.
Kurt Warner was the MVP. Jared Goff was a Pro Bowler. Both were held to 17 and 3 points respectively by the same guy in a cut-off hoodie. It's a reminder that regular-season stats are great for fantasy football, but post-season football is about physical
intimidation and late-game execution.
Actionable Insights for Fans and Analysts:
- Watch the 15-second mark: If you ever re-watch Super Bowl LIII, watch the Rams' offensive line. They look at the sidelines until the radio cuts out. That's where they lost the game.
- Contextualize the "GOAT": Brady's stats in these two games weren't "video game" numbers. He threw for 145 yards in the first one and 262 in the second (with an interception). He didn't win by being flashy; he won by not blinking.
- Respect the Kicker: Without Adam Vinatieri and Stephen Gostkowski (who hit two crucial field goals in 2019), the Patriots dynasty might have ended with zero rings against the Rams instead of two.
The Rams eventually got their revenge by winning a Super Bowl in their own stadium against the Bengals a few years later, but the scar tissue from New England remains a massive part of their franchise history.
💡 You might also like: Super Bowl 2025 Teams: What Really Happened in New Orleans
To truly understand how the Patriots' dynasty was built and how it eventually ended, you have to look at these two games. They are the mirror images of the same philosophy: outwork, outthink, and outlast.