Public relations is basically the art of making the unpalatable look like a five-star meal. We see it everywhere. But when you look at something rehabilitated by a PR firm, the New York Times reporting on the Saudi Arabia "Vision 2030" rollout stands as the ultimate case study in how the gears of global influence actually turn. It wasn't just a minor tweak. It was a multi-million dollar attempt to pivot the brand of an entire kingdom from "austere oil giant" to "Silicon Valley’s best friend."
It almost worked.
Money talks. In the world of high-stakes reputation management, it shouts. Firms like Edelman, Gladstone Place Partners, and MSLGroup have all, at various points, navigated the choppy waters of representing foreign interests. But the Saudi case is unique because of the sheer scale. We’re talking about a massive, coordinated effort to scrub a legacy of human rights concerns and replace it with images of neon-lit futuristic cities like NEOM.
The McKinsey Connection and the NYT Exposure
Let's get into the weeds. One of the most jarring examples of a reputation being "managed" came to light when the New York Times detailed a report by McKinsey & Company. This wasn't your standard PR fluff. The firm had identified key activists on Twitter who were critical of the government's austerity measures.
Think about that for a second.
A consulting giant, working to help a government "rehabilitate" its economic image, creates a document that tracks dissent. Later, some of those individuals were arrested. McKinsey later said they were "horrified" by the possibility that their report was misused. But the damage to the narrative of a "modernizing" Saudi Arabia was done. It showed the dark underbelly of what happens when data meets reputation management.
Why "Modernization" is the Ultimate PR Hook
PR firms love the word "reform." It’s a magic spell.
🔗 Read more: Is Today a Holiday for the Stock Market? What You Need to Know Before the Opening Bell
If you can frame a client as a "reformer," you’ve already won half the battle with Western media. Between 2016 and 2018, the narrative surrounding Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) was almost exclusively about progress. Women driving. Movie theaters opening. These were real changes, sure, but they were also strategic milestones used by PR firms to distract from less savory geopolitical moves.
You’ve probably seen those glossy spreads in magazines or the high-production videos of "The Line." That’s the work of people who get paid $50,000 a month—often much more—to ensure you think about flying taxis instead of the war in Yemen. It’s a distraction technique as old as time, just with better 4K rendering.
The Khashoggi Breaking Point
Everything changed in October 2018. When Jamal Khashoggi, a Washington Post columnist, was murdered in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, the PR machine hit a brick wall. This is where the rehabilitation process gets fascinatingly messy.
Several firms, including the high-profile Harbour Group, dropped their accounts almost immediately. It was a "rats leaving a sinking ship" moment, but for consultants. They realized that no amount of spin could fix a state-sanctioned assassination in a consulate.
But here’s the kicker: the silence didn't last.
Within a few years, the money started flowing again. The rehabilitation didn't stop; it just went quiet for a while. This is a pattern in the industry. When a scandal hits, you go dark. You wait for the news cycle to churn. You wait for the public to get bored or distracted by the next crisis. Then, you start sponsoring golf tournaments.
💡 You might also like: Olin Corporation Stock Price: What Most People Get Wrong
LIV Golf and the "Sportswashing" Playbook
If you want to talk about something rehabilitated by a PR firm, you have to talk about LIV Golf. This is the textbook definition of "sportswashing."
By pouring billions into a rival golf league, the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) essentially forced the sporting world to acknowledge them as a major player. They didn't need you to love them. They just needed you to play with them.
The PR strategy here was brilliant in a cynical way. They turned a human rights conversation into a "growing the game" conversation. They used professional athletes as human shields against criticism. When fans are arguing about prize purses and shotgun starts, they aren't talking about the NYT reports on political prisoners. It’s a pivot. A very expensive, very successful pivot.
The Mechanics of the "Invisible" Spin
How do these firms actually do it? It’s not all press releases.
- Ghostwriting Op-eds: Ever read a piece by a foreign dignitary that sounds perfectly tuned to an American ear? A PR firm wrote that.
- Third-Party Validation: They find academics or "experts" at think tanks (which they often fund) to write positive reports.
- SEO Suppression: They flood the internet with positive stories so the "bad" stuff gets pushed to page two of Google.
- Influencer Junkets: Inviting travel bloggers to a luxury resort in the desert to show how "open" and "welcoming" the country is.
It’s a multi-layered cake of influence. By the time you see a positive story on your social feed, you’ve likely been hit by three other "organic" touchpoints created by a firm in D.C. or London.
The Ethics of Reputation Laundering
Is it wrong?
📖 Related: Funny Team Work Images: Why Your Office Slack Channel Is Obsessed With Them
Well, it depends on who you ask. If you ask a PR executive, they’ll tell you everyone deserves a voice and that they are helping a country transition to a better future. They argue that engagement is better than isolation. If you ask an investigative journalist at the NYT, they’ll show you the trail of money that leads to suppressed dissent.
The reality is that PR firms are often the architects of our global reality. They decide which "reforms" get the spotlight and which "crimes" get the fine print. When a regime or a disgraced CEO hires a top-tier firm, they aren't just buying ads. They are buying a seat back at the table of polite society.
How to Spot the Spin in the Wild
You have to be a skeptical reader.
When you see a sudden influx of stories about a controversial figure "pivoting" to philanthropy or a "modernizing" government, look at who is paying for the ads. Check the FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) filings. These are public records in the U.S. that show exactly which PR firms are being paid by foreign governments.
Usually, the truth isn't in the headline about the new tech hub. It’s in the quiet paragraph at the bottom of a business report about a billion-dollar lobbying contract.
Moving Forward: Actionable Insights for the Informed Reader
Understanding how rehabilitation works is the only way to avoid being manipulated by it. We live in an era where "truth" is often just the highest bidder's version of events.
- Check the FARA Database: If you see a country suddenly getting a lot of positive press, search the FARA records. It will tell you which U.S. firms are behind the push.
- Follow the Money in Sports: When a massive new league or tournament appears out of nowhere, ask why. Is it for profit, or is it for "brand alignment"?
- Look for Sourcing: If an article relies heavily on "government-provided data" or "tours organized by the Ministry," take it with a grain of salt.
- Identify the "Pivot": Notice when a conversation shifts from a person's past actions to their "new vision." That shift is rarely accidental; it’s a choreographed PR move.
The story of Saudi Arabia’s image makeover is a reminder that reputation is a commodity. It can be bought, sold, and polished. But as the NYT has shown repeatedly, no amount of polish can entirely hide the cracks if you look close enough. Be the person who looks closer.