You’ve probably seen the grainy, haunting images of the 16th President. Abraham Lincoln, sitting tall in a chair, or perhaps that one famous, slightly blurred portrait taken just days before his death. But if you are searching for actual photos of Lincoln assassination—the moment John Wilkes Booth stepped into the state box at Ford’s Theatre—you are going to be disappointed.
They don't exist.
Seriously. Photography in 1865 was a slow, cumbersome process involving wet plates and long exposures. You couldn't just whip out an iPhone and snap a shot of a madman jumping onto a stage. Yet, the visual record surrounding the event is one of the most documented moments in American history. It’s a paradox. We have the aftermath, the conspirators, the blood-stained clothes, and the execution, but the act itself remains a blank space filled only by woodcut illustrations and later recreations.
The Missing Frame: Why There Are No Photos of the Shooting
It’s kinda weird to think about now, given our camera-saturated world. Back then, if you wanted a photo, you had to be still. Very still. For several seconds. The chaos inside Ford’s Theatre on April 14, 1865, was the polar opposite of what 19th-century technology could capture.
When Booth fired that .44 caliber derringer, the crowd was paralyzed, then hysterical. Even if a photographer had been sitting in the front row with a camera ready, the low light of the theater and the sudden movement would have resulted in nothing but a gray smudge.
Interestingly, there is a "deathbed" photo that people often confuse for a real image of the President in his final hours. It’s a fake. Or rather, it’s a later recreation. There is only one confirmed photograph of Abraham Lincoln in his casket, taken by Moses P. Rice while the body lay in state in the New York City City Hall.
That specific photo was almost lost to history forever. Secretary of War Edwin Stanton was absolutely livid when he found out it had been taken. He ordered the plates destroyed. He wanted the dignity of the President preserved, not turned into a macabre souvenir. But one print survived in the papers of John Hay, Lincoln's secretary, and it wasn't rediscovered until 1952 by a 14-year-old boy named Ronald Rietveld in the Illinois State Historical Library.
History is messy like that.
The Faces of the Conspiracy: Gardner’s Haunting Portraits
While we don't have the crime, we have the criminals. Alexander Gardner, a former associate of Mathew Brady, took some of the most chilling photos of Lincoln assassination conspirators while they were held in iron monitors on the Potomac River.
👉 See also: Why are US flags at half staff today and who actually makes that call?
Lewis Powell is the one that usually stops people in their tracks.
He was the man sent to kill Secretary of State William Seward. In his mugshot, he’s leaning against a wall, staring directly into the lens with a look that feels unsettlingly modern. He doesn't look like a 19th-century caricature. He looks like someone you’d see on the news today. The clarity is staggering. You can see the texture of his sweater and the defiance in his eyes.
Then there is the execution itself.
On July 7, 1865, Gardner was there again. He captured a sequence of images that serve as the first "photojournalism" of a major American event. He photographed the four conspirators—Mary Surratt, Lewis Powell, David Herold, and George Atzerodt—as they were led onto the gallows at the Old Arsenal Penitentiary.
Breaking Down the Execution Photos
- The Umbrella Shot: It was a blistering hot day. In one photo, you see soldiers holding umbrellas over the condemned and the officials. It’s a bizarre, domestic touch in a scene of state-sponsored death.
- The Drop: Gardner caught the moment the trapdoors opened. The bodies are blurred. It’s a grim reminder of the shutter speeds of the time.
- The Empty Nooses: He even took a photo of the gallows after the bodies were removed. It’s eerie. It feels like a movie set after the actors have gone home, but the stakes were infinitely higher.
The Ford’s Theatre Crime Scene
Immediately after the assassination, the theater was closed. It became a crime scene, though not in the way we think of forensics today.
Photographers like Mathew Brady rushed to the scene to document the interior. These images are vital for historians because the theater was gutted shortly after. The government, fearing the site would become a "shrine" to the assassination or a place of morbid curiosity, prohibited its use as a theater for decades.
If you look at these interior shots, you’ll notice the Treasury Guard flag that Booth’s spur allegedly caught on as he leaped to the stage. You see the rocking chair Lincoln was sitting in. These aren't just pictures of a room; they are the skeletal remains of a tragedy.
