It’s a gross violation. That’s the simplest way to put it, honestly. You’re walking up a flight of stairs or standing on a crowded subway train, minding your own business, and someone decides your privacy doesn’t matter. For years, the legal system struggled to keep up with the rise of public up skirt photos, often leaving victims with no recourse because of ancient loopholes in "expectation of privacy" laws.
It's frustrating.
Basically, many old laws were written before everyone had a high-definition camera in their pocket. If you were in a "public place," some courts actually argued that you couldn't expect privacy. Thankfully, that backwards logic is dying out. From the UK’s Voyeurism Act to specific state statutes in the US, the world is finally admitting that taking a photo up someone’s skirt is a crime, regardless of whether they are standing in a park or their own living room.
The Massive Loophole That Protected Perverts
For a long time, the legal hurdle was the definition of "public." In 2014, a massive case in Massachusetts (Commonwealth v. Robertson) shocked the country. The state's highest court ruled that a man who took public up skirt photos of women on the MBTA hadn't technically broken the law because the victims weren't "nude" or "partially nude" under the specific wording of the existing prowling statutes.
People were rightfully pissed.
The court basically said that because the women were in a public place where they could be seen by anyone, they didn't have a "reasonable expectation of privacy." It felt like a slap in the face. It shouldn't matter if you're at the mall; your underwear isn't public property. Within days of that ruling, the Massachusetts legislature scrambled to pass a new law specifically banning the practice. This "patchwork" approach to legislation is why your rights vary so much depending on where you're standing.
Why "Upskirting" Became a Specific Legal Term
The term "upskirting" isn't just internet slang anymore; it’s a legal classification. Gina Martin, an activist in the UK, changed everything after she was targeted at a music festival. She found out that the police couldn't really do anything because it wasn't a specific sexual offense in England and Wales. She didn't just sit there. She spent eighteen months campaigning, and in 2019, the Voyeurism (Offences) Act was passed.
It made taking public up skirt photos a specific crime punishable by up to two years in prison.
🔗 Read more: January 6th Explained: Why This Date Still Defines American Politics
This was a turning point. It moved the conversation away from "was she in public?" to "was there consent?" That’s the nuance that matters. Consent is the line. If you don't have it, you're a predator, not a "photographer."
The Tech Behind the Crime: It’s Not Just Phones Anymore
We have to talk about the hardware. It's getting creepier. While most people think of a guy holding a smartphone at a weird angle, the reality is often more surreptitious. We’re seeing "spy cameras" disguised as shoes, water bottles, and even pens.
Technology moves fast. Laws move slow.
- Shoe-mounted cameras: These are exactly what they sound like. Tiny pinhole lenses embedded in the toe of a sneaker.
- Modified GoPros: Often hidden in bags or satchels left on the floor in crowded areas.
- Fiber optic lenses: Extremely thin cables that can be snaked through gaps in bleachers or stairs.
This isn't just some "lone weirdo" thing, either. There are entire dark-web communities and even some surprisingly mainstream "fetish" forums where these images are traded like currency. The monetization of non-consensual imagery is a billion-dollar problem.
What the Law Says Right Now (State by State)
In the US, it's a mess. Honestly, it's a "know before you go" situation, which is pathetic for a developed nation.
Texas has a "Relationship Privacy Act." California uses its "Invasion of Privacy" statutes. In New York, it’s a felony under Stephanie’s Law—named after a woman who discovered her landlord had filmed her. The common thread in these successful laws is that they focus on the "intimate areas" of the body, regardless of whether the person is clothed.
If you are in a state that hasn't updated its "Peeping Tom" laws since 1970, a prosecutor might have to try and shoehorn the crime into a "disorderly conduct" charge. That's usually just a fine. A literal slap on the wrist for something that can traumatize a victim for years.
💡 You might also like: Is there a bank holiday today? Why your local branch might be closed on January 12
The Psychological Impact: It's Not "Just a Photo"
Psychologists who work with victims of non-consensual image sharing—which is the academic term for things like public up skirt photos—often see symptoms similar to those of physical assault. There's a profound sense of "loss of safety" in public spaces.
Imagine not being able to walk up an escalator without looking over your shoulder.
Dr. Nicola Henry, a lead researcher on image-based sexual abuse, notes that the "permanence" of the internet adds a layer of horror. Once that photo is uploaded, it could be there forever. The victim doesn't just feel violated in the moment; they feel violated every time they think about some stranger on the other side of the world looking at their body.
How to Protect Yourself and What to Do if it Happens
You shouldn't have to be a detective just to wear a dress in public. But since the world is what it is, knowing the signs helps.
- Watch for "The Lean": People taking these photos often stand closer than social norms dictate, usually with their phone held low or resting on a bag.
- Trust your gut: If someone is acting weird behind you on an escalator, move.
- Don't delete the evidence: If you catch someone, your instinct might be to grab their phone and smash it or delete the photo. Don't. You need that for the police.
- Find witnesses: If it happens in a store or mall, tell security immediately. They have their own cameras that might have caught the perpetrator in the act.
Most people don't realize that "disrupting the peace" can be a secondary charge if the specific voyeurism laws are weak in your area. Use every tool available.
The Role of Big Tech and Social Media Platforms
Google and Bing have gotten better at de-indexing certain search terms, but they’re playing whack-a-mole. Every time a site gets shut down, three more pop up with "mirror" URLs.
Moderation is failing.
📖 Related: Is Pope Leo Homophobic? What Most People Get Wrong
AI-powered image recognition should be able to flag these photos instantly, but the "context" is hard for machines. Is it a photo of someone sitting at a park, or is it a targeted up-skirt shot? Human moderators are often the ones who have to make the call, and they are overworked and traumatized by the sheer volume of garbage they have to sift through daily.
Is Privacy Even Possible Anymore?
Some skeptics argue that in an era of facial recognition and "always-on" surveillance, expecting privacy in public is a pipe dream. That’s a dangerous path to go down. Privacy isn't an "all or nothing" deal. Just because a security camera records me walking into a grocery store doesn't mean I've consented to someone taking a photo of my underwear.
We need to maintain these boundaries. If we don't, the "public square" becomes a place where only those who can afford to be "hidden" feel safe.
Moving Forward: Actionable Steps for Change
If you want to actually do something about this, it starts with local legislation.
Check your state’s specific laws on voyeurism. If they don't explicitly mention "clothed" or "partially clothed" victims in "public spaces," they are outdated. Write to your local representative. Mention the Massachusetts Robertson case as a reason why "expectation of privacy" needs to be redefined to include the space beneath a person's clothing.
Support organizations like the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI). They provide resources for victims and work directly with tech companies to help remove non-consensual images from the web.
Steps to take if you are a victim:
- Report to the platform: If you find a photo of yourself online, use the "report" function specifically for non-consensual sexual imagery. This is often prioritized over generic harassment.
- Google's Removal Tool: You can request that Google remove "non-consensual explicit personal images" from their search results via their official help page.
- Contact Law Enforcement: Even if you think they won't do anything, getting a police report on file is crucial for legal removals and potential civil lawsuits later.
The fight against public up skirt photos is about more than just a camera angle. It’s about the fundamental right to exist in the world without being turned into an object for someone else’s gratification. It's about dignity. And it's high time the law started treating it that way.