The air inside the papal plane is always a bit different during the flight back to Rome. It’s where some of the most unscripted, raw moments of this papacy happen. In late 2024, high above the Pacific, Pope Francis didn't hold back. When asked about the choice facing American voters, he basically called both paths a moral minefield. He was blunt. He called it a choice between the "lesser of two evils."
On one side, he pointed to Kamala Harris and her support for abortion rights. On the other, he looked at Donald Trump’s promises of mass deportations. For Francis, both were "against life."
But as the 2025 inauguration rolled around, the rhetoric shifted from general warnings to a direct, formal confrontation. When Pope Francis weighs in on Trump's immigration pledges, he isn't just talking politics. He’s talking theology. And for the Vatican, this has become a "major crisis" of human dignity.
The Letter That Changed Everything
Fast forward to February 11, 2025. The Pope released a letter to the American bishops that sent shockwaves through the pews. It wasn't a "congratulations on the new term" kind of note. It was a sharp, almost biting critique of the Trump administration's "program of mass deportations."
Francis used a phrase that's going to be quoted for years: "What is built on the basis of force, and not on the truth about the equal dignity of every human being, begins badly and will end badly."
Think about that for a second. He’s not just saying it’s a bad policy. He’s saying it’s fundamentally doomed because it ignores the soul of the person. He specifically pushed back against the idea that being "undocumented" is the same thing as being "criminal." To Francis, a "rightly formed conscience" cannot look at a family fleeing poverty and see a threat.
🔗 Read more: When Does Joe Biden's Term End: What Actually Happened
Why the "Vatican Wall" Argument Doesn't Work
If you’ve spent any time on social media lately, you’ve seen the comeback. Tom Homan, the border czar, was quick to point it out. "He’s got a wall around the Vatican, does he not?" Homan asked. It's a classic "gotcha" moment. But if we’re being honest, it’s a bit of a false equivalency.
The Leonine Wall was built in the 9th century to stop pirates from sacking St. Peter’s Basilica. Today, the Vatican is open to millions of tourists every year. You can walk into St. Peter’s Square without showing a passport. The Pope’s argument isn't that nations shouldn't have borders. In fact, in that same February letter, he acknowledged that states have a right to defend themselves and keep people safe from "serious crimes."
The real beef? It’s the indiscriminate nature of the pledges. When the administration talks about deporting millions, Francis sees a violation of the ordo amoris—the order of love.
The Clash Over "Ordo Amoris"
This is where things get really nerdy and theological. Vice President JD Vance has used the term ordo amoris to argue that we have a moral obligation to love our "own" first—our families, our neighbors, our fellow citizens. It’s a compelling argument for many.
Francis, however, took that exact Latin phrase and flipped it. He wrote that Christian love isn't a "concentric expansion of interests" that eventually reaches others if there’s enough left over. He pointed to the Parable of the Good Samaritan. The Samaritan didn't ask for the injured man's ID or citizenship. He just saw a human in the dirt.
💡 You might also like: Fire in Idyllwild California: What Most People Get Wrong
Real-World Impact: Fear in the Pews
It’s easy to treat this as a war of words between powerful men in suits and robes. But on the ground, the impact is visceral.
- Religious Groups Suing: Dozens of organizations have already filed lawsuits to prevent arrests in places of worship.
- The "Lesser of Two Evils" Dilemma: Catholic voters are still split. Some see the Pope’s stance as a betrayal of "law and order," while others feel empowered to protect their neighbors.
- Archbishop Appointments: In the middle of this, Francis named Bishop Edward Weisenburger—a vocal advocate for migrants—as the new Archbishop of Detroit. That’s not a coincidence. It’s a move.
Honestly, the tension is the highest it's been since 2016, when Francis famously said that anyone who builds a wall instead of a bridge is "not Christian." Trump called that comment "disgraceful" back then. In 2025, the Pope returned the favor, calling the mass deportation plans a "disgrace."
What Most People Get Wrong
There’s a misconception that the Pope is calling for "open borders." He’s not. He’s actually been pretty consistent about the need for "orderly and legal migration." What he’s rejecting is the criminalization of the person.
He’s worried that when we start seeing human beings as "illegal" first and "human" second, we lose our own humanity in the process. He’s warned that focusing too much on national identity can lead to an "ideological criterion" that distorts society. Basically, if you have to hurt people to "save" your culture, you’ve already lost the culture you were trying to save.
Actionable Steps for Navigating the News
The headlines are going to stay messy. If you're trying to make sense of this clash, here's how to look at it without getting lost in the spin:
📖 Related: Who Is More Likely to Win the Election 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
Look for the Nuance in Official Documents
Don't just read the tweets. Read the actual transcripts from the Vatican Press Office or the USCCB (U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops). You'll find that the Church acknowledges the right to border security, which is often left out of the viral clips.
Distinguish Between Law and Dignity
The administration is focused on the legality of the status. The Pope is focused on the dignity of the soul. Understanding that these two are talking past each other—one using a legal lens, the other a moral one—helps explain why they can never seem to agree.
Follow the "Boots on the Ground"
Watch how local bishops in border cities like El Paso or Brownsville react. They are the ones who have to balance the Pope's directives with the reality of overcrowded shelters and federal enforcement. Their statements usually offer the most practical middle ground.
Evaluate the "Lesser of Two Evils" Concept
For yourself, consider the Pope’s advice to "examine your conscience." He didn't tell people how to vote; he told them they must vote and take responsibility for the moral compromise they choose. This is a powerful framework for any political decision, not just immigration.
The standoff between the White House and the Holy See isn't ending anytime soon. As the deportation flights continue and the legal battles mount, the question remains: Can a nation be "secure" if its moral leaders believe its soul is at risk?