Some people claim there are photos of the bloodstains on the floor of the box. Most of those are later hand-colored lithographs or staged photos from the 1900s. Realistically, by the time a photographer could set up their tripod and plates the next morning, the room had been trampled by doctors, soldiers, and investigators.
✨ Don't miss: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?
The Post-Mortem Mystery and the Lincoln "Ghost"
People in the 1860s were obsessed with death. It was everywhere. The Civil War had just ended, leaving hundreds of thousands dead. This gave rise to "spirit photography," a total scam where photographers used double exposures to make it look like ghosts were standing behind their subjects.
Mary Todd Lincoln, who was understandably devastated and arguably mentally unstable following the murder of her husband and sons, famously fell for this.
There is a well-known "spirit" photo of Mary Todd Lincoln where a translucent Abraham Lincoln appears to be resting his hands on her shoulders. It was taken by William H. Mumler. It’s a fake, obviously. But it’s a crucial piece of the visual history because it shows how the public used photos of Lincoln assassination—or the lack thereof—to process their grief. They wanted to see him one last time, even if it was a trick of the light and a dishonest chemist.
Why the Images Still Haunt Us Today
There’s a rawness to 1865 photography. Because there were no snapshots, every photo was a deliberate act. The person had to choose to stand there. The photographer had to prepare the chemicals.
When you look at the conspirator photos, you aren't just looking at history; you are looking at the immediate, vibrating aftermath of a national collapse. We don't need a photo of the trigger being pulled. The photos of the empty chair, the hooded prisoners, and the blurred bodies on the rope tell a much more violent story.
The lack of a "money shot" of the assassination has actually allowed the event to maintain a certain mythological status. We have to imagine it. We have to rely on the eyewitness accounts of people like Major Henry Rathbone, who was in the box and tried to stop Booth, only to be slashed to the bone.
How to Spot Fakes and Recreations
If you are browsing online and see a high-definition, dramatic shot of a man in a top hat falling over in a theater box, it’s from a movie. Probably the 2012 Lincoln film or a Discovery Channel reenactment.
A few things to keep in mind when looking at "historical" images:
🔗 Read more: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
- Check the Shutter Speed: If there is a lot of fast action (people running, jumping) and it’s perfectly crisp, it’s not from 1865.
- Look at the Lighting: Authentic photos from this era used natural light or very primitive flashes. If the lighting looks like a Hollywood set, it probably is.
- The "Deathbed" Scene: There are many paintings of Lincoln on his deathbed at the Petersen House. They often show 20+ people in the room. While many people did cycle through the room, they weren't all there at once—the room was tiny, about 10 by 15 feet. Any "photo" showing a crowd around him in that room is a composite or a painting.
Taking Action: Where to See the Real History
If you actually want to see the authentic visual record, don't just trust a Google Image search. You have to go to the sources that preserve the original glass plates.
Start with the Library of Congress. Their digital collection is insane. You can zoom in on the Gardner execution photos so closely you can see the grain of the wood on the gallows. It’s far more impactful than a low-res thumbnail on a conspiracy blog.
Visit the National Museum of Health and Medicine. They actually have the lead ball that killed Lincoln, along with fragments of his skull. It’s morbid, sure, but if you’re looking for the "physical" truth of the assassination, that’s where it lives.
Check out the Ford’s Theatre National Historic Site. They have the actual derringer. Seeing the scale of the weapon—it’s tiny, almost like a toy—changes how you visualize the photos of the event.
The real "photos" of the Lincoln assassination aren't about the bullet. They are about the faces of the people who let it happen, the man who did it, and the empty space left behind in a theater box in Washington D.C.
To truly understand the visual history, look at the 1865 portraits of Lincoln taken by Alexander Gardner just two months before the end. Look at the "cracked plate" portrait. A crack in the glass plate runs right across Lincoln's forehead, almost exactly where the bullet would enter weeks later. It’s a chilling, accidental foreshadowing that no staged photo could ever capture.
Focus your research on the National Archives or the Smithsonian Institution records for the most accurate, high-resolution scans of the conspirators' trial and execution. Avoid "Pinterest" history, which often mislabels movie stills as 19th-century artifacts. Stick to the curated collections of the Library of Congress to ensure you are viewing genuine 1865 plates.