Ever wonder who actually runs the show in Amman? Honestly, if you look at the news, it’s all about the King. But the prime ministers of Jordan are the ones catching the heat when the price of bread goes up or the water runs dry. It’s a tough gig. Probably one of the hardest in the Middle East.
You’ve got a revolving door of leaders—44 different people since 1921—and most don't last more than a couple of years.
The Role is Kinda Complicated
Technically, the Prime Minister is the head of government. But let’s be real: they serve at the pleasure of the King. Under the Jordanian Constitution, King Abdullah II (and his father King Hussein before him) picks the PM, dismisses them, and signs off on their cabinet.
It’s not like the UK or Canada where the winner of an election just takes the seat. In Jordan, the PM is often a technocrat or a tribal heavyweight brought in to solve a specific crisis. If the people start protesting in the streets over taxes, the King usually dissolves the government, the PM resigns, and a new face comes in to calm things down. It’s a political safety valve.
The current guy in the hot seat is Jafar Hassan. He took over in September 2024, following the departure of Bisher Khasawneh. Hassan is a Harvard-educated technocrat who used to run the King’s office. He’s basically there to fix the economy and navigate the massive regional tension caused by the war in Gaza.
Why Some Names Still Matter Today
Most people can't name ten past prime ministers, but a few names are legendary. Or controversial.
Wasfi Tal is the big one. He was assassinated in Cairo in 1971 by the Black September group. To many Jordanians, especially the "East Bankers" (those of tribal Jordanian descent), he’s a national hero. He was a tough, no-nonsense guy who helped the monarchy survive the civil war in 1970. You still see his picture in shops and on car stickers today.
Then you have Tawfik Abu Al-Huda. He holds the record. The man served as Prime Minister twelve different times between the 1930s and the 1950s. Twelve. Imagine quitting and being called back that many times. It shows how much the early monarchy relied on a tiny circle of trusted advisors to keep the wheels from falling off.
✨ Don't miss: NY Regents Chemistry: Why Students Actually Struggle and How to Pass
The Lone Exception: Suleiman Nabulsi
There was this one time in 1956 when Jordan tried something totally different. Suleiman Nabulsi became the first (and only) Prime Minister to lead a parliamentary government. He was a leftist, a pan-Arabist, and he wasn't exactly on the same page as King Hussein.
It didn't last.
Within months, the relationship soured, the government was dismissed, and the country went into a long period of martial law. Since then, the "Nabulsi experiment" has been a cautionary tale for those pushing for a fully elected executive branch.
The Modern Struggle: Debt and Gaza
Why is the job so hard right now? Two words: Money and Borders.
👉 See also: Maura Murray and Bill Rausch: What Most People Get Wrong
Jordan doesn't have oil. It has phosphate and a lot of sand. Because of that, the prime ministers of Jordan are constantly begging for aid or negotiating with the IMF. When Hani al-Mulki tried to hike taxes in 2018, massive protests broke out. He was gone within days.
The new guy, Jafar Hassan, is dealing with:
- Public Debt: It’s over $50 billion.
- Unemployment: Especially among young people, it’s brutal.
- Regional Chaos: With Gaza next door and a massive refugee population, the PM has to balance the public's anger with the country's strategic need to keep its peace treaty with Israel and its alliance with the US.
It’s a balancing act that usually ends in a resignation letter.
What Most People Get Wrong
A lot of Western analysts think the Prime Minister is just a puppet. That’s a bit of an oversimplification. While the King holds the ultimate power, the Prime Ministry (the Riyasat) is where the actual policy happens. They write the laws, manage the ministries, and deal with the tribal leaders who keep the country stable.
If a PM is smart, they can actually shift the country’s direction. Omar Razzaz, for example, tried to push a "Social Contract" to modernize the state, even if the old-school conservative establishment fought him every step of the way.
Actionable Insights for Following Jordanian Politics
If you’re trying to keep up with what’s happening in Amman, don’t just look at the royal decrees.
- Watch the Letter of Designation: When the King appoints a new PM, he sends a long letter. It’s not just fluff. It’s the actual "to-do" list for the next year. If it focuses on "administrative reform," expect a lot of government employees to get fired or moved.
- Check the Cabinet Mix: Look at how many "technocrats" (PhDs and bankers) are in the cabinet versus "tribal" figures. If it’s mostly technocrats, the goal is fixing the economy. If it’s tribal, the goal is internal stability.
- The 100-Day Rule: Most Jordanian governments get a "honeymoon" of about 100 days. After that, the honeymoon is over, and the Parliament starts the grilling.
Jordan’s political system is a unique beast. It’s a mix of ancient tribal loyalties and modern bureaucratic struggle. The prime ministers of Jordan are the ones caught in the middle, trying to keep a small, resource-poor country stable in the middle of a literal war zone.
To really understand Jordan, you have to watch the men (it’s always been men, so far) who sit in the Prime Ministry. They are the shock absorbers of the state. When they fail, the system feels the hit. When they succeed, the King gets the credit. It’s a thankless job, but someone has to do it.
To keep track of current developments, monitor the official news releases from the Jordan News Agency (Petra) or the Royal Hashemite Court. They provide the most direct updates on cabinet reshuffles and legislative priorities.