President Trump Calls For Termination Of Fed Chairman Powell: What Really Happened

President Trump Calls For Termination Of Fed Chairman Powell: What Really Happened

The tension between the White House and the Federal Reserve has finally hit a breaking point. Honestly, we all saw it coming, but the speed of the escalation has caught even veteran D.C. watchers off guard. Recently, President Trump calls for termination of Fed Chairman Powell have shifted from mere social media rants to a full-blown legal and political siege.

It’s a mess.

Basically, the President is furious about interest rates. He wants them at rock bottom to juice the economy, but Jerome Powell—the guy Trump actually picked for the job back in 2018—isn't playing ball as fast as the administration likes. This isn't just about a policy disagreement anymore; it’s about the very survival of the Fed’s independence.

The Breaking Point: Subpoenas and "Pretexts"

Things got weird on January 11, 2026. Powell released a video message—a move that’s pretty much unheard of for a Fed Chair—revealing that the Justice Department had hit the Fed with grand jury subpoenas. The DOJ is looking into "cost overruns" for the renovation of the Fed’s D.C. headquarters.

Powell didn't hold back. He called the investigation a "pretext" for political intimidation.

Trump’s nicknames for Powell have reached a new level of "colorful." He’s called him a "stubborn mule," a "real stiff," and "Mr. Too Late." While Trump told NBC News he "doesn’t know anything" about the specific DOJ probe, he’s been shouting from the rooftops that he wants Powell out.

📖 Related: What Really Happened With Trump Revoking Mayorkas Secret Service Protection

Can the President Actually Fire Powell?

This is the multi-billion dollar question. Under the Federal Reserve Act, the President can only remove a governor "for cause."

What does "for cause" mean? Nobody really knows because it hasn’t been tested like this before. Historically, it implies things like:

  • Efficiency-killing neglect of duty
  • Legal malfeasance (actual crimes)
  • Corruption

It definitely doesn't mean "he didn't lower interest rates when I asked him to." That’s why this building renovation probe is so critical. If the administration can prove Powell somehow misled Congress or mishandled funds, they might have their "cause." But legal experts, including those at Harvard Law, are skeptical. They see it as a transparent attempt to bypass the law.

The "Two Kevins" Waiting in the Wings

Trump already has a plan for who comes next. He’s publicly pointed to White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett and former Fed governor Kevin Warsh as the top picks. He calls them "The two Kevins."

But even if Trump manages to nominate one of them, they have to get through the Senate. And right now, the Senate is acting like a massive speed bump. Even some Republicans are spooked. Senator Thom Tillis has been vocal, saying he’ll block any new nominee until the legal drama with Powell is resolved. Senator John Kennedy put it bluntly: he thinks the whole "pissing contest" is going to drive interest rates up, not down, by creating market chaos.

👉 See also: Franklin D Roosevelt Civil Rights Record: Why It Is Way More Complicated Than You Think

Why the Markets Are (Surprisingly) Quiet

You’d think the prospect of the President firing the head of the world's most powerful central bank would send stocks into a tailspin.

Nope.

The markets have mostly shrugged. Why? A few reasons:

  1. The "Boy Who Cried Wolf" Effect: Trump has been attacking Powell for years. Investors are used to the noise.
  2. Economic Gravity: The labor market is cooling anyway. Most traders expect the Fed to cut rates regardless of the political drama because the data supports it.
  3. The May Deadline: Powell’s term as Chair ends in May 2026. Some investors think Trump is just making a lot of noise to ensure Powell doesn't stay on the Board of Governors after his chairmanship expires.

The Real Risk Nobody Talks About

While the stock market is "yawning," the long-term danger is real. It’s what economists call the "time inconsistency problem."

If a President can force a Fed Chair to cut rates whenever they want a political win, inflation becomes a permanent guest. We saw this in the 1970s when President Nixon pressured Arthur Burns. It led to years of painful, double-digit inflation that only ended when Paul Volcker (a legend in these circles) jacked rates up to nearly 20%, causing a massive recession.

✨ Don't miss: 39 Carl St and Kevin Lau: What Actually Happened at the Cole Valley Property

Jerome Powell seems to be positioning himself as the modern Volcker. He’s digging in his heels, essentially saying that the Fed sets rates based on data, not Tweets.

What Happens Next?

This isn't going to be resolved by a simple "You're fired."

Keep an eye on Trump v. Cook. This is a Supreme Court case regarding Trump’s attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook. The ruling there will set the precedent for what "for cause" actually means. If the Court sides with Trump, Powell’s days are likely numbered. If they side with the Fed, Powell probably stays until May.

Actionable Insights for You:

  • Watch the Bond Market: If you see 10-year Treasury yields start spiking while stocks stay flat, that’s a sign that investors are finally getting worried about long-term inflation caused by political meddling.
  • Ignore the "Pretext" Headlines: The building renovation story is a side show. The real story is the power struggle over the 2% inflation target.
  • Diversify into Hard Assets: If the Fed's independence actually crumbles, the dollar could weaken. Gold, real estate, or even high-quality international stocks might be a good hedge against a more "political" Fed.

Powell's term as a member of the Board of Governors technically goes until 2028. Even if he loses the Chairmanship in May, he could stay on as a regular member just to spite the administration. That would be a truly wild scenario—a former Chair sitting in the room, watching his successor take orders from the White House.

Whatever happens, the "gentleman’s agreement" that kept the Fed separate from the White House for 50 years is officially dead. We’re in a new era of "Politicized Money," and you’ve got to be prepared for the volatility that comes with it.