Puttin' on the Ritz: The Song That Survived Controversy, Tap Dancing, and a 50-Year Identity Crisis

Puttin' on the Ritz: The Song That Survived Controversy, Tap Dancing, and a 50-Year Identity Crisis

You’ve heard the synthesizer riff. You’ve likely seen the black-and-white clip of a man in a top hat literally dancing with his own shadow. Or, if you’re a child of the eighties, you remember a guy in a tuxedo with a slightly unnerving, high-pitched vocal delivery that dominated MTV.

The Puttin' on the Ritz song is one of those rare pieces of media that exists in three different centuries and somehow feels at home in all of them. It’s a survivor. Written by Irving Berlin in 1927 and published in 1929, it has been a jazz standard, a swing anthem, a synth-pop weirdo-hit, and a comedic punchline.

But there is a darker, much more complicated side to the song that most people ignore. It wasn't always about high fashion and "spiffing" yourself up for a night on the town. In fact, the original lyrics were so racially charged that Berlin himself had to rewrite them decades later to keep the song from being buried by history.

The Irving Berlin Origin Story You Weren't Taught

Irving Berlin was a genius, but he was also a businessman. When he wrote the Puttin' on the Ritz song, he was looking to capture the "rhythm of the city." The title itself comes from a slang phrase of the era. To "put on the Ritz" meant to dress like the wealthy patrons of the Ritz-Carlton hotels. It was about aspirational vanity.

In the original 1930 film Puttin' on the Ritz, starring Harry Richman, the song had a very different target.

The initial lyrics mocked the "flashing chimes and golden dimes" of Harlemites who dressed up in expensive clothes they supposedly couldn't afford. It was a song about "Lenox Avenue" and "Lulu Belle." It was, quite frankly, a white songwriter’s caricature of Black high society in 1920s New York.

By the time Fred Astaire got his hands on it for the 1946 film Blue Skies, the world had changed. The Civil Rights movement wasn't in full swing yet, but the blatant stereotypes of the 1920s were starting to feel "off" even to mainstream audiences. Berlin, ever the pragmatist, swapped out the lyrics. He moved the setting from Harlem to Park Avenue. He changed the subjects from "high browns" to "Gary Coopers."

He saved the song's commercial viability by whitewashing its origins. That's the version we know today.

🔗 Read more: Jack Blocker American Idol Journey: What Most People Get Wrong

Why Fred Astaire’s Version Is Actually a Math Problem

If you watch the 1946 performance in Blue Skies, you aren't just watching a guy dance. You’re watching a technical marvel that took five weeks to film.

Astaire was a perfectionist. He wanted to perform the Puttin' on the Ritz song with a "tap ensemble," but he wanted to be the entire ensemble himself. This was before digital compositing. They had to use a process called "rear projection" and painstaking choreography to ensure that the nine Fred Astaires on screen didn't overlap or miss a beat.

The rhythm is weird. It’s a syncopated mess that shouldn't work.

Musicians call this "cross-rhythm." The melody is written in 4/4 time, but the phrasing of the lyrics often feels like it's pushing against that structure. It creates this feeling of forward momentum, like a person strutting down a sidewalk and occasionally tripping but making it look like a dance move. Astaire leaned into this. He used the cane not just as a prop, but as a percussive instrument that filled the gaps between Berlin’s jagged notes.

Honestly, it’s a bit stressful to watch if you’re a musician. You keep waiting for him to fall out of time. He never does.

The Taco Version: The 1982 Weirdness

Fast forward to 1982. A Dutch-born Indonesian singer named Taco (yes, just Taco) decided the world needed a synth-pop cover of a fifty-year-old show tune.

It was a global smash. It hit number four on the Billboard Hot 100.

💡 You might also like: Why American Beauty by the Grateful Dead is Still the Gold Standard of Americana

It was also incredibly bizarre. Taco’s version of the Puttin' on the Ritz song featured a heavy, mechanical beat and a music video that actually got him into quite a bit of trouble. The original video included actors in blackface—a "tribute" to the song's 1920s origins that was rightfully slammed as offensive and tone-deaf even in the eighties. Most modern versions of the video have been edited to remove those scenes, but it remains a weirdly dark footnote in the song's pop-culture journey.

Why did it work? Probably because the early 80s loved a "glam" aesthetic. The idea of dressing up in top hats and tails fit perfectly with the New Romantic movement. It was irony before people knew how to label it.

The Young Frankenstein Effect

You can't talk about this song without mentioning Mel Brooks.

In Young Frankenstein (1974), Gene Wilder and Peter Boyle (as the Monster) perform a soft-shoe routine to the song. It is arguably the most famous scene in the movie. The joke is simple: the ultra-refined, sophisticated lyrics of Irving Berlin being shouted by a groaning, uncoordinated monster in platform shoes.

  • "Puttin' on the riiiiiiiiitz!" *

It humanized the monster. It also cemented the song as a piece of "public domain" consciousness. Even if you’ve never seen a Fred Astaire movie, you know the song because of the Monster. This version stripped away the Park Avenue elitism and turned it into a slapstick anthem for the underdog.

The Structure of a Standard

What makes it stick? It’s the "AABA" structure, mostly. But it’s also the internal rhymes.

  • "Dressed up like a million-dollar trouper / Tryin' hard to look like Gary Cooper (super-duper)" *

It’s catchy. It’s pretentious. It’s fun to sing because it makes you feel like you’re part of an inner circle of "well-to-dos," even if you’re just listening to it in your sweatpants while doing dishes.

📖 Related: Why October London Make Me Wanna Is the Soul Revival We Actually Needed

But we have to acknowledge that the song is a mask. From its 1929 roots to the 1946 rewrite to the 1982 synth explosion, it has always been about "acting" like something you aren't. It’s a song about performance.

The Enduring Legacy and What to Listen For

Today, the Puttin' on the Ritz song is a staple for swing bands and high school jazz ensembles. But if you want to actually "understand" the track, you have to listen to the different versions back-to-back.

Start with the Harry Richman 1930 version. It’s fast, tinny, and slightly uncomfortable because of the lyrics. Then move to the 1946 Astaire version. Notice how the "swing" has been smoothed out into something more "Hollywood." Finally, listen to Taco. The soul is gone, replaced by a drum machine, but the melody is so strong it doesn't matter.

It’s a masterclass in how a single piece of intellectual property can be bent, broken, and rebuilt to fit the morality and fashion of whatever decade it happens to be in.

How to Appreciate the Song Today

If you're a fan of music history or just want to win a trivia night, here is the actionable way to engage with this classic:

  1. Compare the lyrics: Look up the 1929 sheet music versus the 1946 rewrite. It is a startling lesson in how American culture shifted its view on race and class in less than twenty years.
  2. Watch the "Blue Skies" choreography: Don't just watch Fred. Look at the shadows. The synchronization required to film that without CGI is mind-blowing.
  3. Check out the covers: Everyone from Robbie Williams to Gregory Porter has covered it. Porter’s version, in particular, brings back a soulful, jazz-heavy influence that feels like a nod to the song's complicated roots in Harlem.
  4. Listen for the "Vamp": The opening chords are iconic. They signal "showtime" in a way few other songs do.

The Puttin' on the Ritz song isn't just a catchy tune. It’s a historical document. It carries the weight of 1920s prejudices, 1940s glamour, and 1980s kitsch. It’s a bit messy, a bit controversial, and entirely unforgettable. Whether you love it for the tap dancing or the synth-pop beat, you're participating in a century-long conversation about what it means to "put on an act."