It was supposed to be the coronation of a new king. Instead, it became a three-year masterclass in cultural friction. When Piers Morgan took over for the suspender-wearing legend Larry King in January 2011, the media world was buzzing. CNN wanted a firebrand. They wanted the British "Simon Cowell of news" to shake up a 9 p.m. slot that had grown a bit dusty.
They got exactly what they asked for, and that was arguably the problem.
Piers Morgan Tonight CNN launched with massive fanfare and an interview with Oprah Winfrey that pulled in 2.1 million viewers. For a moment, it looked like the gamble might pay off. But the honeymoon was shorter than a celebrity marriage. By the second night, the audience had already cratered to 1.3 million. It was the beginning of a long, slow slide into a ratings "bath" that would eventually lead to the show's demise in 2014.
The Identity Crisis of a Late-Night Giant
The show didn't just struggle with numbers; it struggled with its own soul. Originally designed as a place for long-form, "get" interviews—think Hollywood A-listers and global leaders—the world had other plans. History intervened. Just days after the debut, the Arab Spring erupted. Then came the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan.
Suddenly, a guy who had spent his career in British tabloids and judging talent shows was expected to anchor hard-hitting breaking news for hours on end. He hadn't really done that before. You could see the gears grinding.
Morgan himself later admitted to the New York Times that he felt he was "treading water" during quiet news cycles with "sub-par guests." Honestly, viewers could feel that boredom through the screen. When he was engaged, he was electric. When he was bored, the show felt like a chore.
👉 See also: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
Why the "Britishness" Backfired
There is a specific kind of American skepticism toward British people offering advice on how to run the United States. It's basically baked into the DNA of the country since 1776.
Piers didn't just ignore this; he leaned into it. He refused to "assimilate" in a way that resonated with middle America. He'd talk about cricket or round football (soccer) in a way that felt alienating to a guy in a sports bar in Ohio.
Then came the gun control crusade.
After the horrific Sandy Hook shooting in 2012, Morgan stopped being just an interviewer and became an activist. He pounced on pro-gun guests. He called them "idiots" and "dangerous." He even got into a legendary, shouting-match-style confrontation with conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. While this won him fans on the coasts, it deeply alienated the "belly" of the country. A petition to deport him actually reached the White House.
While the Obama administration cited the First Amendment and let him stay, the damage to the ratings was done.
✨ Don't miss: Shamea Morton and the Real Housewives of Atlanta: What Really Happened to Her Peach
The Brutal Reality of the Numbers
If you want to know why a show gets the axe, you always look at the spreadsheets. The data was grim. By the time 2014 rolled around, the show (which had been renamed Piers Morgan Live) was hitting all-time lows.
- February 20, 2014: The show pulled in only 50,000 viewers in the key 25–54 demographic.
- The Comparison: Larry King, even in his "weak" final year, was averaging around 657,000 total viewers. Morgan was frequently dipping well below that.
- The Competition: He was getting crushed by Sean Hannity on Fox News and Rachel Maddow on MSNBC.
CNN's then-president Jeff Zucker, who had inherited Morgan from a previous regime, eventually decided he’d seen enough. The show was cancelled in February 2014, with the final episode airing on March 28. It ended not with a celebrity bang, but with a plea for gun control and coverage of the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370.
Notable Guests and Weird Moments
Despite the rocky road, the show produced some genuinely fascinating television. It wasn't all just shouting about the Second Amendment.
- Charlie Sheen: In 2011, during Sheen's "winning" and "tiger blood" phase, Morgan sat down with him for an interview that brought in 1.346 million viewers. It was car-crash TV at its finest.
- The Dalai Lama: In a weirdly charming segment, Morgan tried to teach the Dalai Lama about "selfies."
- Rudy Giuliani: An interview about the Ukraine crisis in 2014 resulted in one of the show's lowest-rated nights, proving that even "big names" couldn't save a format that felt disconnected from what the audience wanted at 9 p.m.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Failure
It’s easy to say "America hated Piers Morgan," but that’s a bit of a lazy take. The truth is more nuanced. The show failed because it sat in a "no-man's land." It wasn't quite a news show, and it wasn't quite a celebrity talk show.
CNN is a place people go for information, but Morgan’s background was in "opinionated entertainment." This "unhappy collision," as journalist David Carr called it, meant that when news broke, people went to Anderson Cooper. When they wanted partisan red meat, they went to Fox or MSNBC.
🔗 Read more: Who is Really in the Enola Holmes 2 Cast? A Look at the Faces Behind the Mystery
Morgan was left with a dwindling audience of people who didn't mind being lectured by a guy who really, really missed Arsenal.
Actionable Lessons from the CNN Era
If you're looking back at this period of media history, there are a few real takeaways about why certain personalities "work" on American TV and others don't.
Know your room. Transplanting a UK tabloid style directly into a US news environment requires a level of "toning down" that Morgan wasn't willing to do. He kept the volume at 11 when the audience wanted a 7.
Consistency is king. The shift from "The New Larry King" to "The Gun Control Crusader" to "The Breaking News Anchor" gave the audience whiplash. People like to know what they're getting when they turn on the TV at the same time every night.
Engagement over Aggression.
While "pouncing" on guests makes for great YouTube clips today, it can be exhausting for a nightly viewer who just wants a decent conversation.
The legacy of the show remains a cautionary tale for networks. You can buy fame, and you can buy a flashy set, but you can’t buy a cultural connection. That has to be earned.
If you are interested in how cable news shifted after this era, you can look into Jeff Zucker's subsequent move toward documentary-style programming in the 9 p.m. slot, which moved CNN away from the "personality talk show" model for a significant period. You might also want to compare Morgan's CNN run with his later "Uncensored" project, which leaned even further into the very controversies that initially alienated his cable audience.