We've all been there. You're scrolling through the guide on a lazy Sunday, and you see a title that sounds vaguely familiar. Usually, it's something about a "dangerous" nanny or a "deadly" secret. But then there’s Playing with Fire, a Lifetime movie that actually manages to stick in your brain for all the wrong (and right) reasons.
If you're thinking of the 2019 John Cena comedy where he plays a smokejumper babysitting three kids, stop right there. That’s a totally different vibe. The Lifetime version of Playing with Fire—which first hit screens in March 2025—is a dark, psychological thriller that takes the "heroic firefighter" trope and completely flips it on its head. Honestly, it’s the kind of movie that makes you want to double-check your smoke detector batteries and then maybe change your locks.
The Plot: When Your Hero Is Actually Your Nightmare
The story centers on Natalie and Loughlin Collins, a couple already on shaky ground. Natalie, played by Kirsten Comerford, is a nurse working herself to the bone to support her husband while he finishes his degree. They’re "struggling" in that classic Lifetime way—lots of tense kitchen conversations and meaningful sighs.
Everything changes when a massive fire guts their home. Natalie barely escapes with her life, and the man who pulls her from the wreckage is Jack, a charming firefighter played by Stephen Adekolu. In most movies, this is where the romance begins. In a Lifetime movie, this is where the red flags start flying at full mast.
Jack doesn't just save Natalie; he begins to insert himself into her life. He’s "helpful" in that way that feels suffocating. He finds them an apartment (conveniently in his own building), helps them move, and slowly starts gaslighting the couple to drive a wedge between them. He plays on Natalie’s existing insecurities and Loughlin’s (Brett Geddes) frustrations until the marriage is essentially a pile of ash.
Why This Movie Hits Different
What makes Playing with Fire stand out from the typical weekend thriller is the sheer audacity of the villain's methods. We aren't just talking about following someone home. Jack uses some surprisingly modern—and terrifying—tactics.
- AI Voice Cloning: In one of the movie's more "2026-ready" twists, Jack uses AI to recreate Loughlin’s voice. He uses this to lure a student who has a crush on Loughlin into a compromising situation, then takes photos to "prove" Loughlin is cheating. It’s a dirty trick that feels uncomfortably plausible today.
- The "Helper" Mask: Stephen Adekolu plays Jack with this eerie, flat politeness. He’s the guy everyone at the station loves, which makes it impossible for Natalie to believe he’s a psychopath. It captures that real-world frustration of knowing something is wrong but being told you’re just "stressed" or "traumatized."
- The Disposable Captain: One of the darker moments involves Captain Mandy (Shannon McDonough), the only person who actually sees through Jack's facade. In a move that feels genuinely cold for a TV movie, Jack dispatches her once she starts asking questions. It raises the stakes from "creepy stalker" to "legitimate murderer" pretty quickly.
Real Talk: The "Lifetime" Logic
Look, it’s a Lifetime movie. You have to go into it with a certain level of suspended disbelief. For instance, Natalie’s best friend Alesha is basically there to be the "horny friend" who ignores every single warning sign because she thinks the firefighters are hot. It’s a bit of a cliché, and it can be frustrating to watch characters walk into obvious traps.
Also, the fire physics are... questionable. One minute the house is engulfed in literal roof-venting flames, and the next, Natalie is telling her friends they just need a bit of paint and some new drywall. If you’re a contractor or a fire safety expert, you might want to look away during those scenes.
✨ Don't miss: Finding A Little Life Quotes with Page Numbers That Actually Hurt
What People Get Wrong About the Ending
A lot of viewers expected a typical "husband saves the day" finale. But Playing with Fire leans more into Natalie's realization that she has to save herself. The climax involves a secondary fire (because of course) where Jack tries to frame Loughlin.
The movie ends on a somewhat resolved note, but it leaves you with that lingering "Lifetime" chill. It’s not just about the fire; it’s about the total destruction of trust. By the time the credits roll, the house might be gone, but the psychological damage is what really sticks.
Actionable Insights for Your Next Watch Party
If you’re planning to dive into this one, here’s how to get the most out of it:
- Spot the AI: Keep an eye out for the scene where Jack uses the voice cloning app. It’s a brief moment but it’s the pivot point for the entire third act.
- The "Soapy Footprints" Mystery: Early in the film, there’s a weird shot of soapy footprints leading to Natalie's bathtub. The movie never explicitly explains them, but if you look closely at Jack’s boots later, the connection is there.
- Check the Cast: If Kirsten Comerford looks familiar, it’s because she’s a staple in this genre. She knows how to play "vulnerable yet resilient" better than almost anyone in the business right now.
Playing with Fire isn't going to win an Oscar, but as a piece of "popcorn" entertainment that taps into modern fears of technology and betrayal, it’s surprisingly effective. Just maybe don't watch it right before you have your annual furnace inspection.
Next Steps for Your Movie Night:
- Check your local listings or the Lifetime app to see if Playing with Fire is currently streaming in your region.
- If you're looking for something with a similar "obsessed professional" vibe, seek out The Wrong Stepfather or The Boy in the Walls.
- Verify your home security settings, especially if you've recently had "helpful" contractors or service workers in your home who seem a little too interested in your personal life.